UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]

Check the appropriate box:

[_]

Preliminary Proxy Statement

[_]

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14A-6(E)(2))

[X]

Definitive Proxy Statement

[_]

Definitive Additional Materials

[_]

Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12

MEREDITH CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]	No fee required

[_]	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):


	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:


	(5)	Total fee paid:

[_]	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

	[_]	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.


	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:


	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:


	(3)	Filing Party:


	(4)	Date Filed:

Table of Contents

(LOGO)

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

November ~~12, 2014~~9, 2016

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of holders of common stock and ~~class~~Class B common stock of Meredith Corporation (hereinafter called the “Company”) will be held at the Company’s principal executive offices, 1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3023 on Wednesday, November ~~12, 2014~~9, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

	1.
	1.	To elect ~~three~~two Class ~~I directors~~III Directors for terms expiring in ~~2017 and one Class II director for a term expiring in 2015;~~ 2019;

	2.	To approve, on an advisory basis, the executive compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement;

	3.	~~To approve the Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan;~~

	4.	To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending June 30, ~~2015;~~2017; and

	5. 4.	To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

By resolution of the Board of Directors, only holders of record of the Company’s common stock and ~~class~~Class B common stock at the close of business on September ~~12, 2014~~9, 2016 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.


	By Order of the Board of Directors,



	~~JOHN S. ZIESER~~
	Chief Development Officer
		General Counsel
~~Des Moines, Iowa~~
~~September 26, 2014~~

Des Moines, Iowa
September 26, 2016

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on November ~~12, 2014:~~9,2016:This Proxy Statement and the ~~2014~~2016 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at ~~http://idelivercommunications.com/~~www.idelivercommunications.com/ proxy/~~mdp.~~mdp/. These documents are also posted on our web site at www.meredith.com. Directions to the Annual Meeting are available on our web site at www.meredith.com/~~meredith_corporate/findus.html.~~about-us/our-headquarters.

PROXY STATEMENT
~~2014~~2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS


ABOUT THE ~~2014~~2016 ANNUAL MEETING		1
VOTING PROCEDURES		1
PROPOSAL ONE – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS		4
~~Involvement in Certain Proceedings~~		6
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE		7 6
Board Leadership Structure		7 6
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight		7
Corporate Governance Guidelines		8
Director Independence		8
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD		9
The Board		9
Director Stock Ownership		9
Committees of the Board		9
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation		10
PROPOSAL TWO – APPROVAL OF ADVISORY RESOLUTION ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (“SAY ON PAY”)		10
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS		11
Executive Summary		11
Fiscal ~~2014~~2016 Financial Highlights		11
Say on Pay Vote		12
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives		12
The Elements of Our Compensation Program		13
Compensation Consultant		19
Treatment of Special Items		19
Tax Deductibility of Compensation – Section 162(m) Compliance		20 19
Practices Regarding the Grant of Options		20 19
Post-Termination Compensation		20
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT		21 20
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION		21
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal ~~Year 2014~~2016		21
Awards	22
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal ~~Year 2014~~2016		23 22
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End ~~2014~~2016		24 23
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal ~~Year 2014~~2016		25 24
Pension Benefits in Fiscal ~~2014~~2016		25 24
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in Fiscal ~~Year 2014~~2016		26 25
Potential Payments upon Termination		27 26
Employment and Other Agreements		27 26
Change in Control		32 31
Payment Obligations upon Termination Due to Change in Control		33 32
COMPONENTS OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION		35 34
Director Compensation for Fiscal ~~2014~~2016		35
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		36 35
AUDIT COMMITTEE DISCLOSURE		38 37
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy		38 37
Service Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		38 37
Report of the Audit Committee		38
PROPOSAL THREE ~~- APPROVAL OF 2014 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN~~		39
~~PROPOSAL FOUR~~ – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		43 39
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS		44 39
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE		44 40
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTION POLICY AND PROCEDURES		44 40
ANNUAL REPORT AND ADDITIONAL MATERIALS		45 40
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS		45 40
How to Receive Future Proxy Statements and Annual Reports Online		45 41
SUBMITTING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS		45 41
~~EXHIBIT A - 2014 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN~~Appendix		~~E-1~~ 42

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
November ~~12, 2014~~9, 2016

ABOUT THE ~~2014~~2016 ANNUAL MEETING

This Proxy Statement, along with the ~~Company’s~~Meredith Corporation’s Annual Report to Shareholders, is being sent to shareholders on or about September 26, ~~2014~~2016 in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Meredith Corporation (“Meredith” or the “Company”). The proxies are to be used in voting at the Annual Meeting of holders of common stock and ~~class~~Class B common stock of the Company, to be held at the Company’s principal executive offices, 1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3023 on Wednesday, November ~~12, 2014~~9, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition, officers and employees of the Company may solicit the return of proxies from certain shareholders by telephone or meeting. Such officers and employees will receive no additional compensation for such solicitation activities.

VOTING PROCEDURES

Who Is Entitled to Vote?

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on September ~~12, 2014~~9, 2016 (the “record date”) will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. On the record date, there were issued and outstanding ~~37,133,458~~39,276,748 shares of common stock, each entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, there were issued and outstanding ~~7,298,085~~5,282,906 shares of ~~class~~Class B common stock, each entitled to ten votes at the Annual Meeting, for a total of ~~110,114,308~~92,105,808 votes.

How Can I Vote?

You can vote either in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy without attending the meeting. We are again taking advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules that allow companies to furnish proxy materials to their shareholders over the Internet. On or about September 26, ~~2014~~2016 we mailed to shareholders of record on the record date a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our ~~2014~~2016 Annual Report to Shareholders online. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not automatically receive a printed copy of our proxy materials in the mail. You may request a paper copy of our proxy materials by mail or an electronic copy by e-mail. The Notice also contains instructions for voting online.

If you are a holder of record and have requested and received a paper copy of our proxy materials, you may also vote by following the instructions on the proxy card that is included with the proxy materials. As set forth on the proxy card, there are three convenient methods for holders of record to direct their vote by proxy without attending the Annual Meeting:

	1.
	1.	Vote by Mail: You may vote by marking the proxy card, dating and signing it, and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided. Please mail your proxy card promptly to ensure that it is received prior to the closing of the polls at the Annual Meeting. If you vote by returning a proxy card, you do NOT need to vote over the Internet or by telephone.

	2.	Vote by Internet: You may also vote via the Internet. The web site address for Internet voting is provided on your proxy card. You will need to use the control number appearing on your proxy card to vote via the Internet. You can use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions up until ~~noon~~11:59 p.m. Central Standard Time of the day prior to the Annual Meeting. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day. If you vote via the Internet, you do NOT need to vote by telephone or return a ~~proxy card. If~~

Table of Contents


		proxy card. If you vote via the Internet, you may incur costs such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies. You will be responsible for those costs.

	3.	Vote by Telephone: You may also vote by telephone by calling the toll-free number provided on your proxy card. You will need to use the control number appearing on your proxy card to vote by telephone. You may transmit your voting instructions from any touch-tone telephone up until ~~noon~~11:59 p.m. Central Standard Time of the day prior to the Annual Meeting. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day. If you vote by telephone, you do NOT need to vote over the Internet or return a proxy card.

If your shares are held in the name of your bank, broker or other nominee, you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from the holder of record (that is, your bank, broker or other nominee) to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in the name of your bank, broker or other nominee, please contact your bank, broker or other nominee to determine whether you will be able to vote by Internet or telephone.

Please refer to the Notice or the proxy card for more information about the voting methods available to you.

How Can I Change My Vote?

Registered shareholders can revoke their proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by:

	1.
	1.	Delivering timely written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company, Meredith Corporation, 1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3023;

	2.	Submitting another timely, later-dated proxy using the same voting method you used to vote your shares;

	3.	Attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, please contact your bank, broker or other nominee to determine how you may change your vote prior to the Annual Meeting.

How Many Votes Must Be Present to Conduct Business at the Annual Meeting?

In order for business to be conducted, a quorum must be represented either in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. The presence in person or by proxy of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting constitutes a quorum. Shares represented by a proxy marked WITHHOLD or ABSTAIN will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum.

How Many Votes Am I Entitled to Cast?

You are entitled to cast one vote for each share of common stock you own on the record date. You are entitled to cast ten votes for each share of ~~class~~Class B common stock you own on the record date. Shareholders do not have the right to vote cumulatively in electing directors.

How Many Votes Are Required to Elect Directors?

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by holders of shares entitled to vote in the election at a meeting at which a quorum is present. This means that the nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast for the number of positions to be filled are elected. Only votes cast FOR a nominee will be counted. An instruction to WITHHOLD authority to vote for one or more of the nominees will result in those nominees receiving fewer votes, but will not count as a vote AGAINST the nominees. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the director election since only votes FOR a nominee will be counted.

Table of Contents

How Many Votes Are Required to Approve, on an Advisory Basis, the Executive Compensation Program for the Company’sNamed Executive Officers?

~~The~~

To approve the executive compensation program, the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be ~~required to approve the executive compensation program.~~required. For this proposal, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal.

~~How Many Votes Are Required to Approve the Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan?~~

The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to approve the Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. For this proposal, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal.

How Many Votes Are Required to Ratify the Appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as Meredith’s Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm?

The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power present, in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, will be required to ratify the appointment of KPMG. For this proposal, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal.

How Many Votes Are Required to Approve Other Matters?

Unless otherwise required by law or the Company’s Bylaws, the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to approve other matters that may properly come before the meeting.

For matters requiring the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power present, in person or by proxy and entitled to vote, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on such a proposal.

Will My Shares Be Voted if I Do Not Provide Instructions to My Broker?

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name by a broker, the broker, as the record holder of the shares, is required to vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to the broker, the broker will be entitled to vote the shares with respect to discretionary items, but will not be permitted to vote the shares with respect to non-discretionary items (those shares are treated as broker non-votes). The ratification of the appointment of KPMG (Proposal ~~Four)~~Three) is a discretionary item. The election of directors (Proposal One), and the advisory vote on executive compensation ~~(Say~~(“Say on ~~Pay)~~Pay”) (Proposal Two) ~~and the approval of the Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal Three)~~ are non-discretionary items. A broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote shares without instructions from the beneficial owners on Proposals One ~~Two~~ or ~~Three.~~Two.

Who Represents My Proxy at the Annual Meeting?

If you do not vote in person at the Annual Meeting but have voted your shares over the Internet, by telephone or by signing and returning a proxy card, you have authorized ~~certain members of Meredith’s Board of Directors (“Board of Directors” or~~ the ~~“Board”),~~persons named as proxies, as designated by the Board, to represent you and to vote your shares as instructed.

What if I Return a Proxy Card but Do Not Provide Specific Voting Instructions for Some or All of the Items?

All shares that have been properly voted – whether by Internet, telephone or mail – will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions unless such vote has been revoked. If you sign a proxy card but do not give voting instructions, the votes represented by the proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board ~~of Directors~~ and inat the discretion of the persons named as proxies upon such matters not presently known or determined that may properly come before the meeting. The Board ~~of Directors~~ recommends a vote FOR the election of the director nominees, FOR the approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation (Say on Pay)~~, FOR the approval of the Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan~~ and FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal ~~2015.~~

~~Table of Contents~~2017.

What if Other Matters Are Voted on at the Annual Meeting?

If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration and if you have voted your shares by Internet, telephone or mail, the persons named as proxies will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you. At the date of filing this Proxy Statement with the SEC, the Board ~~of Directors~~ did not know of any other matter to be raised at the Annual Meeting.

Table of Contents

How Do I Vote if I participate in the Meredith Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 2002 (the “ESPP”) and/orMeredith Savings and Investment Plan (the “401(k) Plan”)?

If you are a participant in the Company’s ESPP and/or the 401(k) Plan, you have the right to give instructions to the respective plan administrator as to the voting of the shares of stock allocated to your account. The voting of those shares will occur at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. In this regard, please indicate your voting choices by voting online using the instructions on the Notice that has been sent to you, or by voting using the methods as described on the proxy card if you have requested hard copies of the proxy materials. If you hold shares in the 401(k) Plan and do not vote your shares, those shares will be voted by the plan administrator in the same percentage as the shares held in the 401(k) Plan for which directions are received. If you hold shares in the ESPP and do not vote your shares, those shares will be voted by the plan administrator on discretionary matters but will not be voted on non-discretionary matters.

PROPOSAL ONE – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that the Board ~~of Directors~~ shall consist of no fewer than three or more than fifteen persons, as may be provided by the Bylaws, to be divided into three classes, each class to consist, as nearly as may be possible, of one-third of the total number of ~~directors. The~~directors.The Bylaws provide that the number of directors shall be fixed from time to time by resolution of the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that no director may serve on the Board past the annual meeting of ~~Directors.~~the Company following his or her 72nd birthday. The ~~last resolution provided~~Board waived this age limitation with respect to Dr. Mary Sue Coleman and Mr. Joel W. Johnson at the time of the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting as a result of the Meredith-Media General, Inc. transaction that was in effect at that time.

Dr. Coleman’s term as a Class III director ends at the 2016 Annual Meeting and she will not stand for ~~nine directors.~~re-election. Mr. Johnson’s term as a Class II director expires at the 2018 Annual Meeting, at which time he will retire from the Board.

Listed below are ~~the three~~two persons who have been nominated as Class IIII directors to serve three-year terms to expire in ~~2017. Mr. Marineau and Ms. Tallett currently serve as directors~~2019. Each of the ~~Company and were previously elected by the shareholders. The Board of Directors unanimously resolved to recommend that Donald A. Baer be nominated~~director nominees currently serves as a ~~Class I Director. In addition,~~director of the ~~Board of Directors has resolved that Donald C. Berg be moved from a Class I to a Class II director with a term expiring in 2015.~~Company. Should any of the nominees become unable to serve prior to the upcoming Annual Meeting, an event that is not anticipated by the Company, the proxies, except those from shareholders who have given instructions to WITHHOLD voting for the following nominees, will be voted FOR such other person or persons as the Nominating/Governance Committee may nominate. Certain information concerning each of the nominees standing for election and each of the continuing directors is set forth below.

Nominees for Election as Class III Directors – Terms to Expire in 2019


Stephen M. Lacy	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Meredith Corporation

	Mr. Lacy, 62, is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Meredith and was elected to his current position on February 1, 2010. Mr. Lacy joined Meredith in 1998 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). He was promoted to President of the National Media Group in 2000, elected to the Board and named President and Chief Operating Officer in 2004 and elected President and CEO in 2006. Mr. Lacy joined the Board of Directors of Hormel Foods Corporation in September 2011, serving as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Lacy also joined the Board of Directors of Great Western Bancorp, Inc. in June 2015, serving as the Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee. His intimate knowledge of our Company, gained through over 15 years of service in critical executive positions within the Company and including 10 years as CEO, enables him to provide important insights regarding our operations, including finance, marketing, strategic planning and management.

D. Mell Meredith Frazier	Vice-Chairman, Meredith Corporation

	Ms. Frazier, 60, has been a member of the Board since 2000 and was elected Vice-Chairman in 2010. She is Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee. She is also the Chairman of the Board of the Meredith Corporation Foundation. Ms. Frazier began her career at Meredith in 1976, holding various positions throughout the Company, including editorial, financial, marketing and production positions in publishing; acquisition and financial analysis in broadcasting and various corporate staff positions through 2003. As a fourth-generation member of the Meredith family, she holds a deep appreciation of the values and societal roles of the Company throughout its history. In addition,

Table of Contents

her previous service as an employee in various positions throughout the Company allows her to share a singular perspective with the Board.

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees for director, as listed above. Unless you specify otherwise, the accompanying proxy will be voted FOR the nominees named above.

Directors Continuing in Office as Class I Directors – Terms to Expire in 2017


Philip A. Marineau		Partner, LNK Partners

		Mr. Marineau, ~~67,~~69, has been a member of the Board ~~of Directors~~ since 1998 and currently serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee. In October 2008 he became a partner at LNK Partners, a private equity firm based in White Plains, New York. He retired from Levi Strauss & Co. in November 2006, where he served as President and CEO from September 1999. His prior service includes terms as an executive officer at PepsiCo, Dean Foods Company and Quaker Oats Co. Mr. Marineau served as a Director of Shutterfly, Inc. from April 2007 to June 2016. Mr. Marineau has an extensive record of achievement in consumer products marketing and management. ~~He is currently Chairman of the Board of Shutterfly, Inc., a position he has held since February 2007.~~ Mr. Marineau’s consumer products and marketing experience provides important insight and guidance to our management team and the Board ~~of Directors~~ and is instrumental to the development of our overall business strategy.

Elizabeth E. Tallett		~~Principal, Hunter Partners, LLC~~ Healthcare Industry Consultant

		Ms. Tallett, ~~65,~~67, was first elected to the Board ~~of Directors~~ in 2008 and serves on the Nominating/Governance and Compensation Committees. ~~Since~~From 2002 ~~she has been~~to 2014, Ms. Tallett was Principal atof Hunter Partners, LLC, a ~~firm which provides~~ management ~~services to life science businesses, including~~company for early to mid-stage pharmaceutical, biotech and medical device companies. She continues to operate as a consultant to early stage pharmaceutical and healthcare companies. In addition to serving on the ~~Meredith~~ Board, ~~of Directors,~~ Ms. Tallett serves on the Boards of The Principal Financial Group, Inc., serving as the Lead Director and on the Executive, Human Resources and Nominating/Governance Committees; Qiagen, N.V., serving on the Audit and ~~Wellpoint,~~Compensation Committees; and Anthem, Inc., serving as Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee and on the Compensation Committee. During

~~Table of Contents~~


		the past five years, she was also a director at the following public companies: Varian, Inc.; Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc.; Coventry Health Care, Inc.; IntegraMed America, Inc.; and Immunicon, Inc. In addition to her leadership and financial management in pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms, she brings executive-level experience in multinational companies, international operations, economics, strategic planning, marketing, product development and acquisitions and mergers.

Donald A. Baer		Worldwide ~~Chairman~~Chair and CEO, Burson-Marsteller

		Mr. Baer, ~~60,~~62, was ~~nominated to stand for election~~elected to the Board ~~of Directors~~ in ~~August~~November 2014. He serves as ~~Chairman~~Worldwide Chair and CEO for Burson-Marsteller, a strategic communications firm and as Chairman of Penn, Schoen & Berland, a research firm, both WPP, Inc. companies. Mr. Baer has been a member of ~~Burson-Marsteller’s~~Burson- Marsteller’s global senior management team since 2008. Mr. Baer also serves as Vice Chair of the Board of Directors of the U.S. Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Previously, Mr. Baer was Sr. Executive Vice President for Strategy and Development and an executive committee member of Discovery ~~Communications, and prior~~Communications. Prior to this position, Mr. Baer served as White House Senior Advisor to President Bill Clinton. Mr. Baer brings a broad and deep understanding of the media and marketing industries, strategic communications, strategy and development and governmental policy.

~~The Board recommends a vote FOR each~~Table of ~~the nominees for director, as listed above. Unless you specify otherwise, the accompanying proxy will be voted FOR the nominees named above.~~Contents

~~Nominee for Election~~Directors Continuing in Office as a Class II ~~Director - Term~~Directors – Terms to Expire in ~~2015~~2018

Joel W. Johnson		Former Chairman and CEO, Hormel Foods Corporation
~~Donald C. Berg~~		~~Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Brown-Forman Corporation~~

		Mr. ~~Berg, 59,~~Johnson, 73, has been a member of the Board since 1994. He serves as Chairman of ~~Directors~~the Finance Committee and is a member of the Nominating/Governance Committee. Mr. Johnson retired as Chairman of the Board of Hormel Foods Corporation in December 2006. Mr. Johnson’s tenure as Chairman and CEO of Hormel, a public company with global operations, provided him with directly relevant operating experience. In addition, his prior service on the Boards of Ecolab, Inc. from 1996 to 2016 and U.S. Bancorp from 1999 to 2016 has provided him with significant public company board experience.

Frederick B. Henry		President, The Bohen Foundation

		Mr. Henry, 70, has served on the Board since 1969. He is currently the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating/Governance Committee. Mr. Henry has been President of The Bohen Foundation, a private charitable foundation that supports the arts, since 1985. During his tenure as a director, Mr. Henry has served on every standing committee of the Board and he brings an invaluable understanding of each committee’s work to the Board as a whole.

Donald C. Berg		Former Chief Financial Officer, Brown-Forman Corporation

		Mr. Berg, 61, has been a member of the Board since 2012 and is a member of the Finance Committee and Audit Committee. HeMr. Berg recently retired as ~~Chief Financial Officer~~the CEO of ~~Brown-Forman~~The Comfy Cow, a privately-held purveyor of specialty gourmet ice cream through its chain of retail shops as well as in fine grocery stores in the Midwest. Prior to The Comfy Cow, Mr. Berg was CFO of Brown- Forman Corporation, a family-controlled public company, inuntil April 2014. In addition to his role as CFO, during his 25 year career at Brown-Forman, Mr. Berg held various executive positions, including President of its emerging market division, President of its largest operating group, the Americas, the head of its strategic planning function and the director of its mergers and acquisitions group. Prior to Brown-Forman he has had a wide variety of finance, sales, marketing and international experience with respected national and international firms after beginning his career as a ~~CPA~~Certified Public Accountant with Ernst & Whinney. Mr. Berg is actively involved in various community activities in Louisville, KY and is currently the co-chair for the Presidential Search Committee for Bellarmine University and is also Chair of the Brown Cancer Center in Louisville, KY. Mr. Berg joined the Board of Directors of Gildan Activewear in February 2015, serving as a ~~private investor in~~member of the Audit and ~~consultant to early-stage businesses. The Board believes that he~~Finance Committee and the Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Committee. He provides ~~additional~~ financial expertise, strategic development and international business experience to the Board.

~~The Board recommends a vote FOR this nominee for director, as listed above. Unless you specify otherwise, the accompanying proxy will be voted FOR the nominee named above.~~

~~Directors Continuing in Office as Class II Directors – Terms to Expire in 2015~~


~~Joel W. Johnson~~		~~Former Chairman and CEO, Hormel Foods Corporation~~

		Mr. Johnson, 71, has been a member of Meredith’s Board of Directors since 1994. He serves as Chairman of the Finance Committee and is a member of the Nominating/Governance Committee. Mr. Johnson retired as Chairman of the Board of Hormel Foods Corporation (“Hormel”) in December 2006. He currently serves on the Boards of Ecolab, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Johnson’s tenure as Chairman and CEO of Hormel, a public company with global operations, provided him with directly relevant operating experience. In addition, his service on the Boards of Hormel, Ecolab, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp has provided him with significant public company board experience.

~~Table of Contents~~


~~Frederick B. Henry~~		~~President, the Bohen Foundation~~

		Mr. Henry, 68, has served on the Company’s Board of Directors since 1969. He is currently the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating/Governance Committee. Mr. Henry has been President of The Bohen Foundation, a private charitable foundation that supports the arts, since 1985. During his tenure as a director Mr. Henry has served on every standing committee of the Board and he brings an invaluable understanding of each committee’s work to the Board as a whole.

~~Directors Continuing in Office as Class III Directors – Terms to Expire in 2016~~


~~Stephen M. Lacy~~		~~Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Meredith Corporation~~

		Mr. Lacy, 60, is Chairman of the Board and CEO of Meredith and was elected to his current position on February 1, 2010. Mr. Lacy joined Meredith in 1998 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. He was promoted to President of the National Media Group in 2000, elected to the Board and named President and Chief Operating Officer in 2004 and elected President and CEO in 2006. Mr. Lacy joined the Board of Directors of Hormel Foods Corporation in September 2011 serving as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. His intimate knowledge of our Company, gained through over 15 years of service in critical executive positions within the Company and including nine years as President, enables him to provide important insights regarding our operations, including finance, marketing, strategic planning and management.

~~D. Mell Meredith Frazier~~		~~Vice-Chairman, Meredith Corporation~~

		Ms. Frazier, 58, has been a member of the Board of Directors since 2000 and was elected Vice-Chairman in 2010. She is Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee. She is also the Chairman of the Board of the Meredith Corporation Foundation. Ms. Frazier began her career at Meredith in 1976 and held various positions throughout the Company, including editorial, financial, marketing and production positions in publishing; acquisition and financial analysis in broadcasting and various corporate staff positions through 2003. As a fourth-generation member of the Meredith family, she holds a deep appreciation of the values and societal roles of the Company throughout its history. In addition, her previous service as an employee in various positions throughout the Company allows her to share a singular perspective with the Board.

~~Mary Sue Coleman~~		~~President Emeritus, University of Michigan~~

		Dr. Coleman, 70, has been a member of Meredith’s Board of Directors since 1997 and is a member of the Audit and Finance Committees. Dr. Coleman retired in July 2014 having served as the President of the University of Michigan with its 53,000 students since August 2002. She holds academic appointments as Professor of Chemistry in the College of Literature, Sciences and the Arts and in the College of Medicine. Dr. Coleman is a member of the Board of Directors of Johnson & Johnson. Dr. Coleman’s service as President of one of the nation’s largest and most prestigious public universities allows her to bring to the Board a unique point of view regarding organizational management.

~~Involvement in Certain Proceedings~~

Mr. Joseph H. Ceryanec, our Chief Financial Officer, was named Acting Chief Financial Officer of McLeodUSA in September 2005 when both the CEO and the Chief Financial Officer left the company. In October 2005, McLeodUSA filed a prepackaged petition for bankruptcy. McLeodUSA emerged from bankruptcy in January 2006. Mr. Ceryanec was named Chief Financial Officer at McLeodUSA in February 2006 and served in that position through early 2008.

~~Table of Contents~~

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Company was founded upon service to our customers and we are committed to building value for our shareholders. Our products and services continue to distinguish themselves on the basis of quality, customer service and value that can be trusted. Consistent with these principles, Meredith strives to uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct, to be a leader in corporate governance, to report results with accuracy and transparency, and to maintain full compliance with the laws, rules and regulations that govern Meredith’s businesses.

Board Leadership Structure

The Company’s businesses are overseen by the Board ~~of Directors~~ which currently has ~~eight~~nine members. There is one member of management on the Board and the remaining ~~seven~~eight directors are independent directors. The Board has four standing committees, namely Audit, Compensation, Nominating/Governance and Finance, all of which are comprised entirely of independent directors. Each committee has its own charter and the ~~chair~~chairman of each committee reports to the Board at each regular meeting.

Table of Contents

The Board ~~of Directors~~ has no specific policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chairman and CEO. The Board believes this issue is part of the succession planning process and that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board to make this determination on a periodic basis. Our current Board leadership structure combines these roles, with Mr. Lacy acting as Chairman and CEO. In addition, the Board elected Ms. Frazier, an independent director under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, to serve as Vice-Chairman and as Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee. Ms. Frazier presides at the executive sessions of non-management directors and executive sessions of independent directors. Each year the Nominating/Governance Committee recommends its nominees for Chairman of the Board, ~~and~~ members and ~~chairs~~chairman for each standing committee.

Mr. Lacy has primary responsibility for managing the Company’s ~~businesses;~~businesses, designing, developing and establishing strategic plans and providing leadership to the management team, all subject to the Board’s direction and review. As Chairman of the Board, Mr. Lacy is the key link between the Board and other members of management, as well as between the Board and the Company’s shareholders. Because of his day-to-day knowledge of the Company’s operations and challenges in his role as CEO, he is ~~well-suited~~well- suited to provide leadership to the Board and guide its deliberations and activities.

As Vice-Chairman, Ms. Frazier works closely with the Chairman to ensure that the Board’s procedures, processes and communications reflect sound corporate governance. She chairs executive sessions of the independent, non-management directors and counsels collectively and individually with the members of the Board to utilize their individual capabilities to the Board’s best advantage. She collaborates with the Chairman to organize and establish the Board agenda, works to ensure there is sufficient time for discussion of agenda items and oversees the circulation of timely and relevant information to directors. The Board ~~of Directors~~ believes at this time this leadership structure enhances Board effectiveness in performing its oversight role and furthers the policies and procedures of the Board.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Risk is an integral part of the Board and committee deliberations throughout the year. The Board is responsible for and oversees the Company’s risk management process through regular discussion of the Company’s risks with management both during and outside of regularly scheduled Board meetings. The Board considers, as appropriate, risks, among other factors, in reviewing the Company’s strategy, business plan, budgets and major transactions. Each of the Board’s committees assists the Board in overseeing the management of the Company’s risks within the areas delegated to the committee. The Company uses an enterprise risk management framework to ensure that key risk areas are identified and that oversight responsibility is assigned to the appropriate Board committee and management. Each committee has a charter that lists such committee’s designated areas of responsibility for specific risk areas that might impact the Company. Board committees make regular reports addressing risk oversight to the Board at its meetings. The full Board also receives periodic information about the Company’s risk areas and initiatives for addressing those risks. In addition, future risks are anticipated and discussed as part of the strategic planning process.

At least quarterly, the Audit Committee discusses with management, corporate counsel, the Company’s Director of Internal Audit and the Company’s independent external auditor: current business trends affecting the Company that may impact risk; litigation and ethics compliance matters; ~~the~~ risk exposures facing the Company; ~~the~~ steps management has taken to monitor and control such risk factors (including a subcertification program in which senior and middle managers attest to review and approval of financial disclosures with respect to which they have some responsibility) and the adequacy of internal controls that could materially affect the Company’s financial statements. As part of this process, the Company’s ~~director~~Director of ~~internal audit~~Internal Audit interviews key executives regarding business strategies and areas of risk faced by the Company and its business segments. The ~~Chair~~Chairman of the Audit Committee reports to the Board at each meeting concerning its risk oversight activities.

~~Table of Contents~~

The Compensation Committee oversees risks related to the Company’s compensation programs and policies and reviews management’s periodic reports on such risks. ~~Since 2010, the~~The Compensation Committee ~~has engaged~~engages Willis Towers Watson & Co. (“Willis Towers Watson”) to work with the Company’s Director of Internal Audit as well as the Company’s human resources and legal departments to develop a framework to assess the specific risks associated with the Company’s compensation programs. The framework was designed to evaluate the key elements of the Company’s compensation programs to determine whether such programs could reasonably be expected to have or create a material adverse effect on the Company. As part of this framework, the Company’s pay philosophy, incentive plan designs, performance metrics and pay plan governance process were considered. Based on the results of the annual assessment, management and the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Willis Towers Watson and the Company’s internal audit and legal advisors, have concluded that any risks associated with the Company’s compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board ~~of Directors~~ has adopted the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (“Guidelines”), charters for each of the Board committees, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers. These documents are posted on the Investor Relations/Corporate Governance section of the Meredith web site, www.meredith.com, and are available upon written request to the Secretary of the Company, 1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3023.

Director Independence

Because certain members of the Meredith family, acting as a group, control more than 50% of the voting power of Meredith, the Company is a “Controlled Company” and need not comply with the requirements for a majority of independent directors or for independent compensation and nominating/corporate governance committees. Our Board ~~of Directors~~ has, nevertheless, determined to comply in all respects with the NYSE rules relating to non-controlled companies. The Board currently does not have any categorical standards to assist it in determining the independence of its members other than those expressly set forth in the NYSE rules.

For purposes of the NYSE listing standards, the Board ~~of Directors~~ has determined that each of the following directors and/or nominees has no material relationship with the Company (directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company) and, accordingly, is independent:

Donald A. Baer
Donald C. Berg	Mary Sue Coleman	~~Joel W. Johnson~~
D. Mell Meredith Frazier	Frederick B. Henry	Joel W. Johnson
Philip A. Marineau	Elizabeth E. Tallett

Nominations for Director

Director nominees are selected by the Nominating/Governance Committee in accordance with the policies and principles of its charter and the Guidelines. The Committee considers independence, diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The Committee will consider shareholder recommendations for directors that comply with the requirements set forth in the section entitled “SUBMITTING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS” which appears later in this Proxy Statement. For additional information, please see “Committees of the Board” which appears later in this Proxy Statement.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

Non-management directors meet in executive session at least quarterly. The ~~Chair~~Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee presides at these executive sessions.

Communications with the Board

Interested parties and shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board and/or the non-management directors should address their communication to: Board of Directors, Meredith Corporation, c/o Office of the General Counsel, 1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3023. Mail addressed in this manner will be forwarded to the Chairman of the Board. Shareholders may also deliver such communication by telephone at 1-866-457-7445 or at https://www.integrity-helpline.com/ meredith.jsp.

Table of Contents

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board

The Board has a majority of directors who meet the criteria for independence established by the NYSE. The responsibility of the directors is to exercise their business judgment to act in what they reasonably believe to be the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Directors are expected to attend Board meetings and meetings of the committees on which they serve and to spend the time needed and meet as frequently as necessary to properly discharge their responsibilities.

The Board had four regularly scheduled meetings during fiscal ~~2014,~~2016, as did the Audit, Compensation, Finance and Nominating/ Governance Committees. In addition, the Audit Committee had four special meetings and the Board had ~~three~~eight special meetings. All current directors attended more than 75% of the meetings of the full Board and the respective committees on which they served during fiscal ~~2014.~~2016. The Company policy is that all directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All directors attended the November ~~6, 2013~~11, 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Director Stock Ownership

All directors are expected to own stock in the Company. ~~The Board approved an increase in the stock ownership requirements for non-employee directors in fiscal 2011.~~ Within ~~five years of July 1, 2010 (or~~ five years from their initial appointment or election to the Board, ~~for subsequently appointed or elected directors),~~ each non-employee director is expected to own 7,500 shares of common stock or a number of shares of common stock equal to three times the value of non-employee director annual compensation, whichever is less. The value of shares for ownership purposes will be determined using a 200-day average stock price.

Restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and stock equivalent units (“SEUs”) count toward the required ownership but stock options do not. All of our current directors have met or exceeded, or for the directors who have been on the Board for less than five years, are on track to meet or exceed the ownership requirement. For additional information on stock ownership by our officers and directors, please see the section entitled “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT” in this Proxy Statement.

Committees of the Board

The Guidelines require the Board to have a Nominating/Governance Committee, an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee and further provide that the Board may establish additional committees as necessary or appropriate. The Board has also established a Finance Committee. Each committee has its own charter setting forth the qualifications for membership on the committee and the purposes, goals and responsibilities of the committee. Each of these committees has the power to hire independent legal, financial or other advisors as it deems necessary, without consulting or obtaining the approval of any officer of the Company in advance. The charter for each committee is available on the Company’s web site at www.meredith.com by first clicking on ~~“Corporate,”~~“Investors”, then on ~~“Corp~~“Corporate Governance,” then ~~on “Board Committees”~~scroll down the page and finally clicking on the “pdf” symbol next to the committee name. The charter of each committee is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it. The table below shows the current membership for each of the standing Board committees:


Audit Committee	Compensation Committee	Finance Committee	Nominating/Governance Committee
Donald ~~C. Berg~~ A. Baer	D. Mell Meredith Frazier	Donald ~~C. Berg~~ A. Baer	D. Mell Meredith Frazier*
Donald C. Berg	Frederick B. Henry*	Donald C. Berg	Frederick B. Henry
Mary Sue Coleman	Frederick B. Henry* Philip A. Marineau	Mary Sue Coleman	~~Frederick B. Henry~~ Joel W. Johnson
Philip A. Marineau*	~~Philip A. Marineau~~ Elizabeth E. Tallett	Joel W. Johnson*	~~Joel W. Johnson~~
	Elizabeth E. Tallett		~~Elizabeth E. Tallett~~

*Committee Chair


*Committee Chairman	1.

Audit ~~Committee.~~Committee. The Committee is composed entirely of non-employee directors, each of whom meets the “independence” requirements of the NYSE listing standards, as well as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to our Audit Committee Charter, each member of the Committee, in addition to meeting the “independence” requirement, must be “financially literate” as contemplated under the NYSE rules. Furthermore, the Board ~~of Directors~~ has determined that Directors Berg, ~~Craigie (July 1, 2013 - May 8, 2014, having resigned effective at adjournment of the May Quarterly Board Meeting)~~Baer and Marineau each meet the requirements to be named “audit committee financial experts” as the term has been defined by the SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities as they relate to the Company’s accounting policies and internal controls, financial reporting practices and legal and regulatory compliance. It is directly responsible for the

Table of Contents

The Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities as they relate to the Company’s accounting policies and internal controls, financial reporting practices and legal and regulatory compliance. It is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the Company’s independent auditor, also referred to as “independent registered public accounting firm,” and has sole authority to appoint or replace the independent auditor. In addition, the Committee maintains, through regularly scheduled meetings, open lines of communication between the Board ~~of Directors~~ and the Company’s financial management, internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm.

	2.
	2.	Nominating/Governance ~~Committee.~~Committee. Pursuant to the Committee’s charter, all members of this Committee are non-employee directors who meet the “independence” requirements of the NYSE listing standards. The Committee’s purpose is to: assist the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and recommend to the Board the director nominees for the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders; recommend to the Board the Corporate Governance Guidelines applicable to the Company; lead the Board in its annual review of CEO succession planning and the Board’s performance; recommend to the Board any changes in non-employee director compensation; and recommend to the Board director nominees for each committee.

Nominees for directorship may be recommended by members of the Board, shareholders or other parties. The Nominating/ Governance Committee has from time to time retained an executive recruiting firm whose function is to bring specific director candidates to the attention of the Committee. Current directors are contacted at the end of their terms concerning their willingness and intent to continue as a director. All nominees are considered in accordance with the policies and principles in the Nominating/Governance Committee Charter. The Committee is responsible for reviewing with the Board the requisite skills and characteristics of director nominees. It assesses nominees’ qualifications for independence as well as other considerations. The Committee’s first priority is to seek the most qualified and experienced candidates possible. A person considered for nomination to the Board must be a person of high integrity and ethics. While the Committee does not have a formal diversity policy, it seeks to ensure that the Board maintains an appropriate mix of experience, characteristics, skills and background to provide the Board and the Company with sound and effective input and guidance. In addition, while the Committee has not adopted a policy with respect to nominations made by shareholders, it will consider nominations that are submitted in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws. For additional information on submitting a nomination for a director, please see “SUBMITTING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS” later in this Proxy Statement.

	3.
	3.	Compensation ~~Committee.~~Committee. Pursuant to the Committee charter, all members of this Committee are non-employee directors who meet the “independence” requirements of the NYSE listing standards. The Committee has overall responsibility for evaluation and approval of officer compensation plans, policies and programs. The Committee reviews and approves corporate officers’ salaries; approves, prior to adoption, any officer or management incentive, bonus, stock plans or agreements and administers such plans as required.

	4.
	4.	Finance ~~Committee.~~Committee. The Committee advises the Board with respect to corporate financial policies and procedures, dividend policy, specific corporate financing and capital plans and annual operating and capital budgets. It also provides financial advice and counsel to management, reviews and makes recommendations to the Board ~~of Directors~~ concerning acquisitions and dispositions, appoints depositories of corporate funds and specifies conditions of deposit and withdrawal and approves corporate investment portfolios and capital expenditure requests by management within the limits established by the Board. In addition, the Committee reviews pension plan performance and approves plan documents.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors. No executive officer of the Company serves on the Board ~~of Directors~~ or Compensation Committee of any other company for which any directors of Meredith served as an executive officer at any time during fiscal ~~2014.~~2016.

PROPOSAL TWO – APPROVAL OF ADVISORY RESOLUTION
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (“SAY ON PAY”)

The Company is seeking an advisory vote from its shareholders with respect to compensation awarded to its named executive officers (“NEOs”) for fiscal ~~2014 from its shareholders.~~2016. Our executive compensation program is described in detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the related compensation tables and other narrative disclosures as required by the SEC which can be found in this Proxy Statement beginning on page 11.

~~Table of Contents~~

Since the vote on this proposal is advisory in nature, it will not affect any compensation already paid or awarded to any NEO and will not be binding on the Compensation Committee, the Board or the Company. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for approving the overall design and administering the executive compensation program, values the opinions of the

Table of Contents

shareholders and will take into account the outcome of the vote when making future executive compensation decisions. The Board ~~of Directors~~ recommends that you approve the following resolution that will be submitted for a shareholder vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in support of the Company’s executive compensation program:


	RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion which are included in the Proxy Statement for this Annual Meeting.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation program. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of this ~~item.~~item.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This section provides information regarding the compensation program in place for our CEO, ~~Chief Financial Officer~~CFO and the three other most highly compensated executive officers, collectively the NEOs, for fiscal ~~2014.~~2016. It includes information regarding, among other things, the overall objectives of our compensation program and each element of compensation that we provide.

The Compensation Committee (referred to in this Section as the “Committee”) reviews and approves the compensation of our officers and acts pursuant to a charter that has been approved by the ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. The Committee also administers various stock and other compensation-related plans provided for the benefit of our officers and other key managers.

Executive Summary

Our compensation program is designed to focus our NEOs on key business objectives and is tied to the financial performance of the Company. Our compensation philosophy and objectives provide the framework within which compensation programs are considered and decisions are made.

Fiscal ~~2014~~2016 Financial ~~Highlights~~Highlights—Fiscal 2016 was a year of strong growth in revenues and cash flow. We generated record revenues of $1.65 billion, a 3% increase over fiscal 2015. Fiscal 2016 earnings per share (“EPS”) were $0.75, which includes special items primarily related to non-cash impairments. Excluding these special items, we delivered EPS of $3.30, matching fiscal 2015 - even though we recorded $31 million - or $0.42 per share - less of incremental, high-margin political advertising revenues. Fiscal 2016 financial highlights included:

In Fiscal 2014, we aggressively executed on our Total Shareholder Return Strategy by deploying capital in high cash flow businesses and growing the amount of cash returned to our shareholders. For example, we added high quality television stations to our

Our Local Media Group ~~portfolio, executed~~delivered a ~~number~~3% increase in revenue, despite recording $31 million less in high-margin political advertising revenue, as is expected in a non-election year. Operating profit decreased 3%.

Our National Media Group revenue increased 4%, including a 6% increase in advertising revenue. Operating loss was $18 million compared to operating profit of ~~initiatives~~$123 million in the prior year, due primarily to ~~strengthen and grow our~~the non-cash impairments. Excluding special items in both years, operating profit grew 10% to $150 million.

Total Company digital advertising revenues grew more than 15%, including a 16% increase in the National Media Group and a 13% increase in the Local Media Group. Digital advertising revenues now account for more than 25% of National Media Group advertising revenues.

Fiscal 2016 business highlights included:

Expanding audiences across media platforms and increased ~~our dividend and expanded our share repurchase program. Fiscal 2014 highlights include:~~reach to Millennial women:

°
~~Strengthening~~Readership across our magazine portfolio ~~of media businesses through acquisitions and new launches. For example, we:~~

	•	~~Completed~~grew to a record 127 million, according to the ~~transaction to buy the broadcast assets of stations~~~~KTVK-TV, an independent station in Phoenix, the nation’s 12~~^th~~largest television market and KMOV-TV, the CBS affiliate in St. Louis, the nation’s 21~~^st ~~largest television market. We also executed an agreement to purchase the assets of WGGB-TV, the ABC affiliate in Springfield, Massachusetts, which is subject to regulatory approval.~~

	•	~~Successfully launched Allrecipes magazine~~~~, which Media Industry Newsletter called the “Hottest Launch of the Year.”~~

	•	~~Strengthened our parenthood activities by integrating the Parenting and Baby Talk brands~~~~that we acquired late in fiscal 2013.~~

~~Growing revenues and operating profit from activities that are not dependent on advertising~~. We delivered significant growth in retransmission-related revenues and profit in our Local Media Group. Within our National Media Group, we grew revenues related to circulation and brand licensing, which helped offset the 6% decline in advertising revenues, and within Meredith Xcelerated Marketing grew operating profit and solidified its relationship with its Top 10 clients.

~~Proving the effectiveness of advertising on both broadcast and print platforms~~~~. Broadcast television continues to demonstrate its unique effectiveness for local advertisers as we delivered 8% growth in Local Media Group non-~~ Spring 2016 GfK Mediamark Research & Intelligence Report.

Table of Contents

Traffic to our digital sites increased to more than 80 million monthly unique visitors.

Our reach to U.S. Millennial women grew by 9% to 72% of American female Millennials.

Meredith’s multi-channel reach among American women hit an all-time high of 102 million. Additionally, Meredith’s database has grown to 125 million American consumers.


°	~~political advertising. Our National Media Group was named “~~~~Advertisers’ Favorite Media Company”~~ ~~for the second time in four years by Advertiser Perceptions, which annually surveys thousands of leading advertising agencies and marketers.~~

	~~Additionally, in fiscal 2014 we again successfully executed~~In our ~~Total Shareholder Return (TSR) strategy~~~~. We increased our dividend 6%, our 21~~^st ~~consecutive year of increases, repurchased approximately 1.6 million~~television portfolio, nine of our ~~shares,~~stations ranked No. 1 or No. 2 in late news, and ~~authorized an additional $100 million for~~eight stations ranked No. 1 or No. 2 in morning news, according to the May 2016 rating book data compiled by Nielsen.

These audience metrics are followed closely by our ~~share repurchase program.~~

advertising clients, who use them to inform advertising rates and their return on advertising across our brands.

Growing magazine, digital and non-political television advertising revenue. National Media Group magazine advertising revenues grew in the mid-single digits, and digital advertising was up in the mid-teens. Local Media Group non-political advertising revenues also increased in the mid-single digits, and digital advertising was up in the mid-teens.

Increasing revenues from businesses not dependent on traditional advertising. Our brand licensing activities delivered record performance in fiscal 2016 and are now ranked No. 2 in the world, according to License! Global magazine. Additionally, our Local Media Group delivered growth in retransmission consent fees and contribution by renewing retransmission consent agreements with pay television providers.

Continuing strong execution of our Total Shareholder Return strategy. We grew our dividend for the 23rd-straight year, increasing it in February by 8% to $1.98 per share on an annualized basis. We have paid an annual dividend for 69 straight years, and it is currently yielding approximately 4%. We also strengthened our balance sheet by paying down $100 million of debt.

The Committee evaluated our Company’s fiscal ~~2014~~2016 financial results and the financial and non-financial strategic objectives of each NEO in assessing overall performance results for purposes of our short-term incentive plan. Results from our corporate financial metrics ~~were slightly below~~exceeded target level of performance for two of the three performance metrics and was 98.6% of targeted performance on the third performance objective under our short-term incentive plan. Our Local Media Group exceeded the target performance goals on ~~two of~~all the ~~relevant group metrics and was close to target on the third under the plan established by the Committee. Finally, with the decline in advertising revenues in our~~business unit performance metrics. The National Media Group exceeded the targeted level of performance for two of the three performance ~~results were within~~metrics and was 97.1% of targeted performance on the ~~targeted level of~~third performance ~~established for the group under the short-term incentive plan.~~

As a result of financial, operational and individual performance, short-term incentive plan payouts for our NEOs, as a percentage of their target incentive, ranged from 81% to 126%. Due primarily to lower than anticipated National Media Group advertising revenues, NEO annual incentive payouts were approximately 77% of the prior years payouts. The overall payout for the NEOs under the three-year Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Cash LTIP”) was 66.4% of target. Our equity-based incentives consist of stock options and restricted shares to provide a strong link to shareholder interests with grant values to our NEOs generally consistent with prior year amounts.metric.

Say-on-Pay Vote

In ~~2013,~~2015, we provided shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory Say-on-Pay vote on our compensation programs and the compensation awarded to our NEOs. ~~Ninety~~Seventy-seven percent ~~(90%~~(77%) of the votes cast supported the Say-on-Pay proposal. The percentage represents a decrease from prior fiscal year’s Say-on-Pay affirmative vote ~~by shareholders affirms our belief that our executive compensation programs, policies and compensation levels are appropriate.~~of 89%. The Committee ~~considers~~will continue to consider the results of the shareholder advisory vote when evaluating and establishing executive compensation programs and compensation levels of our ~~NEOs.~~NEOs for fiscal 2017.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation philosophy has the following objectives:

	1.
	1.	To align the interests of the NEOs with those of shareholders through performance-based compensation, which links both short and long-term compensation to business results;

	2.
	2.	To provide compensation opportunities that are competitive in the marketplace in which we conduct our businesses, in order to attract, retain and motivate top caliber executives;

	3.
	3.	To provide the opportunity to earn greater levels of compensation if superior operating performance and shareholder returns are achieved;

	4.
	4.	To design incentives that balance the need to meet and exceed annual operating plans with the need for long-term business growth and to provide superior shareholder ~~returns,~~returns; and

	5.
	5.	To provide clear and measurable objectives for executive performance.

Table of Contents

We strive to link executive compensation to the performance of the Company. For example, our short-term incentive program delivers incentives on the basis of performance over a one-year period and is tied directly to operating performance. Similarly, the long-term incentive program may include grants of stock options, restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock, ~~restricted stock units (“RSUs”),~~RSUs, performance-based RSUs and cash under a long-term incentive plan (“Cash ~~LTIPs~~LTIP”), which are tied to specific performance goals. At the beginning of each fiscal year, ~~for the short and long-term incentive plans,~~ the Committee identifies performance metrics, establishes minimums, targets and maximums and determines weightings for each of the corporate, business unit and individual ~~goals.~~goals for the short and long-term incentive plans.

Our compensation program for NEOs is designed so that a significant portion of their total compensation will be delivered in the form of variable annual cash incentives and long-term incentives subject to Company, business unit and individual performance. In setting each compensation element, the Committee evaluates both the external market data provided by its compensation consultant and internal pay equity considerations.

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company attempts to create a compensation program for its NEOs that delivers total compensation between the median and 75th percentile of companies in its Compensation Peer Group (“Peer Group”). The Peer Group includes CCiHeart Media, ~~Holdings,~~ Inc.; Emmis Communications Corporation; Gannett Co., Inc.; Lee Enterprises, Incorporated; Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.; ~~McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc.;~~ Media General, Inc.; The E. W. Scripps Company; Scripps ~~Network~~Networks Interactive; Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.; Graham Holdings Company; Time Inc.; and ~~The Washington Post~~Tribune Media Company. The Committee considers several factors before including companies in the Peer Group. Those factors include companies with similar product lines, similar business strategies, comparable revenues and comparable market capitalization. Due to the dynamics of the competitive marketplace, with companies being acquired, product lines divested and growth occurring through acquisitions, the Committee ~~periodically~~regularly reviews the Peer Group and makes changes to account for these events. For fiscal 2016, McGraw Hill Financial, Inc. (rebranded S&P Global Inc., in April 2016) was removed as the company no longer met the criteria for the Peer Group. Time Inc. and Tribune Media Company were selected as additions to the Peer Group based on relevant industry classifications and revenue size.

In addition to publicly-filed Peer Group information, the Committee reviewed ~~salary~~compensation survey data prepared by Willis Towers Watson, the Committee’s outside compensation consultant. In the report, Willis Towers Watson provided data on base salary, annual non-equity incentives (bonuses), long-term incentives and total direct compensation (the sum of base salary, annual non-equity incentives and long-term incentives) for executives in comparable positions at other publicly traded companies. As part of the published survey analysis, Willis Towers Watson utilized the ~~2012/2013~~2015 Willis Towers Watson Top Management Survey, ~~2012~~2015 Mercer Executive Benchmark Database and ~~2012~~2015 Willis Towers Watson Executive Compensation Database. These surveys included industry-specific data and data from organizations similar in revenue size to Meredith.

The Elements of Our Compensation Program

This section describes the elements of our compensation program for our NEOs, together with a discussion of various matters relating to those items, including a rationale for the Company’s decision to include the items in the compensation program.

	1.
	1.	Cash Compensation. Salary is included in our NEO compensation package because the Committee believes it is appropriate that a portion of the compensation provided to NEOs be in a form that is fixed and appropriate for the skills and experience required for the position. Performance-based cash incentives are included in the package because they permit the Committee to motivate our NEOs to pursue particular objectives the Committee believes are consistent with the overall goals and strategic direction the Board has set for the Company. The components comprising the cash portion of total compensation are described further below.

	A.
		A.	Base Salary. Base salary for NEOs is generally determined by the Committee at its meeting in ~~August.~~August (which is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 21. Changes in base salary on a year-over-year basis are dependent on the Committee’s assessment of ~~the~~ Company, business unit and individual performance. The Committee ~~can set~~sets NEO salaries at the level it deems appropriate, unless a minimum salary has been specified in an employment agreement. In evaluating salaries, the Committee is mindful of its overall goal to keep target cash compensation for ~~its~~ executive officers between the median and the 75th percentile of cash compensation paid by companies in our Peer Group. Cash compensation provided in the form of salary is less than the total amount provided under our short-term and long-term incentive programs, each of which is described below. This weighting reflects the Committee’s objective of ensuring that a substantial amount of each NEO’s total compensation is tied to Company, business unit and individual performance goals.

	B.
		B.	Short-Term Incentive Programs. The ~~Amended and Restated Meredith Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan” or the “Plan”) provides the~~ CEO and other executive officers ~~with an~~are awarded annual non-equity ~~incentive~~incentives (the “Annual ~~Incentive”~~Incentives”) to attain established financial and overall performance targets. For fiscal ~~2014,~~2016, the ~~Committee changed the incentive target for Mr. Thomas H. Harty, President-National Media Group from 75%~~

Table of Contents

Committee did not adjust the incentive target payouts as a percent of base salary for any NEOs. In establishing the Annual Incentive target awards and goals, the Committee considers several factors including:

Financial and business-related goals which are key to the Company’s success;

Positioning the Company for continued strategic growth including the expansion of our digital platform;

The desire to ensure, as described above, that a substantial portion of total compensation is performance- based;

The relative importance in any given year of the short-term and long-term performance goals;

The qualitative objectives set for NEOs;

The advice of the independent compensation consultant regarding compensation practices at other companies in the Peer Group;

The target amounts set and actual incentives paid in recent years; and

The results of the annual shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation programs.

In 2016, consistent with prior years, 80% ~~of base salary based on external competitive market data and internal pay equity considerations. Eighty (80%)~~ of the Annual Incentive target for each NEO was based on specific financial targets. The remaining 20% related to predetermined measurable and qualitative strategic organizational objectives.


	~~In establishing the Annual Incentive target awards and goals, the Committee considers several factors including:~~

	•		~~Financial and business-related goals which are key to our Company’s success;~~

	•		~~Positioning the Company for continued strategic growth including the expansion of our digital platform;~~

	•		The ~~desire to ensure, as described above, that a substantial portion of total compensation is performance-based;~~

	•		~~The relative importance in any given year of the short-term and long-term performance goals;~~

	•		~~The qualitative objectives set for NEOs;~~

~~Table of Contents~~


	•		~~The advice of the independent compensation consultant regarding compensation practices at other companies in the Peer Group;~~

	•		~~The target amounts set and actual incentives paid in recent years; and~~

	•		~~The results of the annual shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation programs.~~


	~~In fiscal 2014, the~~2016 performance objectives for the NEOs generally included the following, depending upon each officer’s role in the Company:

Financial Objectives. Financial objectives include EPS; operating cash flow; revenue; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) from acquisition activity; other cost-saving initiatives and certain group financial measures;

Board or CEO Evaluation of Individual Performance. Each NEO has individual non-financial objectives as a component of the Short-Term Incentive Program. In determining the NEO’s performance for these objectives, the Committee considers several factors including the following:

°
•	Financial Objectives. Financial objectives include earnings per share (“EPS”); operating cash flow; revenue; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) from acquisition activity; other cost-saving initiatives and certain group financial measures;

•	Board or CEO Evaluation of Individual Performance. Each NEO has individual non-financial objectives as a component of the Short-Term Incentive Program. In determining the NEO’s performance for these objectives, the Committee considers several factors including the following:

	o	The impact the NEO had on developing and executing the Company’s business strategy and maximizing market share;

°
	o	Management of the business unit’s operating performance and expenses for the fiscal year;

°
	o	Execution against the Company’s strategic planning ~~initiatives~~initiatives; and

	°
			o	Integration of acquisitions, subsidiaries or technologies to enhance operating results.

Management, including the NEOs, develops preliminary recommendations based upon the business plan for performance goals and specific financial targets. The Committee reviews management’s preliminary recommendations and establishes final goals. The Committee strives to ensure that the incentive awards are consistent with the strategic goals set by the Board, that the goals are sufficiently ambitious to provide meaningful incentives, and that amounts paid, assuming target levels of performance are attained, will be consistent with the overall NEO compensation philosophy established by the Committee. Each NEO’s specific objectives are weighted according to the extent to which the executive is responsible for delivering results on those objectives. The weightings assigned to the objectives for each NEO for fiscal 2016 are shown in the following table.
	Management, including the NEOs, develops preliminary recommendations based upon the business plan for performance goals and specific financial targets. The Committee reviews management’s preliminary recommendations and establishes final goals. The Committee strives to ensure that the incentive awards are consistent with the strategic goals set by the Board, that the goals are sufficiently ambitious to provide meaningful incentives and that amounts paid, assuming target levels of performance are attained, will be consistent with the overall NEO compensation philosophy established by the Committee.

	Each NEO’s specific objectives are weighted according to the extent to which the executive is responsible for delivering results on those objectives. The weightings assigned to the objectives for each NEO for fiscal 2014 are shown in the table below.

	~~Weightings Assigned in Fiscal 2014 to Each Performance Objective for the NEOs~~

Objective

Lacy

Ceryanec

Harty

Karpowicz

Zieser

EPS

35%

35%

20%

20%

25%

Operating Cash Flow(1)

25%

15%

5%

5%

15%

Company Revenue

20%

20%

20%

Group Operating Earnings

25%

25%

Group Operating Cash Flow

10%

10%

Group Operating Revenue

20%

20%

Development Contribution – EBITDA

20%

Capital Expenditure Management

10%

Individual Strategic Objectives

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

Table of Contents

The Committee set the following goals for fiscal 2014:

Minimum ($)

Target ($)

Maximum ($)

EPS

2.56

2.85

3.14

Corporate Group

Operating Cash Flow(1)

144,000,000

160,000,000

176,000,000

Company Revenue

1,443,981,000

1,519,980,000

1,595,979,000

Development Contribution – EBITDA

6,000,000

7,000,000

8,500,000

Capital Expenditure Management

28,875,000

27,500,000

24,750,000

National Media Group

Operating Earnings

110,700,000

123,000,000

135,300,000

Cash Flow

87,750,000

97,500,000

107,250,000

Revenue

935,493,500

984,730,000

1,033,966,500

Local Media Group

Operating Earnings

105,300,000

117,000,000

128,700,000

Cash Flow

110,250,000

122,500,000

134,750,000

Revenue

367,517,950

386,861,000

406,204,050

Weightings Assigned in Fiscal 2016 to Each Performance Objective for the NEOs

Objective	Lacy	Ceryanec	Harty	Karpowicz	Zieser
EPS	35%	35%	20%	20%	25%
Operating Cash Flow(1)	25%	15%	5%	5%	15%
Company Revenue	20%	20%			20%
Group Operating Earnings			25%	25%
Group Operating Cash Flow			10%	10%
Group Operating Revenue			20%	20%
Development Contribution - EBITDA		10%			20%
Individual Strategic Objectives	20%	20%	20%	20%	20%

(1) Operating cash flow for Annual Incentive target purposes is measured on a non-GAAP basis. The primary difference is that cash flow for Annual Incentives is reduced by capital expenditures.

Additionally, each NEO had 20% of his Annual Incentive tied to specific individual strategic performance objectives in the general categories of strategy development and execution, corporate development and people development, operating initiatives and succession planning.

The Annual Incentive payout for the NEOs ranges from 50% of target if the minimum levels of performance are achieved, up to 250% of target for achieving or exceeding the maximum performance level. The payouts are linear between minimum and target and between target and maximum.

The Committee set the following goals for fiscal 2016. At its quarterly meetings, the Committee reviews Company financial performance results and the progress of the NEOs toward meeting the quantitative goals established for the fiscal year. At its August 2016 meeting, the Committee reviewed and approved the fiscal 2016 performance results and incentive awards for the CEO and each NEO. The results for fiscal 2016 were:

	Minimum ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Actual Results ($)
EPS		2.79		3.10		3.41		3.30
Corporate Group
Operating Cash Flow(1)		144,000,000		160,000,000		176,000,000		181,800,000
Company Revenue		1,589,422,200		1,673,076,000		1,756,729,800		1,649,628,000
Development Contribution - EBITDA (2)		8,000,000		9,000,000		10,500,000		12,562,000
National Media Group
Operating Earnings		135,000,000		150,000,000		165,000,000		150,170,000
Cash Flow		99,000,000		110,000,000		121,000,000		126,300,000
Revenue		1,077,085,300		1,133,774,000		1,190,462,700		1,101,183,000
Local Media Group
Operating Earnings		132,750,000		147,500,000		162,250,000		158,771,000
Cash Flow		144,000,000		160,000,000		176,000,000		186,100,000
Revenue		512,336,900		539,302,000		566,267,100		548,445,000

(1) Operating cash flow for Annual Incentive target purposes is measured on a non-GAAP basis. The primary difference is that cash flow for Annual Incentives is reduced by capital expenditures.

(2) Includes acquisitions and/or new agreements that result in actual incremental EBITDA for current fiscal year and forecast results for next fiscal year.

For Fiscal 2016, based on financial and operational results, the Committee approved the Annual Incentive awards for the NEOs shown in the following table:

	Target Award				Actual Award
NEO	($)		% of Salary		($)		% of Target
Stephen M. Lacy		1,150,000		115		2,123,532		185
Joseph H. Ceryanec		413,000		70		812,652		197
Thomas H. Harty		646,000		85		923,373		143
Paul A. Karpowicz		616,250		85		1,134,483		184
John S. Zieser		465,500		70		844,374		181


15	The Committee, at its quarterly meetings, reviewed Company financial performance results, the progress of the NEOs toward meeting the quantitative goals established for the fiscal year and approved the final incentive awards for the CEO and each NEO at its August 2014 meeting. The results for fiscal 2014 were:

Target ($)

Actual ($)

Level Achieved

EPS

2.85

2.77

Between Minimum and Target

Corporate

Operating Cash Flow(1)

160,000,000

155,993,000

Between Minimum and Target

Company Revenue

1,519,800,000

1,450,643,000

Between Minimum and Target

Development Contribution – EBITDA

7,000,000

44,548,000

Maximum

Capital Expenditure Management

27,500,000

23,611,000

Maximum

National Media Group

Operating Earnings

123,000,000

114,277,000

Between Minimum and Target

Cash Flow

97,500,000

90,267,000

Between Minimum and Target

Revenue

984,730,000

934,196,000

Below Minimum

Local Media Group

Operating Earnings

117,000,000

118,302,000

Between Target and Maximum

Cash Flow

122,500,000

133,985,000

Between Target and Maximum

Revenue

386,861,000

384,745,000

Between Minimum and Target


	~~(1)~~	~~Operating cash flow for Annual Incentive target purposes is measured on a non-GAAP basis. The primary difference is that cash flow for Annual Incentives is reduced by capital expenditures.~~


	Additionally, each NEO had 20% of his Annual Incentive tied to specific individual strategic performance objectives in the general categories of strategy development and execution, operating initiatives, corporate development and people development and succession planning.

	The Annual Incentive payout for the NEOs ranges from 50% of target if the minimum levels of performance are achieved, up to 250% of target for achieving or exceeding the maximum performance level. The payouts are linear between minimum and target and between target and maximum.

Table of Contents

The above award amounts include the results of the established strategic performance objectives for each NEO, which ranged from 117% to 241% of target.


2.	~~For fiscal 2014, based on financial and operational results, the Committee approved the Annual Incentive awards for our NEOs shown in the following table:~~

Target Award

Actual Award

NEO

($)

% of Salary

($)

% of Target

Stephen M. Lacy

975,000

100

979,081

100

Joseph H. Ceryanec

392,000

70

447,549

114

Thomas H. Harty

580,000

80

471,235

81

Paul A. Karpowicz

528,750

75

665,935

126

John S. Zieser

451,500

70

555,571

123


	~~The above award amounts include the results of the established strategic performance objectives for each NEO which ranged from 138% to 188% of target.~~


	2.	Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Committee strives to link executive compensation to performance by basing a substantial portion of compensation on long-term incentive awards. The Committee has approved awards under the ~~2004~~Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan ~~in the form of stock options, time-based and performance-based restricted stock and RSUs and a multi-year performance-based cash plan.~~

		The Committee determines the appropriate balance between cash and equity compensation each year. In making that assessment, the Committee considers factors such as the relative merits of cash and each form of equity award as a device for retaining and incentivizing NEOs and the practices, as reported by the Committee’s compensation consultant, of similar companies (including peers).

		~~In fiscal 2014, NEOs received their long-term incentive awards~~(the “2014 Plan”) in the form of stock options, time-based restricted stock and time-based RSUs and a multi-year performance-based cash ~~under a long-term incentive plan (LTIP).~~ plan.

The Committee determines the appropriate balance between cash and equity compensation each year. In making that assessment, the Committee considers factors such as the relative merits of cash and each form of equity award as a device for retaining and incentivizing NEOs and the practices, as reported by the Committee’s compensation consultant, of similar companies (including peers).

In Fiscal 2016, NEOs received their long-term incentive awards in the form of stock options, time-based RSUs, and Cash LTIP.

A.
	A.	Stock Options. Stock options vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and have a ten-year term. All options are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of ~~our~~Company common stock on the date of grant. Option repricing is expressly prohibited by the terms of the ~~2004~~2014 Plan.

B.
	B.	Restricted ~~Stock. Restrictions against the sale or other transfer on restricted stock~~Stock Units. RSU awards ~~generally lapse~~vest on either the third or fifth anniversary (depending on the grant) of the grant date as determined by the Committee. ~~Recipients~~Participants receive ~~dividends and may vote restricted shares.~~cash dividend equivalents. Time-based ~~restricted stock is~~RSUs normally are granted in August and requires three years of continuous employment in order for the ~~restrictions~~award to ~~lapse.~~ vest.

For more details on stock options and restricted stock unit awards, see “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” on page 22 of this Proxy Statement.

C.
		~~For more details on stock options and restricted stock awards, see “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” on page 22 of this Proxy Statement.~~

	C.	Cash LTIP. A three-year performance-based Cash LTIP is established by the Committee to further align the compensation structure for our NEOs with the goals and strategies of the organization. ~~Each~~ Cash LTIP awards are granted annually and each three-year performance period runs concurrently and requires a certain level of Company performance and continued employment in order for the award to vest.

Payouts under the Cash LTIP are linear between each performance segment shown below.

For the Fiscal 2014-2016 Cash LTIP, awards were earned based on achieving cumulative cash flow results over the three- year performance period. The three-year cumulative cash flow result was $519,805,000 which is 108% of the target level performance. The following table includes the performance ranges and payouts for the NEOs based on actual results, as approved by the Committee:

FY2014-2016	Minimum	Target	150% of Target	Maximum	Actual Award
Cumulative Cash Flow(1)	$465,000,000	$515,000,000	$545,000,000	$565,000,000	$519,805,000
Payout %	50%	100%	150%	200%	108%
Stephen M. Lacy	$550,000	$1,100,000	$1,650,000	$2,200,000	$1,188,092
Joseph H. Ceryanec	$150,000	$300,000	$450,000	$600,000	$324,025
Thomas H. Harty	$200,000	$400,000	$600,000	$800,000	$432,033
Paul A. Karpowicz	$175,000	$350,000	$525,000	$700,000	$378,029
John S. Zieser	$162,500	$325,000	$487,500	$650,000	$351,027

(1) Cumulative cash flow on a non-GAAP basis. The primary difference is that cash flow for Cash LTIP is reduced by capital expenditures.

For the Fiscal 2015-2017 Cash LTIP, the Committee established a three-year cumulative cash flow performance objective to continue to focus the NEOs on cash generation for core and strategic business requirements.

Table of Contents

The table below outlines the Cash LTIP ranges of performance and the amounts NEOs may earn:

FY2015-2017	Minimum	Target	150% of Target	Maximum
Cumulative Cash Flow(1)	$481,500,000	$535,000,000	$565,000,000	$588,500,000
Payout %	50%	100%	150%	200%
Stephen M. Lacy	$550,000	$1,100,000	$1,650,000	$2,200,000
Joseph H. Ceryanec	$150,000	$300,000	$450,000	$600,000
Thomas H. Harty	$200,000	$400,000	$600,000	$800,000
Paul A. Karpowicz	$175,000	$350,000	$525,000	$700,000
John S. Zieser	$162,500	$325,000	$487,500	$650,000

(1) Cumulative cash flow on a non-GAAP basis. The primary difference is that cash flow for Cash LTIP is reduced by capital expenditures.

If the minimum level of cumulative cash flow performance is not achieved, the awards will be canceled.

On an annual basis the Committee establishes the three-year cumulative cash flow performance target based on Meredith’s most current three-year planning process. During this planning process, Meredith estimates its upcoming three-year cumulative cash flow based on its current assessment of future industry and company specific factors. The cash flow performance objective was lower for the Fiscal 2016 Cash LTIP than the Fiscal 2015 Cash LTIP based on these assumptions.

For the Fiscal 2016-2018 Cash LTIP, the Committee again established a three-year cumulative cash flow performance objective to continue to focus the NEOs on cash generation for core and strategic business requirements.

The table below outlines the Cash LTIP ranges of performance and the amounts NEOs may earn:

FY2016-2018	Minimum	Target	150% of Target	Maximum
Cumulative Cash Flow(1)	$463,500,000	$515,000,000	$540,800,000	$566,500,000
Payout %	50%	100%	150%	200%
Stephen M. Lacy	$550,000	$1,100,000	$1,650,000	$2,200,000
Joseph H. Ceryanec	$150,000	$300,000	$450,000	$600,000
Thomas H. Harty	$200,000	$400,000	$600,000	$800,000
Paul A. Karpowicz	$200,000	$400,000	$600,000	$800,000
John S. Zieser	$162,500	$325,000	$487,500	$650,000

(1) Cumulative cash flow on a non-GAAP basis. The primary difference is that cash flow for Cash LTIP is reduced by capital expenditures.

If the minimum level of cumulative cash flow performance is not achieved, the awards will be canceled.

The Committee believes that its current program for NEO compensation, in the form of cash versus equity, provides significant alignment with shareholders while also permitting the Committee to incent the NEOs to pursue specific short- term and long-term performance goals. In general, long-term incentive compensation ranges from 40% to 60% of the NEOs’ total target compensation, excluding retirement and other compensation.


3.	For the Fiscal 2012 - 2014 Cash LTIP, awards were earned based on achieving cumulative cash flow results over the three-year performance period. The three-year cumulative cash flow result was $493,005,000, which is 93% of the target level performance. The following table includes the performance ranges and payouts for the NEOs based on actual results, as approved by the Committee:

FY2012-2014

Minimum

Target

Maximum

Actual Award

Cumulative Cash Flow(1)

$475,000,000

$530,000,000

$585,000,000

$493,005,000

Payout %

50%

100%

150%

66.4%

Stephen M. Lacy

$375,000

$750,000

$1,125,000

$497,761

Joseph H. Ceryanec

$110,000

$220,000

$330,000

$146,010

Thomas H. Harty

$125,000

$250,000

$375,000

$165,920

Paul A. Karpowicz

$125,000

$250,000

$375,000

$165,920

John S. Zieser

$120,000

$240,000

$360,000

$159,284


	~~(1)~~	~~Cumulative cash flow on a non-GAAP basis. The primary difference is that cash flow for Cash LTIP is reduced by capital expenditures.~~


	For the Fiscal 2013 - 2015 Cash LTIP, the Committee established a three-year cumulative cash flow performance objective. The Committee increased the maximum payout from 150% to 200% of target to provide motivational opportunity for greater performance and rewards commensurate with increased performance as shown below:

FY2013-2015

Minimum

Target

Maximum

Cumulative Cash Flow(1)

$450,000,000

$500,000,000

$550,000,000

Payout %

50%

100%

200%

Stephen M. Lacy

$375,000

$750,000

$1,500,000

Joseph H. Ceryanec

$110,000

$220,000

$440,000

Thomas H. Harty

$125,000

$250,000

$500,000

Paul A. Karpowicz

$125,000

$250,000

$500,000

John S. Zieser

$120,000

$240,000

$480,000


	~~(1)~~	~~Cumulative cash flow on a non-GAAP basis. The primary difference is that cash flow for Cash LTIP is reduced by capital expenditures.~~


	~~If the minimum level of cumulative cash flow performance is not achieved, the awards will be canceled.~~

	On an annual basis the Committee establishes the three-year cumulative cash flow performance target based on Meredith’s most current three-year planning process. During this planning process, Meredith estimates its upcoming three-year accumulated cash flow based on its then current assessment of future industry and company-specific factors. The cash flow performance objective was lower for the Fiscal 2013 Cash LTIP than for the Fiscal 2012 Cash LTIP based on these assessments along with an estimated reduction in tax savings related to the amortization of previous years’ broadcast acquisitions becoming fully amortized for tax purposes.

	For the Fiscal 2014 - 2016 Cash LTIP, the Committee again established a three-year cumulative cash flow performance objective to continue to focus the NEOs on cash generation for core and strategic business requirements. For the NEOs, the Committee increased the financial weighting on the three-year performance goal of our Cash LTIP and offset the increase with a reduction in the weighting of stock option awards. This action was taken to increase performance objectives against a pre-defined metric and to reduce our annual share usage.

	~~The table below outlines the Cash LTIP ranges of performance and the amount the NEOs are eligible to earn:~~

FY2014-2016

Minimum

Target

Maximum

Cumulative Cash Flow(1)

$465,000,000

$515,000,000

$565,000,000

Payout %

50%

100%

200%

Stephen M. Lacy

$550,000

$1,100,000

$2,200,000

Joseph H. Ceryanec

$150,000

$300,000

$600,000

Thomas H. Harty

$200,000

$400,000

$800,000

Paul A. Karpowicz

$175,000

$350,000

$700,000

John S. Zieser

$162,500

$325,000

$650,000


	~~(1)~~	~~Cumulative cash flow on a non-GAAP basis. The primary difference is that cash flow for Cash LTIP is reduced by capital expenditures.~~

~~Table of Contents~~


		~~If the minimum level of cumulative cash flow performance is not achieved, the awards will be canceled.~~

		The Committee believes that its current program for NEO compensation, in the form of cash versus equity, provides significant alignment with shareholders while also permitting the Committee to incentivize the NEOs to pursue specific short-term and long-term performance goals. In general, long-term incentive compensation ranges from 40% to 60% of the NEOs’ total target compensation, excluding retirement and other compensation.

3.	Executive Stock Ownership Program. To further align executives’ interests with shareholders, NEOs are encouraged to own Meredith stock. AnThe Committee has established an Executive Stock Ownership Program ~~has been established by the Committee~~ to assist executives in achieving their ownership targets. ~~Target~~The Committee has established target levels for individual stock holdings ~~are established by the Committee~~ for the participants in the program. Eligible shares for ~~the NEOs~~an NEO’s required ownership target include shares ~~acquired through~~held in the ESPP, ~~401(k)~~401 (k) Plan, ~~unrestricted and~~vested restricted stock and RSUs, shares retained upon option exercises and shares acquired through open market share purchases. ~~The~~ NEOs must attain the ownership requirements within a five-year period. Each participant is awarded ~~restricted stock~~RSUs equal to 20% of ~~his~~ personal acquisitions of Meredith stock through share purchases, shares retained upon option exercises or lapsing of restrictions on restricted stock or RSUs that have vested since the last day of the prior calendar year up to the established target. The incremental stock acquisitions must be held for a period of five years in order for the restrictions to ~~lapse.~~lapse or award to vest. The award shares/units are capped at 20% of the NEO’s Target Ownership level. The Committee believes this program provides further incentives to the participants to focus on long-term Company performance and shareholder value.

Table of Contents

The following table reflects each NEO’s ownership requirements and whether those stock ownership requirements have been attained:

~~The following table reflects each NEO’s ownership requirements and attainment toward those requirements within the five-year time frame:~~


Participant	Target Ownership (Shares)	Status
Stephen M. Lacy	120,000	Met
Joseph H. Ceryanec	50,000	Met
Thomas H. Harty	50,000	Met
Paul A. Karpowicz	50,000	Met
John S. Zieser	50,000	Met

~~50,000~~

~~Met~~

On January ~~31, 2014~~30, 2016 the following participants received matching restricted stock unit awards pursuant to the Executive Stock Ownership Program:

Participant

Eligible Shares

Restricted Stock Granted

Stephen M. Lacy

2,215

443

Joseph H. Ceryanec

15,537

3,107

Thomas H. Harty

5,742

1,148

Paul A. Karpowicz*

6,522

—

John S. Zieser*

9,270

—

*Mr. Karpowicz and Mr. Zieser previously received all restricted stock grants available under the Program.

Participant	Eligible Shares	RSUs Granted
Stephen M. Lacy	20,392	4,078
Joseph H. Ceryanec*	9,467	—
Thomas H. Harty**	27,576	3,449
Paul A. Karpowicz*	7,536	—
John S. Zieser*	7,395	—

* Messrs. Ceryanec, Karpowicz, and Zieser previously received all restricted stock grants available under the program.

** Mr. Harty’s grant was capped as this award brought him to the maximum number of RSUs available under the program.

	4.
	4.	Perquisites. The NEOs receive various perquisites provided by or paid for by the Company. These perquisites include financial planning services, memberships in social and professional clubs, matching contributions to 401(k) plans, car allowances and premiums for life and disability insurance.

The Company provides perquisites to attract and retain executives in a competitive market. These perquisites also allow our NEOs to be effective in conducting day-to-day business by creating and maintaining important business relationships.

The Committee reviews the perquisites provided to the NEOs on a regular basis to ensure that they continue to be appropriate in light of the Committee’s overall goal of designing compensation programs for NEOs that align with the interests of our shareholders.

	5.
		The Company provides perquisites to attract and retain executives in a competitive market. These perquisites also allow our NEOs to be effective in conducting day-to-day business by creating and maintaining important business relationships.

		The Committee reviews the perquisites provided to the NEOs on a regular basis to ensure that they continue to be appropriate in light of the Committee’s overall goal of designing compensation programs for NEOs that maximize the interests of our shareholders.

	5.	Deferred Compensation. The Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”) allows certain employees, including the NEOs, to defer receipt of salary and/or incentive payments. The DCP has investment alternatives that are comparable to the funds offered in the Company’s 401(k) plan. Additionally, participants can elect to defer their compensation as ~~stock equivalent units (SEUs).~~SEUs. SEUs are not voted in shareholder meetings and dividends are reinvested. The Company does not credit DCP matching contributions to the individual accounts of our NEOs.

Participants may defer up to 100% of base salary over $265,000 and 90% of incentive payments, provided total annual compensation exceeds $265,000 after deferrals. The deferred amounts are credited to accounts established for participants. Each participant is fully vested in the portions attributed to his or her deferral of salary and bonus. Participants have an unsecured contractual commitment for the Company to pay the amounts due under the DCP.

At the time a participant makes a deferral election, he or she must elect when the amount attributable to such deferral election is to be distributed and whether such amount is to be paid in a lump sum or annual installments. Participants can schedule distributions to be paid while employed or upon separation from service, subject to any required waiting period.

We also provide the opportunity to defer as SEUs, awards of restricted stock and awards of RSUs when they are earned and vested, subject to IRS regulations.

This benefit is provided because the Company wishes to permit employees to defer their obligation to pay taxes on certain elements of compensation they are entitled to receive. The DCP permits them to do this while also receiving investment gains/losses on deferred amounts. The provision of this benefit is important as a retention and recruitment tool because many, if not all, of the companies with which the Company competes for executive talent provide a similar plan to their senior employees.

Table of Contents


		Participants may defer up to 100% of base salary over $260,000 and 90% of incentive payments, provided total annual compensation exceeds $260,000 after deferrals. The deferred amounts are credited to accounts established for participants. Each participant is fully vested in the portions attributed to his or her deferral of salary and bonus. Participants have an unsecured contractual commitment for the Company to pay the amounts due under the DCP.

		At the time a participant makes a deferral election, he or she must elect when the amount attributable to such deferral election is to be distributed and whether such amount is to be paid in a lump sum or annual installments. Participants can schedule distributions to be paid while employed or upon separation from service, subject to any required waiting period.

		~~We also provide the opportunity to defer as SEUs, awards of restricted stock and awards of RSUs when they are earned and vested, subject to Section 409A regulations.~~

		This benefit is provided because we wish to permit employees to defer their obligation to pay taxes on certain elements of compensation they are entitled to receive. The DCP permits them to do this while also receiving investment gains/ losses on deferred amounts. The provision of this benefit is important as a retention and recruitment tool because many, if not all, of the companies with which we compete for executive talent provide a similar plan to their senior employees.

Compensation Consultant

~~The Compensation Committee has authority under~~

Under its Charter, tothe Committee may engage the services of outside advisors, experts and others to assist the Committee. In accordance with this authority, the Committee has retained an independent executive compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson, to advise the Committee on all matters related to executive compensation. The consultant attended three Committee meetings in fiscal 2014. From time to time, the compensation consultant may, upon the specific request of the Chair of the Compensation Committee, issue engagement letters for particular projects or assignments. Towers Watson’s services to the Committee will be limited to those matters on which Towers Watson has specifically been engaged and may include executive compensation trends, equity grant philosophies and practices, tally sheet design and specific position competitive data.

2016. Willis Towers Watson reports directly to the ~~Compensation~~ Committee for executive compensation services and the ~~Compensation~~ Committee ~~has the authority to~~may terminate Willis Towers Watson with respect to such services. Services performed by Willis Towers Watson for executive compensation consulting were under the direction and approval of the ~~Compensation~~ Committee. In fiscal ~~2014,~~2016, Willis Towers Watson was paid ~~$94,527~~$54,271 for executive compensation consulting services and ~~$200,255~~$211,315 for actuarial services, for a total of ~~$294,782.~~$265,586.

The ~~Compensation~~ Committee has assessed Willis Towers Watson’s independence using the SEC regulations issued under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. In assessing Willis Towers Watson’s independence, the Committee took into account the following factors:

Policies and procedures Willis Towers Watson has in place to prevent conflicts of interest; Any business or personal relationships between Willis Towers Watson or the members of Willis Towers Watson performing consulting services for the Committee and members of the Committee; Any business or personal relationships between Willis Towers Watson or members of Willis Towers Watson performing consulting services for the Committee and any executive officer; Any company stock owned by members of Willis Towers Watson performing consulting services for the Committee; Other services provided by Willis Towers Watson to Meredith; and Fees paid to Willis Towers Watson as a percent of the firm’s revenue.
	•	~~Policies and procedures Towers Watson has in place to prevent conflicts of interest;~~
	•	~~Any business or personal relationships between Towers Watson or the members of Towers Watson performing consulting services for the Committee and members of the Compensation Committee;~~
	•	~~Any business or personal relationships between Towers Watson or members of Towers Watson performing consulting services for the Committee and any executive officer;~~
	•	~~Any company stock owned by members of Towers Watson performing consulting services for the Compensation Committee,~~
	•	~~Other services provided by Towers Watson to Meredith; and~~
	•	~~Fees paid to Towers Watson as a percent of the firm’s revenue.~~

Based on the above factors, the ~~Compensation~~ Committee believes the engagement of Willis Towers Watson did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Treatment of Special Items

In determining performance goals and evaluating performance results, the Committee may use its discretion and judgment to ensure that management’s rewards for business performance are commensurate with their contributions to that performance while still holding management accountable for the overall results of the business to the extent permitted by governing law. The Committee believes that the metrics for incentive compensation plans should be specific and objective, yet recognizes that interpretation of the application of pre-established metrics to results may be necessary from time to time for certain special items, such as changes in applicable accounting rules pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”),

~~Table of Contents~~

changes in tax laws or applicable tax rates, acquisitions and divestitures and special investments or expenditures in the Company’s operations. The Committee did not exercise ~~its~~such discretion in adjusting management’s awards for fiscal ~~2014.~~2016.

Tax Deductibility of Compensation –- Section 162(m) Compliance

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”), places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that the Company may deduct in any one year with respect to each of its NEOs. ~~The Company generally intends to comply with the requirements for full deductibility.~~ There is an exception to the $1 million limitation for performance-based compensation meeting certain requirements. Annual and long-term non-equity incentive compensation, performance-based restricted ~~stock /~~ stock/units and stock option awards generally are performance-based compensation meeting those requirements and, as such, are ~~fully~~intended to be deductible. ToHowever, to maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Committee reserves the right to provide ~~for~~ compensation to the NEOs that may not be deductible.

Practices Regarding the Grant of Options

The Committee has generally followed a practice of making option grants to its executive officers at its regular quarterly meeting in August. The August meeting date historically has occurred within four weeks ofafter the issuance of the release reporting earnings for the previous fiscal year. The Committee believes it is appropriate that annual awards be made at a time when material information regarding performance for the preceding year has been disclosed. Grants may be made at other times during the year in connection

Table of Contents

with promotions or as a tool to attract talent. We do not have any program, plan or practice to time annual option grants to our executives, directors or other employees in coordination with the release of material non-public information.

All option awards made to our non-employee directors, NEOs ~~or any~~and other ~~employee~~employees in fiscal ~~2014~~2016 were made in accordance with the ~~2004~~2014 Plan. All options are granted with an exercise price equal to at least the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Fair market value has been defined by the ~~Compensation~~ Committee to be the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant. ~~We do not have any program, plan or practice of awarding options with an exercise price other than the closing market price on the date of grant.~~

Post-Termination Compensation

	1.
	1.	Severance Agreements. We have entered into a Severance Agreement with each of the NEOs. These agreements provide for payments and other benefits if the officer’s employment terminates for a qualifying event or circumstance, such as being terminated “Without Cause” or leaving employment for “Good Reason,” as these terms are defined in the Severance Agreement. Additional information regarding the Severance Agreement, including a definition of key terms and quantification of benefits that would have been received by our NEOs had termination occurred on June 30, ~~2014~~2016, is found under the heading, “Payment Obligations upon Termination Due to Change in Control” on page 3332 of this Proxy Statement.

The Committee believes that these Severance Agreements are an important part of overall compensation for our NEOs and that these agreements help secure the continued employment and dedication of our NEOs, notwithstanding any concern they might have regarding their own continued employment prior to or following a Change in Control. The Committee also believes that these agreements are important as a recruitment and retention device, given the competitive market for executive talent.

Employment Agreements. We have entered into Employee Agreements with all of the NEOs. Refer to “Potential Payments upon Termination” for further details.


3.		The Committee believes that these Severance Agreements are an important part of overall compensation for our NEOs and that these agreements help secure the continued employment and dedication of our NEOs, notwithstanding any concern they might have regarding their own continued employment prior to or following a Change in Control. The Committee also believes that these agreements are important as a recruitment and retention device, given the competitive market for executive talent.

	2.	Employees’ Retirement Income Plan, Replacement Benefit Plan and Supplemental Benefit Plan. We maintain separate qualified defined benefit plans for ~~our~~ union and non-union employees, as well as two nonqualified supplemental pension plans covering certain non-union employees. The NEOs are covered under the non-union plan ~~(Retirement~~(Employees’ Retirement Income Plan), the Replacement Benefit Plan and the Supplemental Benefit Plan. The amount of annual earnings that may be considered in calculating benefits under the Employees’ Retirement Income Plan is limited by law. For ~~2014,~~2016, the annual limitation is ~~$260,000.~~$265,000. The Replacement Benefit Plan is an unfunded plan that provides an amount substantially equal to the difference between the amount that would have been payable under the Employees’ Retirement Income Plan in the absence of legislation limiting pension benefits and earnings that may be considered in calculating pension benefits and the amount actually payable under the Employees’ Retirement Income Plan.

		The Supplemental Plan is an unfunded nonqualified plan. The purpose of the Supplemental Plan is to provide for NEOs the excess, if any, of the benefits they would have become entitled to under our prior defined benefit plan if it had continued in effect after August 31, 1989.

~~Table of Contents~~


		The Committee believes that the Retirement Income Plan, Replacement Plan and Supplemental Plan serve a critically important role in the retention of our senior executives, as benefits thereunder increase each year that these executives remain with the Company. The plans thereby encourage our most senior executives to continue their work on behalf of the Company and our shareholders.

The Supplemental Benefit Plan is an unfunded nonqualified plan. The purpose of the Supplemental Benefit Plan is to provide for NEOs the excess, if any, of the benefits they would have become entitled to under our prior defined benefit plan if it had continued in effect after August 31, 1989.

The Committee believes that the Employees’ Retirement Income Plan, Replacement Benefit Plan, and Supplemental Benefit Plan serve a critically important role in the retention of senior executives, as benefits thereunder increase each year that these executives remain with the Company. The plans thereby encourage our most senior executives to continue their work on behalf of the Company and our shareholders.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

We, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Meredith Corporation, have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above with management of the Company and, based upon such review and discussion, have recommended to the Board of Directors the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement and, through incorporation by reference from this Proxy Statement, in the Company’s Annual Report on for the year ended June 30, ~~2014.~~2016.

	COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
	~~COMPENSATION COMMITTEE~~ Frederick B. Henry, ~~Chair~~ Chairman
	D. Mell Meredith Frazier
	Philip A. Marineau
	Elizabeth E. Tallett

Table of Contents

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

During fiscal ~~year 2014~~2016, Messrs. Lacy, Ceryanec, Harty, Karpowicz and Zieser were employed pursuant to agreements with the Company. A more complete description of those agreements begins on page 2726 of this Proxy Statement. The salary for each of the NEOs is set according to the terms of such employment agreement or at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Each NEO is entitled to participate in all employee benefit plans maintained by the Company, including the ~~2004~~2014 Plan. In addition, customary perquisites are provided to each of the NEOs.

Many elements affect the change in the pension value from year to year, including age, years of service, pay increase, annuity conversion rate change, and/or discount rate change. Specifically, the change in the assumed annuity conversion rate may produce unexpected changes from year to year.

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal ~~Year 2014~~2016

Name and Principal
Position

Year

Salary ($)

Bonus ($)

Stock Awards
($)(1)

Option Awards
($)(2)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)

Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)(4)

All Other
Compensation
($)(5)

Total ($)

Stephen M. Lacy,

2014

975,000

—

978,681

737,452

1,476,842

3,094,284

38,759

7,301,018

Chairman and CEO

2013

975,000

—

1,127,011

968,217

2,070,482

—

42,081

5,182,791

2012

950,000

—

834,487

567,042

896,672

2,602,433

36,264

5,886,898

Joseph H. Ceryanec,

2014

560,000

—

561,538

204,217

593,559

386,678

33,637

2,339,629

Chief Financial Officer

2013

560,000

—

428,067

267,094

758,655

52,009

34,565

2,100,390

2012

525,000

—

222,989

156,271

378,023

351,047

28,025

1,661,356

Thomas H. Harty,

2014

725,000

—

531,755

260,944

637,155

679,214

34,857

2,868,925

President- National Media Group

2013

700,000

—

679,848

300,481

774,490

—

36,334

2,491,153

2012

675,000

—

345,779

178,596

327,923

571,631

40,683

2,139,612

~~Table of Contents~~

Name and Principal
Position

Year

Salary ($)

Bonus ($)

Stock Awards
($)(1)

Option Awards
($)(2)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)

Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)(4)

All Other
Compensation
($)(5)

Total ($)

Paul A. Karpowicz,

2014

705,000

—

335,440

226,908

831,855

1,114,500

37,799

3,251,502

President- Local Media Group

2013

705,000

—

404,645

293,804

1,208,113

218,418

23,767

2,853,747

2012

680,000

—

377,364

174,131

860,182

802,573

35,243

2,929,493

John S. Zieser, Chief

2014

645,000

—

431,280

204,217

714,855

1,147,201

30,088

3,172,641

Development Officer, General Counsel and Secretary

2013

645,000

—

296,225

287,126

900,011

—

32,261

2,160,623

2012

625,000

—

327,175

169,666

500,796

1,184,770

30,353

2,837,760

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)(1)	Option Awards ($)(2)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(4)	All Other Compensation ($)(5)	Total ($)
Stephen M. Lacy,	2016	1,000,000		1,111,660	697,909	3,311,624	2,337,935	48,410	8,507,538
Chairman and CEO	2015	993,270		982,917	744,094	2,674,527	1,743,530	42,653	7,180,991
	2014	975,000		978,681	737,452	1,476,842	3,094,284	38,759	7,301,018
Joseph H. Ceryanec, Chief Financial Officer	2016	590,000		462,759	193,267	1,136,677	666,889	40,436	3,090,028
	2015	581,923		386,678	206,057	953,624	247,694	32,457	2,408,433
	2014	560,000		561,538	204,217	593,559	386,678	33,637	2,339,629
Thomas H. Harty, President- National	2016	760,000		519,339	246,952	1,355,406	1,130,857	31,743	4,044,297
Media Group	2015	750,577		461,580	263,295	1,043,574	445,422	34,007	2,998,455
	2014	725,000		531,755	260,944	637,155	679,214	34,857	2,868,925
Paul A. Karpowicz,	2016	725,000		597,012	246,952	1,512,512	1,111,560	36,529	4,229,565
President- Local Media Group	2015	719,616		333,537	228,952	1,051,694	818,583	42,600	3,194,982
	2014	705,000		335,440	226,908	831,855	1,114,500	37,799	3,251,502
John S. Zieser, Chief	2016	665,000		462,759	193,267	1,195,401	1,324,551	46,697	3,887,675
Development Officer, General Counsel and	2015	659,616		310,692	206,057	1,026,128	549,186	30,138	2,781,817
Secretary	2014	645,000		431,280	204,217	714,855	1,147,201	30,088	3,172,641

(1)

Stock awards are reported at the aggregate grant date fair value in accordance with ~~FASB ASC~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic ~~718.~~718,Compensation -Stock Compensation (“Topic 718”). Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 11 to the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2014.~~

2016 (“From 10-K”).

~~(2)~~

(2)

Option awards in this column are reported at the aggregate grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 11 to the Company’s audited financial statements included in the ~~Company’s Annual Report on for the year ended June 30, 2014.~~

From 10-K.

~~(3)~~

(3)

Included in this column for each NEO ~~for 2014~~ are the awards earned ~~during the~~for each three-year performance period of the ~~Fiscal 2012-2014~~ Cash LTIP. The earned awards ~~vested~~vest on ~~June 30, 2014,~~the last day of the three-year performance period and ~~were~~are paid out after the Compensation Committee ~~met and certified~~certifies the results of the three-year performance period. The awards earned ~~for 2014~~under the Fiscal 2014-2016 Cash LTIP are as follows: Lacy-$1,188,092, Ceryanec-$324,025, Harty-$432,033, Karpowicz-$378,029 and Zieser-$351,027. The awards earned under the Fiscal 2013-2015 Cash LTIP are as follows: Lacy-$889,163, Ceryanec-$260,821, Harty-$296,388, Karpowicz-$296,388 and Zieser-$284,532. The awards earned under the Fiscal 2012-2014 Cash LTIP are as follows: Lacy-$497,761, Ceryanec-$146,010, Harty-$165,920, Karpowicz-$165,920 and Zieser-$159,284.

~~(4)~~

(4)

The amounts for ~~2014~~2016 shown in this column represent the change in pension value measured from June 30, ~~2013~~2015 to June 30, ~~2014.~~2016. The following assumptions were used to calculate the prior year’s present values: Measurement date – June 30, ~~2013;~~2015; discount rate – ~~Qualified Plan, 3.80%; Replacement~~Employees’ Retirement Income Plan, 3.70%; Replacement Benefit Plan, 3.40%; Supplemental Benefit Plan, ~~4.70%~~4.10%; interest crediting rate – ~~Qualified Plan, 3.05%; Replacement~~Employees’ Retirement Income Plan, 2.95%; Replacement Benefit Plan, 2.65%; Supplemental Benefit Plan, ~~3.95%~~3.35%; annuity conversion rate – ~~4.70%~~4.60% (unless specified by employment agreement); annuity conversion mortality – ~~2013~~2015 IRS Prescribed 417(e)(3) Unisex; retirement age – 65; compensation and benefit limits – ~~2013~~2015 levels; salary increases – none; and ~~pre-retirement~~pre- retirement decrements – none. The ~~amounts~~increases in pension value shown in the ~~Summary Compensation Table increased from last year~~table are due to ~~the~~ decreases in the ~~annuity conversion~~discount rate, ~~assumption,~~ continued service accruals, final average earnings increases and ~~significant bonus payments. This is in contrast~~reduced discounting (due to ~~last year’s results, which were zero for most executives due to the increase in the annuity conversion assumption used to determine lump sums.~~

aging).

~~(5)~~

Table of Contents

(5)

Amounts in this column for fiscal ~~2014~~2016 include for all NEOs: Annual auto allowance less mileage reimbursed as business expense, club membership dues, professional fees, reimbursement for tax preparation and financial planning, life insurance premiums and Company contributions to the 401(k) Plan in the amount of ~~$10,400~~$10,600 for each NEO.

Awards

The Grants of Plan-Based Awards table provides additional detail about the equity and non-equity awards shown in the Summary Compensation Table. The Compensation Committee granted awards during fiscal ~~2014~~2016 as shown in the table below to each of the NEOs pursuant to the ~~2004~~2014 Plan. ~~Restricted stock was~~RSUs were awarded by the Compensation Committee on August ~~13, 2013. The restricted stock~~11, 2015. Each RSU award will vest in its entirety on the third anniversary of the grant date. The Committee also granted options on August ~~13, 2013~~11, 2015 to each ~~of our NEOs.~~NEO. Each option granted will become exercisable in its entirety on the third anniversary of the grant date. The January ~~31, 2014~~30, 2016 awards of ~~restricted stock~~RSUs were made pursuant to the 2014 Plan, subject to the Executive Stock Ownership Program which is described in detail beginning on page 1817 of this Proxy Statement. For additional information on equity awards, please see the ~~“Equity~~“Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

At the beginning of fiscal ~~2014,~~2016, the Compensation Committee established potential non-equity incentive awards for each of the NEOs under the ~~2004~~2014 Plan. The amount of the incentive for each NEO was tied to specific financial and individual performance targets established by the Committee. The incentives earned by the NEOs are reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table above.

~~Table of Contents~~

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal ~~Year 2014~~2016


		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)								Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
Name	Grant Date	Minimum ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(2)(3)	All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options(4)	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh.)(5)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(6)	Grant Date	Minimum ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(2)(3)(4)	All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options(5)	Exercise Price of Option Awards ($/Sh.)(6)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(7)
Lacy	8/13/2013	487,500	975,000	2,437,500					8/11/2015	575,000	1,150,000	2,875,000
	8/13/2013	550,000	1,100,000	2,200,000					8/11/2015	550,000	1,100,000	2,200,000
	8/13/2013					65,000	47.92	737,452	8/11/2015					65,000	44.72	697,909
	8/13/2013				20,000			958,400	8/11/2015				21,000			939,120
	1/31/2014				443			20,281	1/30/2016				4,078			172,540
Ceryanec	8/13/2013	196,000	392,000	980,000					8/11/2015	206,500	413,000	1,032,500
	8/13/2013	150,000	300,000	600,000					8/11/2015	150,000	300,000	600,000
	8/13/2013					18,000	47.92	204,217	8/11/2015					18,000	44.72	193,267
	8/13/2013				6,250			299,500	8/11/2015				6,800			304,096
	8/13/2013				2,500			119,800	1/30/2016				3,750			158,663
	1/31/2014				3,107			142,238
Harty	8/13/2013	290,000	580,000	1,450,000					8/11/2015	323,000	646,000	1,615,000
	8/13/2013	200,000	400,000	800,000
	8/13/2013					23,000	47.92	260,944	8/11/2015	200,000	400,000	800,000
	8/13/2013				2,000			95,840	8/11/2015					23,000	44.72	246,952
	8/13/2013				8,000			383,360	8/11/2015				8,350			373,412
	1/31/2014				1,148			52,555	1/30/2016				3,449			145,927
Karpowicz	8/13/2013	264,375	528,750	1,321,875					8/11/2015	308,125	616,250	1,540,625
	8/13/2013	175,000	350,000	700,000					8/11/2015	200,000	400,000	800,000
	8/13/2013					20,000	47.92	226,908	8/11/2015					23,000	44.72	246,952
	8/13/2013				7,000			335,440	8/11/2015				8,350			373,412
									8/11/2015				5,000			223,600
Zieser	8/13/2013	225,750	451,500	1,128,750					8/11/2015	232,750	465,500	1,163,750
	8/13/2013	162,500	325,000	650,000					8/11/2015	162,500	325,000	650,000
	8/13/2013					18,000	47.92	204,217	8/11/2015					18,000	44.72	193,267
	8/13/2013				6,500			311,480	8/11/2015				6,800			304,096
	8/13/2013				2,500			119,800	1/30/2016				3,750			158,663

(1)

The minimum, target and maximum annual non-equity incentive awards that could be earned during the year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2016 are shown on the first line next to each NEO’s name. The actual amounts of the awards were determined by the Compensation Committee based on the level achieved with respect to each NEO’s individual incentive plan and are reported in the Summary Compensation Table, above. Individual incentive plans may include EPS, operating cash flow, group operating cash flow or other measurements. The minimum, target and maximum ~~2014~~2016-2018 Cash LTIP awards that could be earned by each NEO, if certain performance levels are achieved over a three-year performance period (July 1, ~~2013~~2015 to June 30, ~~2016)~~2018),

Table of Contents

are listed on the second line. The awards do not vest until June 30, ~~2016~~2018 and are subject to continued employment. If minimum performance levels are not achieved the awards will be canceled.

~~(2)~~

(2)

The August ~~13, 2013~~11, 2015 grants of ~~restricted stock~~RSUs shown in this column will vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date. ~~Dividends~~Dividend equivalents at the normal rate are paid on ~~shares of restricted stock.~~

RSUs.

~~(3)~~

(3)

The January ~~31, 2014~~30, 2016 grants of ~~restricted stock shown above~~RSUs for Messrs. Lacy, Harty and Karpowicz were awarded under the Executive Stock Ownership Plan which ~~was~~is designed to encourage increased Company stock holdings by executives. Target levels of individual stock holdings are established by the Committee for participants in the program. Each participant receives an annual award of ~~restricted stock~~RSUs equal to 20% of his or her personal acquisition of Company stock. The incremental stock holdings must be maintained for a period of five years in order for the ~~restrictions~~units to ~~lapse.~~vest. The ~~shares~~units awarded are subject to forfeiture prior to vesting which occurs on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. ~~Dividends~~Dividend equivalents at the normal rate are paid on ~~shares~~RSUs.

(4)

The January 30, 2016 grants of ~~restricted stock.~~

RSUs for Messrs. Ceryanec and Zieser were awarded for their efforts related to the Meredith-Media General, Inc. transaction.

~~(4)~~

(5)

Options listed in this column will vest ~~100%~~in full on the third anniversary of the grant date and will expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant.

~~(5)~~

(6)

The exercise price equals the NYSE closing price per share on the date of grant.

~~(6)~~

(7)

The value of restricted stock unit awards is based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The estimated value of options is calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. For a description of the assumptions used to calculate the amounts, see Note 11 ~~(Common Stock and Share-Based Compensation Plans)~~ to the Company’s ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~audited financial statements included in ~~its Annual Report on~~the Form ~~10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014.~~

10-K.

~~Table of Contents~~

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End ~~2014~~2016

The following table discloses outstanding equity awards as of June 30, ~~2014,~~2016, for each NEO.


		Option Awards				Stock Awards				Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options – Exercisable (#)(1)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options – Unexercisable (#)(1)	Option Exercise Price ($)(2)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(3)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(4)	Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options – Exercisable (#)(1)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options – Unexercisable (#)(1)	Option Exercise Price ($)(2)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(3)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(4)
Lacy	8/10/2004	90,000		49.97	8/10/2014				8/7/2007	120,000		53.90	8/7/2017
	8/9/2005	53,333		49.10	8/9/2015
	8/8/2006	106,000		46.21	8/8/2016
	8/7/2007	120,000		53.90	8/7/2017				1/28/2012					510		26,474
	1/30/2011					1,535		74,233	2/2/2013					4,161		215,998
	8/9/2011		127,000	25.58	8/9/2021	32,000	*	1,547,520	8/13/2013		65,000	47.92	8/13/2023	20,000	*	1,038,200
	1/28/2012					510		24,664	1/31/2014					443		22,996
	8/7/2012		145,000	34.85	8/7/2022	28,000	*	1,354,080	8/12/2014		65,000	45.69	8/12/2024	21,000	*	1,090,110
	2/2/2013					4,161		201,226	1/31/2015					450		23,360
	8/13/2013		65,000	47.92	8/13/2023	20,000	*	967,200	8/11/2015		65,000	44.72	8/11/2025	21,000	*	1,090,110
	1/31/2014					443		21,423	1/30/2016					4,078		211,689
Ceryanec	1/30/2010					104		5,029	1/28/2012					178		9,240
	1/30/2011					345		16,684	2/2/2013					4,587		238,111
	8/9/2011		35,000	25.58	8/9/2021	8,500	*	411,060	8/13/2013		18,000	47.92	8/13/2023	6,250	*	324,438
	1/28/2012					178		8,608	8/13/2013					2,500	*	129,775
	8/7/2012		40,000	34.85	8/7/2022	7,500	*	362,700	1/31/2014					3,107		161,284
	2/2/2013					4,587		221,827	8/12/2014		18,000	45.69	8/12/2024	6,550	*	340,011
	8/13/2013		18,000	47.92	8/13/2023	6,250	*	302,250	1/31/2015					1,679		87,157
	8/13/2013					2,500	*	120,900	8/11/2015		18,000	44.72	8/11/2025	6,800	*	352,988
	1/31/2014					3,107		150,255	1/30/2016					3,750	*	194,663
Harty	8/10/2004	4,500		49.97	8/10/2014				8/7/2007	10,000		53.90	8/7/2017
	8/9/2005	6,000		49.10	8/9/2015				8/10/2010	30,000		32.85	8/10/2020
	8/8/2006	5,000		46.21	8/8/2016				8/9/2011	40,000		25.58	8/9/2021
	8/7/2007	10,000		53.90	8/7/2017				1/28/2012					1,243		64,524
	8/10/2010	30,000		32.85	8/10/2020				8/7/2012	45,000		34.85	8/7/2022
	8/10/2010					15,000		725,400	8/7/2012					6,000		311,460
	1/30/2011					1,176		56,871	2/2/2013					1,446		75,062
	8/9/2011		40,000	25.58	8/9/2021	12,000	*	580,320	8/13/2013		23,000	47.92	8/13/2023	8,000	*	415,280
	1/28/2012					1,243		60,111	8/13/2013					2,000	*	103,820
	8/7/2012		45,000	34.85	8/7/2022	12,000	*	580,320	1/31/2014					1,148		59,593
	8/7/2012					6,000		290,160	8/12/2014		23,000	45.69	8/12/2024	8,350	*	433,449
	2/2/2013					1,446		69,929	1/31/2015					1,538		79,838
	8/13/2013		23,000	47.92	8/13/2023	8,000	*	386,880	8/11/2015		23,000	44.72	8/11/2025	8,350	*	433,449
	8/13/2013					2,000	*	96,720	1/30/2016					3,449		179,038
	1/31/2014					1,148		55,517
Karpowicz	2/14/2005	40,000		47.56	2/14/2015
	8/8/2006	30,000		46.21	8/8/2016
	8/7/2007	30,000		53.90	8/7/2017
	8/11/2009	83,000		28.60	8/11/2019
	1/30/2010					254		12,283
	8/10/2010	31,000		32.85	8/10/2020
	1/30/2011					2,173		105,086
	8/9/2011		39,000	25.58	8/9/2021	10,500	*	507,780
	1/28/2012					3,483		168,438
	8/7/2012		44,000	34.85	8/7/2022	9,000	*	435,240

Table of Contents

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Grant Date

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options –
Exercisable
(#)(1)

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options –
Unexercisable
(#)(1)

Option
Exercise
Price ($)(2)

Option
Expiration
Date

Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)(3)

Market Value of
Shares or
Units of Stock That
Have
Not Vested ($)(4)

Karpowicz (continued)

2/2/2013

2,504

121,093

8/13/2013

20,000

47.92

8/13/2023

7,000

*

338,520

Zieser

8/7/2007

20,000

53.90

8/7/2017

1/30/2011

3,305

159,830

8/9/2011

38,000

25.58

8/9/2021

9,500

*

459,420

1/28/2012

2,695

130,330

8/7/2012

43,000

34.85

8/7/2022

8,500

*

411,060

8/13/2013

18,000

47.92

8/13/2023

6,500

*

314,340

8/13/2013

2,500

*

120,900


		Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options – Exercisable (#)(1)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options – Unexercisable (#)(1)	Option Exercise Price ($)(2)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(3)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(4)
Karpowicz	8/8/2006	30,000		46.21	8/8/2016
	8/7/2007	30,000		53.90	8/7/2017
	8/11/2009	83,000		28.60	8/11/2019
	8/10/2010	31,000		32.85	8/10/2020
	8/9/2011	39,000		25.58	8/9/2021
	1/28/2012					3,483		180,803
	8/7/2012	44,000		34.85	8/7/2022
	2/2/2013					2,504		129,983
	8/13/2013		20,000	47.92	8/13/2023	7,000	*	363,370
	8/12/2014		20,000	45.69	8/12/2024	7,300	*	378,943
	8/11/2015		23,000	44.72	8/11/2025	5,000	*	259,550
	8/11/2015					8,350	*	433,449
Zieser	1/28/2012					2,695		139,897
	8/13/2013		18,000	47.92	8/13/2023	6,500	*	337,415
	8/13/2013					2,500	*	129,775
	8/12/2014		18,000	45.69	8/12/2024	6,800	*	352,988
	8/11/2015		18,000	44.72	8/11/2025	6,800	*	352,988
	1/30/2016					3,750	*	194,663


(1)	Options ~~granted~~ vested or will vest ~~100%~~in full on the third anniversary of the grant date.

~~(2)~~

~~The exercise price for option grants prior to July 1, 2006 is equal to the average of the high and low prices on the date of grant.~~ (2)

The exercise price for options ~~granted after July 1, 2006~~ is equal to the NYSE closing price per share on the date of grant.

~~(3)~~

(3)

Awards of restricted stock and RSUs shown in this column which vest on the third anniversary of the grant date are followed by an (*). All other awards in this column will vest on the fifth anniversary of the grant date.

~~(4)~~

~~Calculated at~~(4)

The market value is calculated using the NYSE closing price ~~of the Company’s common stock~~ on June 30, ~~2014,~~2016, the last trading day of the fiscal year ($~~48.36)~~51.91).

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal ~~Year 2014~~2016

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise (#)

Value Realized
on Exercise ($)

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)

Value Realized
on Vesting ($)(1)

Lacy

240,000

1,641,900

26,432

1,270,557

Ceryanec⁽²⁾

27,000

402,300

14,300

720,535

Harty

—

—

8,000

385,600

Karpowicz

70,000

1,122,100

8,145

392,238

Zieser⁽³⁾

170,000

705,100

7,500

361,500

	Option Awards		Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1)	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)	Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2)
Lacy	145,000	2,436,000	29,535	1,341,466
Ceryanec	40,000	672,000	7,845	356,522
Harty	5,000	25,050	28,176	1,281,887
Karpowicz	-	-	11,173	502,250
Zieser	43,000	662,200	11,805	527,350

(1)

Value realized on exercise reflects the difference between the option exercise price and the market price at the time of exercise multiplied by the number of options exercised.

~~(1)~~	(2)	Value realized on vesting is computed by multiplying the closing price of the common stock on the date of vesting by the number of shares of restricted stock vesting on such date.
~~(2)~~	Mr. Ceryanec elected to defer the receipt of 14,300 shares upon vesting by converting the shares to SEUs to be held until his retirement or other termination, whichever is later. The total amount deferred was $720,535.
~~(3)~~	Mr. Zieser elected to defer the receipt of 7,500 shares upon vesting by converting the shares to SEUs to be held until his retirement or other termination, whichever is later. The total amount deferred was $361,500.

Pension Benefits in Fiscal ~~2014~~2016

The following table shows on a plan-by-plan basis for each NEO: the number of years of credited service (rounded to the nearest whole number), the present value of the accumulated benefit and the value of any payments made during the fiscal year. The present values are generally based on the assumptions used for financial reporting purposes as of the Company’s most recent fiscal year-end measurement date. For additional information concerning those assumptions, please see Note 8 to the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s ~~Annual Report on for the year ended June 30, 2014.~~ Form 10-K.Exceptions include

~~Table of Contents~~

the retirement age, which is assumed to be the earliest time at which a participant may retire under the plan without any benefit reduction due to age, and pre-retirement decrements, which are ignored. The following assumptions were used to calculate the present values in the table:

Table of Contents

Measurement date		June 30, 2016
~~Measurement date~~ Discount rate		~~June 30, 2014~~
~~Discount rate~~ Employees’ Retirement Income Plan		2.9%
~~Qualified~~ Replacement Benefit Plan		~~3.5%~~ 2.6%
~~Replacement~~ Supplemental Benefit Plan		3.4%
~~Supplemental~~		~~3.9%~~
Interest crediting rate
~~Qualified~~ Employees’ Retirement Income Plan		~~2.75%~~ 2.15%
Replacement Benefit Plan		~~2.65%~~ 2.00%
Supplemental Benefit Plan		~~3.15%~~ 2.65%
Annuity conversion rate		~~4.4%~~3.9%, unless specified by Employment Agreement
Annuity conversion mortality		~~2014~~2016 IRS Prescribed 417(e)(3) Unisex
Retirement age		65
Compensation and benefit limits		~~2014~~2016 levels
Salary increases		None
Pre-retirement decrements	None

Name	Plan Name	Years of Credited Service (#)	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)	Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
Lacy	Employees’ Retirement Income Plan	19	301,515	—
	Replacement Benefit Plan	19	2,184,734	—
	Supplemental Benefit Plan	17	12,557,079	—
Ceryanec	Employees’ Retirement Income Plan	8	92,466	—
	Replacement Benefit Plan	8	333,565	—
	Supplemental Benefit Plan	7	1,550,174	—
Harty	Employees’ Retirement Income Plan	12	160,895	—
	Replacement Benefit Plan	12	561,606	—
	Supplemental Benefit Plan	11	2,776,903	—
Karpowicz	Employees’ Retirement Income Plan	11	155,201	—
	Replacement Benefit Plan	11	783,664	—
	Supplemental Benefit Plan	10	4,556,981	—
Zieser	Employees’ Retirement Income Plan	18	266,311	—
	Replacement Benefit Plan	18	1,078,580	—
	Supplemental Benefit Plan	16	4,780,080	—

~~None~~

Name

Plan Name

Years of
Credited
Service (#)

Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit ($)

Payments During
Last Fiscal Year ($)

Lacy

Employees’ Retirement Income Plan

17

249,262

—

Replacement Benefit Plan

17

1,659,106

—

Supplemental Benefit Plan

15

9,053,495

—

Ceryanec

Employees’ Retirement Income Plan

6

62,491

—

Replacement Benefit Plan

6

194,585

—

Supplemental Benefit Plan

5

804,546

—

Harty

Employees’ Retirement Income Plan

10

124,279

—

Replacement Benefit Plan

10

370,100

—

Supplemental Benefit Plan

9

1,428,746

—

Karpowicz

Employees’ Retirement Income Plan

9

117,665

—

Replacement Benefit Plan

9

566,372

—

Supplemental Benefit Plan

8

2,881,666

—

Zieser

Employees’ Retirement Income Plan

16

218,352

—

Replacement Benefit Plan

16

834,597

—

Supplemental Benefit Plan

14

3,198,285

—

For a more complete description of the plans and their purposes, see page 20 of this Proxy Statement.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in Fiscal ~~Year 2014~~2016

The following table discloses contributions, earnings and balances under each defined contribution or other plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified for each of the NEOs. See page 1918 of this Proxy Statement for additional information concerning deferred compensation. The aggregate balance was determined by multiplying the number of SEUs held on June 30, ~~2014~~2016 (the last trading day of the fiscal year) ~~by$48.36,~~by $51.91, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on that date. Distributions are paid in accordance with the deferral election, which offers varying deferral periods and payment in lump sums or a series of annual installments following the end of the deferral period. All payments are also subject to Section 409A ~~restrictions.~~restrictions of the Internal Revenue Code.

Table of Contents

Name

Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year ($)

Aggregate Earnings in
Last Fiscal Year ($)(1)

Aggregate Withdrawals/
Distributions in
Last Fiscal Year ($)

Aggregate Balance at
Last
Fiscal Year-End ($)

Lacy

—

89,014

—

2,622,118

Ceryanec⁽²⁾

820,535

35,412

—

1,232,350

Harty

—

—

—

—

Karpowicz

—

—

—

—

Zieser

361,500

84,771

—

2,497,133

Name	Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)	Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1)	Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)	Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($)
Lacy	—	108,650	—	3,036,836
Ceryanec	272,860	79,018	—	2,217,295
Harty	—	—	—	—
Karpowicz	—	—	—	—
Zieser	110,023	125,797	—	3,599,310

	(1)
	~~(1)~~	Earnings shown in this column equal the dollar value of dividends on SEUs accrued during the last fiscal year. All dividends are reinvested as additional SEUs.
	~~(2)~~	~~$100,000 reported in the Executive Contributions column was also reported as a non-equity incentive award in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2014.~~

Potential Payments upon Termination

Employment and Other Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with each of the NEOs as summarized below. Each of the employment agreements described below provides for periods of non-solicitation, non-compete and confidentiality following termination.

On December 30, 2008 the Company entered into amendments to each employment ~~agreement.~~agreement for the NEOs that were employed by the Company at that time. Those amendments conform to the requirements of Section 409A of the ~~Tax~~Internal Revenue Code and all payouts described below shall be subject to the terms of Section 409A. The amendments provide for the delay of any payment or benefit provided by the employment agreement if such amount or benefit would be subject to or incur additional tax, and further, that any such deferred payment shall be accumulated and paid in a single lump sum, together with interest compounded annually for the period of the delay, on the earliest date on which such payment can be made without incurring any additional tax.

	1.
	1.	Lacy Employment Agreement. The Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Lacy effective July 1, 2006, the date he became President and CEO of the Company, and by ~~amendment on~~amendments dated December 30, 2008 and November 4, 2009, continued in effect through June 30, 2013, subject to automatic renewal for subsequent one-year terms. The amended agreement provides that Mr. Lacy’s minimum annual base salary shall be $810,000 and may be increased at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Lacy iswas a participant in the Meredith Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), is currently a participant in the 2014 Plan or successor plans, the ~~Meredith~~ Employees’ Retirement Income Plan, the ~~Meredith~~ Replacement Benefit Plan and the ~~Meredith~~ Supplemental Benefit Plan. Mr. Lacy’s target Annual Incentive under the 2004 Plan or successor plans will not be less than 100% of his base salary. The agreement or plan documents also ~~provides~~provide for payment to Mr. Lacy in the event his employment is terminated for various reasons as follows:

A.
	A.	If ~~his~~Mr. Lacy’s employment were terminated because of death, his base salary would be paid to the legal representative of his estate in substantially equal installments until the end of the month of the first anniversary of his death, any Annual Incentive as determined by the Compensation Committee would be prorated to the date of death, any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

B.
	B.	In the event of termination due to “Disability,” Mr. Lacy would receive 100% of his base salary for the first 12 months following such termination or through the end of the current term. Mr. Lacy would receive his target Annual Incentive for the initial year in which the ~~Disability~~disability occurs. In addition, any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

	C.
		C.	In the event of termination “Without Cause,” or due to “Failure to Re-Elect as CEO or Director,” Mr. Lacy would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment, within the Short-Term Deferral Period as defined in the agreement, equal to the sum of his base salary and target Annual Incentive through the end of the current term or 24 months, whichever is greater. Mr. Lacy would also be eligible for post-retirement welfare benefits, which would commence after June 30, ~~2014;~~2016; therefore, the value of those benefits for fiscal ~~2014~~2016 would be zero. In addition, any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

Table of Contents

D.
	D.	In the event of termination for “Cause,” Mr. Lacy would receive his base salary through the date of termination and any Annual Incentive under the 2004 Plan and the 2014 Plan would be prorated to the date of termination. All equity and other incentive awards subject to restriction would be forfeited.

E.
	E.	Because heMr. Lacy is “Retirement Eligible” under the Company’s retirement policy for all employees, any voluntary resignation would be considered retirement. Mr. Lacy would receive his current base salary through the date of termination, his Annual Incentive would be prorated for the fiscal year in which the termination occurred and any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award. He would also be a participant in the retiree welfare plan. In addition, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.


		The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would have been provided to Mr. Lacy if his employment had been terminated as of June 30, ~~2014,~~2016, under the circumstances specified.

For Cause ($)

Voluntary ($)

Without Cause ($)

Disability ($)

Death ($)

Payment equal to a multiple
of base salary in effect at
termination

N/A

N/A

1,950,000

975,000

975,000

Earned but unpaid Annual
Incentive (1)

979,081

979,081

979,081

N/A

979,081

Payment of target Annual
Incentive

N/A

N/A

1,950,000

975,000

N/A

Payment due under Cash
LTIPs

N/A

1,285,896

1,285,896

1,285,896

1,285,896

Continued health/welfare
benefits (2)(3)

N/A

N/A

29,531

N/A

N/A

Pension benefit (lump
sum) (4)(5)

10,913,778

10,913,778

10,913,778

N/A

10,913,778

Immediate vesting of stock
options (6)

N/A

4,880,610

4,880,610

4,880,610

4,880,610

Immediate vesting of
restricted stock (7)

N/A

4,190,346

4,190,346

4,190,346

4,190,346

	For Cause ($)		Voluntary ($)		Without Cause ($)		Disability ($)		Death ($)
Payment equal to a multiple of base salary in effect at termination		N/A		N/A		2,000,000		1,000,000		1,000,000
Earned but unpaid Annual Incentive (1)		2,123,532		2,123,532		2,123,532		N/A		2,123,532
Payment of target Annual Incentive		N/A		N/A		2,300,000		1,150,000		N/A
Payment due under Cash LTIPs		N/A		4,281,407		4,281,407		4,281,407		4,281,407
Continued health/welfare benefits (2)(3)		N/A		N/A		24,946		N/A		N/A
Pension benefit (lump sum) (4)(5)		14,799,692		14,799,692		14,799,692		N/A		14,799,692
Immediate vesting of stock options		N/A		1,131,000		1,131,000		1,131,000		1,131,000
Immediate vesting of restricted stock and RSUs		N/A		3,718,936		3,718,936		3,718,936		3,718,936

(1)

The amount due, if any, is the amount of the Annual Incentive set by the Compensation Committee at its August meeting.

(2)

Because Mr. Lacy is retirement eligible (age 55 with ten or more years of service) he would be able to participate in the retiree welfare plan.

(3)

Mr. Lacy’s employment agreement requires that the Company provide continued benefits to him and his eligible dependents in the event of termination “Without Cause” through the end of the current term of the agreement which would be June 30, ~~2014.~~

2016.

(4)

Mr. Lacy’s employment agreement also provides that if his employment is terminated voluntarily due to a substantial change in his position, duties or responsibilities, his retirement benefits will be accelerated as if the termination were “Without Cause.”

	(5)	Disabled employees are considered active participants in all retirement plans.

~~(6)~~

~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of stock options.~~

~~(7)~~

~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock under the terms of the award agreements.~~

	2.
	2.	Ceryanec Employment Agreement. The Company entered into ana new agreement with Mr. Ceryanec ~~which became~~ effective ~~October 20, 2008, the date he became Chief Financial Officer of the Company.~~June 1, 2015. The agreement ~~as amended on December 30, 2008,~~ provides ~~that any increases in~~for a minimum annual base salary ~~after July 1, 2009 or changes in~~of $590,000 and target Annual Incentive ~~will~~of 70% of base salary, which may be ~~determined by~~increased at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. ~~The employment agreement also provided a one-time signing bonus of $100,000, one-half to be paid within 30 days of signing and one-half to be paid within 30 days after~~ Mr. Ceryanec ~~moved his permanent residence to a location within the Des Moines metropolitan area. The agreement also provided for the reimbursement of certain relocation expenses. Mr. Ceryanec is~~was a participant in the 2004 Plan, is currently a participant in the 2014 Plan or successor plans, the ~~Meredith~~ Employees’ Retirement Income Plan, the ~~Meredith~~ Replacement Benefit Plan and the ~~Meredith~~ Supplemental Benefit Plan. ~~Beginning with fiscal 2011, Mr. Ceryanec’s target Annual Incentive was set at 70% of base salary.~~ The agreement or plan documents also ~~provides~~provide for payment to Mr. Ceryanec in the event his employment is terminated for various reasons as follows:

A.
	A.	If ~~his~~Mr. Ceryanec’s employment were terminated because of death, 100% of his base salary would be paid to the legal representative of his estate through the last day of the month in which his death occurred, any Annual Incentive earned under the 2004 Plan and the 2014 Plan would be prorated for the fiscal year, any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

	B.
		B.	In the event of termination due to “Disability,” Mr. Ceryanec’s base salary would be paid through the last day of the month in which written notice of termination was given, ~~any Annual Incentive earned~~all awards under ~~the 2004 Plan~~incentive plans would be ~~prorated to~~handled in accordance with the ~~date~~terms of ~~termination~~the relevant plan and agreements, and any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award. In addition, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

~~Table of Contents~~

C.
	C.	In the event of termination “Without Cause,” Mr. Ceryanec, in return for a full release of all employment-related claims, would receive his base salary for a period of 1218 months following the date of notice of termination, ~~any Annual Incentive earned under the 2004 Plan~~plus he would ~~be prorated and any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award.~~ also

Table of Contents

receive a lump sum payment equal to his target Annual Incentive, prorated to the date on which notice is given. If Mr. Ceryanec fails to execute the release described above, he would receive only his base salary through the date of notice of termination. In addition, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

Mr. Ceryanec’s employment agreement also provides that should there be a change in title, location or duties during the term of the agreement, he will have the right to terminate his employment and such voluntarily termination from Meredith shall be treated as a termination Without Cause as described above.

D.
	D.	In the event of voluntary termination or termination for “Cause,” Mr. Ceryanec would receive only his base salary through the date of termination. All equity and other incentive awards subject to restriction would be forfeited.

The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would have been provided to Mr. Ceryanec if his employment had been terminated as of June 30, 2016, under the circumstances specified.

	For Cause ($)	Voluntary ($)	Without Cause ($)	Disability ($)	Death ($)
Payment equal to a multiple of base salary in effect at termination	N/A	N/A	885,000	N/A	N/A
Earned but unpaid Annual Incentive (1)	N/A	N/A	812,652	812,652	812,652
Payment due under Cash LTIPs	N/A	324,025	624,025	848,932	848,932
Pension benefit (lump sum) (2)(3)	1,673,213	1,673,213	1,673,213	N/A	1,673,213
Immediate vesting of stock options	N/A	N/A	313,200	313,200	313,200
Immediate vesting of restricted stock and RSUs	N/A	N/A	1,837,666	1,837,666	1,837,666

The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would have been provided to Mr. Ceryanec if his employment had been terminated as of June 30, 2014, under the circumstances specified.

For Cause ($)

Voluntary ($)

Without Cause ($)

Disability ($)

Death ($)

Payment equal to a multiple
of base salary in effect at
termination

N/A

N/A

560,000

N/A

N/A

Earned but unpaid Annual
Incentive (1)

N/A

N/A

447,549

447,549

447,549

Payment due under Cash
LTIPs

N/A

N/A

370,825

370,825

370,825

Pension benefit (lump
sum) (2)

68,108

68,108

68,108

N/A

68,108

Immediate vesting of stock
options (3)

N/A

N/A

N/A

1,345,620

1,345,620

Immediate vesting of
restricted stock (4)

N/A

N/A

N/A

1,599,314

1,599,314

	(1)
	~~(1)~~	The amount due, if any, is the amount of the Annual Incentive set by the Compensation Committee at its August meeting.

(2)

In the event of termination “Without Cause,” Mr. Ceryanec shall be presumed to have met eligibility requirements of the Replacement Benefit Plan and the Supplemental Benefit Plan or any successor plans and shall be entitled to the amounts that have accrued under such plans through the date of termination.

	(3)	Disabled employees are considered active participants in all retirement plans.

~~(3)~~

~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of all outstanding stock options.~~

~~(4)~~

~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of restricted stock.~~

	3.
	3.	Harty Employment Agreement.

		The Company entered into ~~a new~~an employment agreement with Mr. Harty effective July 1, 2013. The agreement provides for a minimum annual base salary of $700,000 and target Annual Incentive of 75% of base salary, which may be increased at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. ~~In August, 2013, the Committee chose to increase his base salary to $725,000 and his target Annual Incentive to 80% of annual base salary effective July 1, 2013.~~ Mr. Harty ~~is also~~was a participant in the 2004 Plan, is currently a participant in the ~~Meredith~~2014 Plan or successor plans, the Employees’ Retirement Income Plan, the ~~Meredith~~ Replacement Benefit Plan and the ~~Meredith~~ Supplemental Benefit Plan. The agreement ~~provides~~or plan documents also provide for payment to Mr. Harty in the event his employment ~~was~~is terminated for various reasons as follows:

A.
	A.	~~In the case~~If Mr. Harty’s employment were terminated because of ~~termination due to~~ death, his base salary would be paid to the legal representative of his estate through the date of death, and any Annual Incentive earned under the 2004 Plan or the 2014 Plan would be prorated to the date of ~~death.~~death and any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award. In addition, all awards of restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for their full unexpired term.

B.
	B.	In the event of termination due to “Disability,” Mr. Harty would receive his base salary through the date of ~~Disability. Under~~disability. All awards under incentive plans would be handled in accordance with the terms of the ~~Company’s Long-Term Disability Plan, he~~relevant plan and agreements, and any Cash LTIP would ~~receive $15,000 per month until he reaches retirement age, up~~be paid out according to ~~a maximum payout~~the terms of ~~$865,000.~~the award. In addition, all restricted stock ~~awards~~and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option. ~~All awards under incentive plans would be handled in accordance with the terms of the relevant plan and agreements.~~

C.
	C.	In the event of termination “Without Cause,” Mr. Harty, in return for a full release of all employment-related claims, would receive his base salary through the date on which notice is given, plus separation payments equal to his base salary for a period of 18 months following the date of such notice. He would also receive a lump sum payment equal to his target Annual Incentive, prorated to the date on which notice is given. If Mr. Harty fails to execute the release described above, he would receive only his base salary through the date of notice of termination.

		~~Mr. Harty’s employment agreement also provides that should there be a change in title, location or duties during~~ In addition, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the ~~Agreement, he will have the right to terminate his employment and such voluntarily termination from Meredith shall be treated as a termination Without Cause as described above.~~ option.

Table of Contents

Mr. Harty’s employment agreement also provides that should there be a change in title, location or duties during the term of the agreement, he will have the right to terminate his employment and such voluntarily termination from Meredith shall be treated as a termination Without Cause as described above.

D.
	D.	In the event of termination for “Cause,” Mr. Harty would receive his base salary only through the date of termination. All equity or incentive awards subject to restriction would be forfeited.

On August 10, 2016, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Harty. The agreement provides for an initial base salary of $800,000, target Annual Incentive of no less than 90% of base salary and participation in the Cash LTIP. With the new agreement, Mr. Harty was granted (i) 33,000 stock options with a three year cliff vesting schedule and a strike price equal to the fair market value of Meredith common stock on the date of the award and (ii) 10,000 RSUs with a three year cliff vesting schedule.

The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would have been provided to Mr. Harty if his employment had been terminated as of June 30, 2016, under the circumstances specified and reflects the terms of his employment agreement in effect at such time.

	For Cause ($)		Voluntary ($)		Without Cause ($)(1)		Disability ($)		Death ($)
Payment equal to a multiple of base salary in effect at termination		N/A		N/A		1,140,000		N/A		N/A
Earned but unpaid Annual Incentive (2)		N/A		N/A		923,373		923,373		923,373
Payment due under Cash LTIPs		N/A		432,033		832,034		1,131,909		1,131,909
Pension benefit (lump sum) (3)(4)		175,016		175,016		2,875,502		N/A		175,016
Immediate vesting of stock options		N/A		N/A		400,200		400,200		400,200
Immediate vesting of restricted stock and RSUs		N/A		N/A		2,155,511		2,155,511		2,155,511

The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would have been provided to Mr. Harty if his employment had been terminated as of June 30, 2014, under the circumstances specified.

For Cause ($)

Voluntary ($)

Without Cause ($)(1)

Disability ($)

Death ($)

Payment equal to a multiple
of base salary in effect at
termination

N/A

N/A

1,087,500

N/A

N/A

Earned but unpaid Annual
Incentive(2)

N/A

N/A

N/A

471,235

471,235

Payment of target Annual
Incentive

N/A

N/A

580,000

N/A

N/A

Payment due under Cash
LTIPs

N/A

N/A

438,001

438,001

438,001

Pension benefit (lump
sum) (3)

137,100

137,100

1,506,539

N/A

137,100

Immediate vesting of stock
options (4)

N/A

N/A

N/A

1,529,270

1,529,270

Immediate vesting of
restricted stock (5)

N/A

N/A

N/A

2,902,229

2,902,229

	(1)
	~~(1)~~	The payments in this column are to be paid in return for a signed full release of all employment-related claims.

(2)

The amount due, if any, is the amount of the Annual Incentive set by the Compensation Committee at its August meeting.

(3)

In the event of termination “Without Cause,” Mr. Harty shall be presumed to have met eligibility requirements of the Replacement Benefit Plan and the Supplemental Benefit Plan or any successor plans and shall be entitled to the amounts that have accrued under such plans through the date of termination.

	(4)	Disabled employees are considered active participants in all retirement plans.

~~(4)~~

~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of all outstanding stock options.~~

~~(5)~~

~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of restricted stock under the terms of the award agreements.~~

	4.
	4.	Karpowicz Employment Agreement. ~~On February 14, 2005, the~~The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Karpowicz effective June 1, 2015, which was subsequently amended ~~on December~~to extend through June 30, ~~2008.~~2018. The agreement provides for a minimum annual base salary of $725,000 and target Annual Incentive of 85% of base salary, which may be increased at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Karpowicz ~~is eligible to participate~~also received a one-time signing bonus of 5,000 RSUs upon execution of an award agreement. Mr. Karpowicz was a participant in the 2004 Plan, is currently a participant in the 2014 Plan or successor plans, the ~~Meredith~~ Employees’ Retirement Income Plan, the ~~Meredith~~ Replacement Benefit Plan and the ~~Meredith~~ Supplemental Benefit Plan. The agreement ~~provides~~or plan documents also provide for payment to Mr. Karpowicz in the event his employment ~~was~~is terminated for various reasons as follows:

A.
	A.	~~In the event~~If Mr. Karpowicz’s employment were terminated because of ~~termination due to~~ death, ~~or “Disability,” Mr. Karpowicz or his estate would receive~~ his base salary would be paid to the legal representative of his estate through the ~~last day~~date of ~~the month in which such termination occurs plus~~death, and any Annual Incentive earned under the 2004 Plan or the 2014 Plan would be prorated to the date of ~~termination.~~death. In addition, any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

B.
	B.	In the event of termination ~~for “Cause” or voluntary termination,~~due to “Disability,” Mr. Karpowicz would receive ~~only~~ his base salary through the date of ~~termination.~~disability. All ~~equity and~~awards under incentive ~~awards subject to restriction~~plans would be ~~forfeited.~~ handled in accordance with the terms of the relevant plan and agreements, and any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award. In addition, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

	C.
		C.	In the event of termination “Without Cause,” Mr. Karpowicz, in return for a full release of all employment-related claims, would be entitled to receive his base salary for a period of 12 months following the date of ~~termination plus~~termination. He would also receive a ~~proportionate share of any 2004 Plan~~lump sum payment equal to his target Annual ~~Incentive.~~Incentive, prorated to the date on which notice is

Table of Contents

given. If Mr. Karpowicz fails to execute the release described above, he would receive only his base salary through the date of notice of termination. In addition, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

Mr. Karpowicz’s employment agreement also provides that should there be a change in title, location or duties during the term of the agreement, he will have the right to terminate his employment and such voluntarily termination from Meredith shall be treated as a termination Without Cause as described above.

In the event of termination for “Cause,” Mr. Karpowicz would receive only his base salary through the date of termination. Any earned but unpaid Annual Incentive would be forfeited as would all other incentive or equity awards subject to restriction.

Because Mr. Karpowicz is “Retirement Eligible” under the Company’s retirement policy for all employees, any voluntary resignation would be considered retirement. Mr. Karpowicz would receive his current base salary through the date of termination, his Annual Incentive would be prorated for the fiscal year in which the termination occurred and any Cash LTIP ~~and other equity awards~~ would be paid out according to the terms of the ~~awards.~~

award. In addition, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

~~Table~~

The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would have been provided to Mr. Karpowicz if his employment had been terminated as of ~~Contents~~June 30, 2016, under the circumstances specified.

	For Cause ($)	Voluntary ($)	Without Cause ($)	Disability ($)	Death ($)
Payment equal to a multiple of base salary in effect at termination	N/A	N/A	725,000	N/A	N/A
Earned but unpaid Annual Incentive (1)	1,134,483	1,134,483	1,134,483	1,134,483	1,134,483
Payment due under Cash LTIPs	N/A	1,433,027	1,433,027	1,433,027	1,433,027
Pension benefit (lump sum) (2)(3)	5,296,838	5,296,838	5,296,838	N/A	5,296,838
Immediate vesting of stock options	N/A	369,570	369,570	369,570	369,570
Immediate vesting of restricted stock and RSUs	N/A	1,746,097	1,746,097	1,746,097	1,746,097


(1)	The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would have been provided to Mr. Karpowicz if his employment had been terminated as of June 30, 2014, under the circumstances specified.

For Cause ($)

Voluntary ($)

Without Cause ($)

Disability ($)

Death ($)
Payment equal to a multiple of base salary in effect at termination

N/A

N/A

705,000

N/A

N/A
Earned but unpaid Annual Incentive (1)

N/A

N/A

665,935

665,935

665,935
Payment due under Cash LTIPs

N/A

N/A

423,947

423,947

423,947
Pension benefit (lump sum) (2)

3,326,790

3,326,790

3,326,790

N/A

3,326,790
Immediate vesting of stock options (3)

N/A

N/A

N/A

1,491,660

1,491,660
Immediate vesting of restricted stock (4)

N/A

N/A

N/A

1,688,441

1,688,441


	~~(1)~~	The amount due, if any, is the amount of the Annual Incentive set by the Compensation Committee at its August meeting.

(2)

In the event of termination “Without Cause,” Mr. Karpowicz shall be presumed to have met eligibility requirements of the Replacement Benefit Plan and the Supplemental Benefit Plan or any successor plans and shall be entitled to the amounts that have accrued under such plans through the date of termination.

	(3)	Disabled employees are considered active participants in all retirement plans.

~~(3)~~

~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of all outstanding stock options.~~

~~(4)~~

~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of restricted stock under the terms of the award agreements.~~

Zieser Employment Agreement. The Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Zieser, which became effective August 12, 2008 and continued in effect through June 30, ~~2013.~~2011. The term of employment automatically renews for subsequent one-year terms unless written notice is given by either party. The agreement, as amended on December 30,

2008, provides for a minimum annual base salary of $600,000 with any increase in base salary to be determined by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Zieser iswas a participant in the 2004 Plan, is a current participant in the 2014 Plan or successor plans, the ~~Meredith~~ Employees’ Retirement Income Plan, the ~~Meredith~~ Replacement Benefit Plan and the ~~Meredith~~ Supplemental Benefit Plan. Mr. Zieser’s target Annual Incentive under the 2004 Plan or successor plans will be no less than 70% of his base salary. The agreement or plan documents also ~~provides~~provide for payment to Mr. Zieser in the event his employment is terminated for various reasons as follows:

A.
	A.	If ~~his~~Mr. Zieser’s employment were terminated because of death, ~~any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award, all restricted stock would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option,~~ his base salary would be paid to the legal representative of his estate in equal installments until the end of the month of the first anniversary of his death and any Annual Incentive earned under the 2004 Plan or the 2014 Plan, as determined by the Compensation Committee at its meeting following the end of the fiscal year, would be prorated to the date of death. In addition, any Cash LTIP award would be paid out according to the terms of the award, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

	B.
		B.	In the event of termination due to “Disability,” Mr. Zieser would receive his base salary at the lesser of 100% for 12 months or to the end of the current term and his target Annual Incentive for the fiscal year in which the ~~Disability~~ disability

Table of Contents

	occurred. In addition, any Cash LTIP award would be paid out according to the terms of the award, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

C.	C.	In the event of termination “Without Cause,” Mr. Zieser would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment within the Short-Term Deferral Period as defined in the agreement, equal to sum of his base salary and target Annual Incentive through the end of the current term or 18 months, whichever is greater. In addition, any Cash LTIP award would be paid out according to the terms of the award, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

	D. Mr. Zieser’s employment agreement also provides that should there be a change in title, location or duties during the term of the agreement, he will have the right to terminate his employment and such voluntarily termination from Meredith shall be treated as a termination Without Cause as described above.

D.	In the event of ~~voluntary termination or~~ termination for “Cause,” Mr. Zieser would receive only his base salary through the date of termination. Any earned but unpaid Annual Incentive would be forfeited as would all other incentive or equity awards subject to restriction.

~~Table of Contents~~



	E.	Because Mr. Zieser is “Retirement Eligible” under the Company’s retirement policy for all employees, any voluntary resignation would be considered retirement. Mr. Zieser would receive his current base salary through the date of termination, his Annual Incentive would be prorated for the fiscal year in which the termination occurred and any Cash LTIP would be paid out according to the terms of the award. He would also be a participant in the retiree welfare plan. In addition, all restricted stock and RSUs would vest and all stock options would vest and remain exercisable for the full unexpired term of the option.

	The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would have been provided to Mr. Zieser if his employment had been terminated as of June 30, ~~2014,~~2016, under the circumstances specified.

For Cause ($)

Voluntary ($)

Without Cause ($)

Disability ($)

Death ($)
Payment equal to a multiple of base salary in effect at termination

N/A

N/A

967,500

645,000

645,000
Earned but unpaid Annual Incentive (1)

N/A

N/A

555,571

555,571

555,571
Payment of target Annual Incentive

N/A

N/A

677,250

451,500

N/A
Payment due under Cash LTIPs

N/A

N/A

403,898

403,898

403,898
Continued health/welfare benefits (2)

N/A

N/A

19,358

N/A

N/A
Pension benefit (lump
sum) (3)(4)

234,966

234,966

3,564,705

N/A

234,966
Immediate vesting of stock options (5)

N/A

N/A

1,454,490

1,454,490

1,454,490
Immediate vesting of restricted stock (6)

N/A

N/A

1,595,880

1,595,880

1,595,880

	For Cause ($)	Voluntary ($)	Without Cause ($)	Disability ($)	Death ($)
Payment equal to a multiple of base salary in effect at termination	N/A	N/A	997,500	665,000	665,000
Earned but unpaid Annual Incentive (1)	844,374	844,374	844,374	844,374	844,374
Payment of target Annual Incentive	N/A	N/A	698,250	465,500	N/A
Payment due under Cash LTIPs	N/A	1,264,961	1,264,961	1,264,961	1,264,961
Continued health/welfare benefits (2)	N/A	N/A	21,287	N/A	N/A
Pension benefit (lump sum) (3)(4)	5,337,089	5,337,089	5,337,089	N/A	5,337,089
Immediate vesting of stock options	N/A	313,200	313,200	313,200	313,200
Immediate vesting of restricted stock and RSUs	N/A	1,507,726	1,507,726	1,507,726	1,507,726

	(1)
	~~(1)~~	The amount due, if any, is the amount of the Annual Incentive set by the Compensation Committee at its August meeting.
	(2)	In the event of termination “Without Cause,” the benefits would be continued through the end of the current term of the ~~Agreement~~agreement which would be June 30, ~~2015.~~ 2016.
	(3)	In the event of termination “Without Cause,” Mr. Zieser shall be presumed to have met eligibility requirements ~~specified in Section 2.4~~ of the ~~Meredith~~ Replacement Benefit Plan and the ~~Meredith~~ Supplemental Benefit Plan or any successor plans and shall be entitled to the amounts that have accrued under such plans through the date of termination.
	(4)	Disabled employees are considered active participants in all retirement plans.
	~~(5)~~	~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of all outstanding stock options.~~
	~~(6)~~	~~Reflects the benefit of the immediate vesting of restricted stock under the terms of the award agreements~~

Change in Control

The Company has entered into Amended and Restated Severance Agreements (“CIC Agreements”) with each of the NEOs. The CIC Agreements provide for a double trigger, namely a Change in Control of the Company and the termination of the officer within two years of such a Change in Control. The CIC Agreements provide for payments and other benefits if the executive is terminated within two years of a Change in Control of the Company for any reason other than disability, mandatory retirement, “Cause” or voluntary termination other than for “Good Reason.” “Good Reason” ~~includes~~includes: an adverse substantial change in position, duties, responsibilities or status; a reduction in base salary; elimination of any benefit or incentive plan; relocation to a place more

Table of Contents

than 25 miles ~~distant~~distance and other terms as more fully described in the CIC Agreements. If an executive’s employment is terminated prior to the date a Change in Control occurs, and if there is a reasonable basis that such termination (1) was at the request of a third party that has taken steps reasonably calculated to effect a Change in Control of the Company or (2) otherwise arose in connection with or anticipation of a Change in Control, then such termination shall be treated as a termination following a Change in Control of the Company. A Change in Control as defined in the CIC Agreements is summarized briefly as follows:

	1.
	1.	The acquisition by any person or entity of the beneficial ownership of more than 20% of either (a) the then outstanding common stock of the Company or (b) the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company;

	2.	The directors who were incumbent at the time of the execution of the CIC Agreement or their successors cease to constitute at least a majority of the Board (not including any director whose nomination or election occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a person or entity other than the Board);

	3.	The consummation of certain types of transactions including mergers and the sale of all, or substantially all, of the Company’s assets; or

	4.	Approval by the shareholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

Immediately upon a Change in Control of the Company, all outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights shall become exercisable, all restrictions on restricted stock and RSUs shall lapse and all performance awards shall be paid or delivered as if the performance goals had been fully achieved. The benefit of the immediate vesting of the stock options, ~~and~~ restricted stock, RSUs and payments under performance awards would have been as follows had a Change in Control occurred on June 30, ~~2014.~~2016.

~~Table of Contents~~


Award	Lacy ($)	Ceryanec ($)	Harty ($)	Karpowicz ($)	Zieser ($)	Lacy ($)		Ceryanec ($)		Harty ($)		Karpowicz ($)		Zieser ($)
Restricted Stock	4,190,346	1,599,314	2,902,229	1,688,441	1,595,880
Restricted Stock / RSUs							3,718,936		1,837,666		2,155,511		1,746,097		1,507,726
Options	4,880,610	1,345,620	1,529,270	1,491,660	1,454,490		1,131,000		313,200		400,200		369,570		313,200
Cash LTIPs	2,347,761	666,010	815,920	765,920	724,284		4,281,407		1,167,656		1,556,875		1,433,027		1,264,961

Payment Obligations upon Termination Due to Change in Control

The following table sets forth the payment obligations under the CIC Agreements if the NEO’s employment is terminated as described above in advance of or within two years of a Change in Control of the Company. The tables assume that the termination took place on June 30, ~~2014.~~2016.

Obligation

~~Obligation~~

NEO’s annual base salary times three (based upon the highest annual rate of salary earned during the preceding 12-month period) (1)

Annual Bonus times three (higher of the target incentive for the year in which the date of termination occurs or the highest annual incentive compensation paid in respect of the three fiscal years immediately prior to the year in which the Change in Control occurred) (1)

Any earned and due Annual Incentive payments (1)

Prorated Annual Bonus through the date of termination (1)

Immediate vesting and payout of awards under any Cash LTIP (1)

Accrued vacation pay (1)

Any compensation previously deferred (with accrued interest or earnings) (1)

Retirement benefits (plus three years from the date of termination) (1)(2)

Annual matching contribution under the tax-qualified defined contribution plan times three, for each plan (1)

Continuation of medical, dental and life insurance for three years after the date of termination (3)

Continuation of short-term and long-term disability for three years after the date of termination (3)

Continuation of all programs and perquisites for three years after the date of termination (3)

Gross-up payment for tax liabilities (4)

Immediate vesting of equity awards under stock plans


(1)	These amounts are to be paid as a lump sum within five days of the date of termination out of the Company’s (or its successor’s) assets.
~~(2)~~	(2)	The retirement benefit is to be calculated as though the NEO is fully vested and has attained 36 additional months of age under the plans (but not to reduce the NEO’s life expectancy).
~~(3)~~	(3)	The benefits are to be continued for three years from the date of termination at the level in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control or the level in effect at the date of termination, whichever is most favorable to the NEO.
~~(4)~~	(4)	The Company may pay directly to the IRS or other taxing authority, for the benefit of the NEO.

Table of Contents

1.
	1.	Base Salary. The CIC Agreements provide for the lump sum payment of three times the NEO’s current annual base salary. The following table sets forth the amount of such payments to each NEO.

Lacy
Ceryanec
Harty
Karpowicz
Zieser
$2,925,000
$1,680,000
$2,175,000
$2,115,000
$1,935,000

Lacy		Ceryanec		Harty		Karpowicz		Zieser
$3,000,000		$1,770,000		$2,280,000		$2,175,000		$1,995,000

2.
	2.	Annual Bonus. The CIC Agreements provide for the lump sum payment of three times the Annual Bonus, as defined in the CIC Agreements. The following table shows the amount of such payments to each NEO.

Lacy
Ceryanec
Harty
Karpowicz
Zieser
$3,975,000
$1,679,580
$1,577,988
$2,878,857
$2,029,098

Lacy		Ceryanec		Harty		Karpowicz		Zieser
$6,370,596		$2,437,956		$2,770,119		$3,403,449		$2,533,122

3.
	3.	Earned but Unpaid Annual Incentive. The CIC Agreements provide for the lump sum payment of any previously earned and due annual incentive payments as defined in the CIC Agreements. The following table shows the amount of such payments to each NEO.

Lacy
Ceryanec
Harty
Karpowicz
Zieser
$979,081
$447,549
$471,235
$665,935
$555,571

Lacy		Ceryanec		Harty		Karpowicz		Zieser
$2,123,532		$812,652		$923,373		$1,134,483		$844,374

4.
	4.	Prorated Annual Bonus. The CIC Agreements provide for the lump sum payment of the Annual Bonus as defined in the CIC Agreements pro rata to the date of termination. If termination due to Change in Control had occurred on June 30, ~~2014~~2016 there would be no prorated Annual Bonus.

5.	5.	Retiree Welfare Benefits. The CIC Agreements provide for an additional three years of age and service to be added to each NEO’s post-retirement welfare benefits (including medical, dental and life). ~~Mr.~~Messrs. Lacy, ~~currently meets the requirements to~~

~~Table of Contents~~


		~~retire and participate in the retiree welfare plan. With the additional three years, Mr.~~ Karpowicz and ~~Mr.~~ Zieser ~~would also~~currently meet the ~~age and service~~ requirements to retire and participate in the retiree welfare plan. None of the other NEOs would meet the eligibility requirements. The terms of the CIC Agreements provide that active welfare benefits would continue for three years and retiree welfare benefits would not commence until the three-year period is over. Therefore, the value of the retiree welfare benefits provided from July 1, ~~2013~~2015 through June 30, ~~2014~~2016 is zero.

6.	6.	Pension Benefits. The CIC Agreements provide for an additional three years of age and service to be added (without affecting the life expectancy) in calculating each NEO’s pension benefit in the event of a Change in Control. The following table shows the amount of such payments to each NEO.

Lacy
Ceryanec
Harty
Karpowicz
Zieser
16,438,095
1,846,386
3,006,551
6,335,177
5,486,093

Lacy		Ceryanec		Harty		Karpowicz		Zieser
22,427,730		3,289,925		5,192,762		7,658,881		7,972,510

7.
	7.	Continuation of Benefits and Perquisites. The CIC Agreements provide that the NEO and his eligible dependents shall continue, to the extent permitted by law, to be covered by all NEO services, programs, perquisites and insurance plans or programs in effect in which the NEO participated immediately prior to the time of the Change in Control, for a period of 36 months after the NEO’s date of termination. The following table shows the cost to the Company for each of the NEOs for each of the benefits and perquisites.

Perquisite/Benefit	Lacy ($)	Ceryanec ($)	Harty ($)	Karpowicz ($)	Zieser ($)
Matching contribution to tax-qualified defined contribution plan	31,800	31,800	31,800	31,800	31,800
Continuation of medical and dental insurance for 36 months	21,348	21,348	36,242	21,348	32,696
Continuation of group, NEO supplemental life and split-dollar life insurance for 36 months	33,210	11,025	10,458	4,740	10,383
Continuation of short-term, long-term and NEO long- term disability for 36 months	20,193	20,615	15,123	11,495	20,781
Continuation of professional fees reimbursement for 36 months (calculated at maximum)	30,000	30,000	30,000	30,000	30,000
Continuation of club dues and auto allowance for 36 months	55,872	58,511	30,692	51,996	57,473

Perquisite/Benefit

Lacy ($)

Ceryanec ($)

Harty ($)

Karpowicz ($)

Zieser ($)

Matching contribution to tax-qualified defined contribution plan

31,200

31,200

31,200

31,200

31,200

Continuation of medical and dental insurance for 36 months

35,157

35,038

34,888

23,207

33,679

Continuation of group and NEO supplemental life insurance for 36 months

22,107

11,025

4,473

4,110

6,597

Continuation of short-term, long-term and NEO long-term disability for 36 months

30,794

13,163

10,238

23,509

17,797

Continuation of professional fees reimbursement for 36 months (calculated at maximum)

29,780

29,780

29,780

29,780

29,780

Continuation of club dues and auto allowance for 36 months

55,634

59,887

72,275

79,317

54,408

Table of Contents

8.
	8.	Gross-up Payments. The CIC Agreements provide that the Company will provide to the NEO a “Gross-up” payment to cover any excise taxes incurred under Section 4999 of the ~~Tax~~Internal Revenue Code, including all other income-related taxes. Under those circumstances, each NEO would be entitled to receive the following amounts.

Lacy
Ceryanec
Harty
Karpowicz
Zieser
5,726,130
2,650,865
2,869,368
4,006,247
2,868,565

Lacy		Ceryanec		Harty		Karpowicz		Zieser
—		3,921,659		6,579,081		3,398,580		3,209,750

9.
	9.	Immediate Vesting of All Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Options and Performance-Based Awards. Upon termination due to a Change in Control, all restricted stock and stock options shall vest immediately and all performance awards shall be paid or delivered as if the performance goals had been fully achieved. The benefit of the immediate vesting of the stock options, ~~and~~ restricted stock and RSUs and payments under performance awards would have been as follows as of June 30, ~~2014.~~ 2016.

Award

Lacy ($)

Ceryanec ($)

Harty ($)

Karpowicz ($)

Zieser ($)

Restricted Stock

4,190,346

1,599,314

2,902,229

1,688,441

1,595,880

Options

4,880,610

1,345,620

1,529,270

1,491,660

1,454,490

Cash LTIPs

2,347,761

   666,010

   815,920

   765,920

   724,284

Award	Lacy ($)	Ceryanec ($)	Harty ($)	Karpowicz ($)	Zieser ($)
Restricted Stock / RSUs	3,718,936	1,837,666	2,155,511	1,746,097	1,507,726
Options	1,131,000	313,200	400,200	369,570	313,200
Cash LTIPs	4,281,407	1,167,656	1,556,875	1,433,027	1,264,961

Execution of a release of claims is not a prerequisite to the receipt of payments under the CIC Agreements. The CIC Agreements do not include non-compete, non-solicit, non-disparagement or confidentiality provisions. The NEOs are under no obligation to seek other employment nor shall any compensation earned by the NEOs reduce the amount of any payment provided for under the CIC Agreements.

~~Table of Contents~~

COMPONENTS OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Employee directors receive no additional compensation for board service. For calendar ~~2014,~~year 2016, the annual board retainer for non-employee directors was $75,000 with an additional committee member retainer of $10,000 and an additional committee ~~chair~~chairman retainer of $20,000. Non-employee directors may elect to convert all or half of the annual board retainer, including any additional committee retainers, into restricted stock or SEUs as follows: 105% of the retainer may be received as restricted stock or as SEUs or 50% of the retainer may be received in cash and 52.5% of the retainer received as restricted stock or SEUs. Restricted stock pays dividends and vests one-third each year on the first three anniversaries of the grant date or upon the director’s retirement from the Board. SEUs are fully vested but are paid out as common stock on a one-for-one basis only upon the director’s resignation, retirement or ~~retirement from~~other termination of service on the Board. Dividends on SEUs are reinvested.

Each year, on the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, each non-employee director receives an equity grant with a fair market value of $100,000, half in restricted stock and half in nonqualified stock options. One-third of the number of shares of restricted stock and options granted vests each year on the first three anniversaries of the grant date. Options have an exercise price equal to the closing price on the date of the grant and expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date.

Upon election to the Board, each new non-employee director may choose to receive a grant of 1,200 shares of restricted stock which vests one-third each year on the first three anniversaries of the date of the grant or a grant of 1,200 SEUs which, although fully vested, are paid out as common stock on a one-for-one basis only upon the director’s resignation, retirement or other termination of service on the Board.

For calendar ~~2014,~~year 2016, four of ~~nine~~eight non-employee directors elected to receive all or ~~50%~~52.5% of their retainer in the form of restricted stock or SEUs. Fees paid in equity are awarded on the date of the Annual Meeting. Cash retainers are paid in advance in quarterly installments. The Company also reimburses directors for out-of-pocket expenses related to attendance at Board and committee meetings. The compensation paid to each non-employee director during fiscal ~~2014~~2016 is shown in the table below.

Table of Contents

Director Compensation for Fiscal ~~2014~~2016

Name

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)

Stock Awards
($)(1)(3)(5)(6)

Option Awards
($)(2)(3)(5)(6)

Total ($)

Berg⁽⁴⁾

47,500

99,931

49,873

197,304

Coleman⁽⁴⁾

—

149,792

49,873

199,665

Craigie⁽⁵⁾

71,250

—

—

71,250

Frazier

105,000

50,018

49,873

204,891

Henry

105,000

50,018

49,873

204,891

Johnson⁽⁴⁾

—

160,309

49,873

210,182

Marineau

105,000

50,018

49,873

204,891

Tallett⁽⁴⁾

47,500

99,931

49,873

197,304

	Fees Earned or	Stock Awards	Option Awards
Name	Paid in Cash ($)	($)(1)(3)(4)(5)	($)(2)(3)(5)	Total ($)
Baer	23,750	149,774	50,008	223,532
Berg	23,750	149,774	50,008	223,532
Coleman	95,000	50,019	50,008	195,027
Frazier	105,000	50,019	50,008	205,027
Henry	105,000	50,019	50,008	205,027
Johnson	—	160,304	50,008	210,312
Marineau	105,000	50,019	50,008	205,027
Tallett	47,500	99,897	50,008	197,405

	(1)
	~~(1)~~	Stock awards (including SEUs) are reported at the aggregate grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
	(2)	Option awards are reported at the aggregate grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(3)

All non-employee directors received a grant of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of ~~$50,018 (956~~$50,019 (1,064 shares) and options with a grant date fair value of ~~$49,873 (4,064~~$50,008 (4,389 options) on the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders ~~November 6, 2013.~~(November 11, 2015). The value of restricted stock awards is based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The estimated value of options is calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. For a description of the assumptions used to calculate the amounts, see Note 11 to the Company’s audited financial statements included in the The closing price of the common stock on November ~~6, 2013~~11, 2015 was ~~$52.32.~~

$47.01.

(4)

Included in this column: ~~Dr. Coleman~~Mr. Baer received 105% of ~~her~~his annual retainer in the form of SEUs with a grant date fair value of ~~$99,774;~~$99,755; Mr. Berg ~~and Ms. Tallett~~ received ~~52.5%~~105% of ~~their~~his annual retainer in the form of SEUs with a grant date fair value ~~totaling $49,913; and~~of $99,755; Mr. Johnson received 105% of his annual retainer in the form of SEUs with a grant date fair value of ~~$110,291.~~

$110,285. Ms. Tallett received 52.5% of her annual retainer in the form of SEUs with a grant date fair value of $49,878.

	(5)	~~Upon resignation, Mr. Craigie forfeited the 2014 grants of restricted stock and options.~~
	~~(6)~~	As of June 30, ~~2014~~2016 each director held outstanding equity awards as shown in the table below:

Name

Options

Restricted Stock

SEUs

Berg

12,164

1,988

3,918

Coleman

59,009

3,242

18,516

Frazier

65,009

2,616

—

Henry

55,394

2,616

1,993

Johnson

65,009

2,616

38,107

Marineau

58,025

2,616

4,886

Tallett

41,009

2,616

7,685

~~Table of Contents~~

Name	Options	Restricted Stock	SEUs
Baer	8,301	2,515	3,231
Berg	20,465	2,033	7,457
Coleman	48,080	2,033	22,398
Frazier	61,310	2,033	—
Henry	33,065	2,033	2,150
Johnson	61,310	2,033	47,564
Marineau	27,065	2,033	5,271
Tallett	49,310	2,033	12,173

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Under SEC regulations, ~~of the SEC,~~ persons who have power to vote or to dispose of shares of the Company, either alone or jointly with others, are deemed to be beneficial owners of such shares. Because the voting or dispositive power of certain stock listed in the following table is shared or held by different persons, in some cases the same securities are listed opposite more than one name in the table. The total number of the Company’s shares listed in the table (excluding stock options that are presently exercisable or will become exercisable prior to October 30, ~~2014)~~2016) after elimination of such duplication is ~~12,365,937~~14,601,200 shares of common stock (approximately ~~34%~~37% of the outstanding common stock) and ~~5,874,998~~4,864,134 shares of ~~class~~Class B common stock (approximately ~~76%~~92% of the outstanding ~~class~~Class B common stock).

Set forth below is information as of August 31, ~~2014~~2016 concerning security ownership by each person who is known to management to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, by each director and nominee for director, by each NEO and by the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group.

Common Stock Owned

Class B Common Stock Owned (1)

Name

Sole Voting
or
Investment
Power

Shared
Voting or
Investment
Power

% of
Class (2)

Sole Voting
or
Investment
Power

Shared
Voting or
Investment
Power

% of
Class
a.
Beneficial owners of more than 5%

Katherine C. Meredith (3)

c/o Chris Sidwell

1716 Locust Street

Des Moines, IA 50309-3023

7,203

92,412

5.63

1,874,707

92,412

25.55

E. T. Meredith, IV (3)

c/o Chris Sidwell

1716 Locust Street

Des Moines, IA 50309-3023

—

92,412

8.06

2,020,312

850,106

37.28

D. Mell Meredith Frazier, Director (3)(12)(15)

1716 Locust Street

Des Moines, IA 50309-3023

60,627

92,412

7.95

1,917,922

850,106

35.95

Anna K. Meredith Endowment Trust (5)

665 Locust Street

Des Moines, IA 50304

—

—

1.63

—

600,000

7.79

Royce & Associates, LLC (6)

745 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10151

1,824,620

—

5.01

—

—

—

BlackRock, Inc. (7)

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

5,572,771

—

15.30

—

—

—

Ariel Investments, LLC (8)

200 E. Randolph Drive, Suite 2900

Chicago, IL 60601

—

2,075,019

5.70

—

—

—

The Vanguard Group, Inc. (9)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

—

2,058,279

5.65

—

—

—
b.
Directors, not listed above, including nominees and executive officers

Donald A. Baer, Director Nominee

—

—

*

—

—

—

Donald C. Berg, Director (10)(11)

10,122

—

*

—

—

—

Joseph H. Ceryanec, Chief Financial Officer (12)(15)(16)

66,995

—

*

—

—

—

Mary Sue Coleman, Director (10)(11)

70,833

—

*

—

—

—

Thomas H. Harty, President-National Media Group (12)(13)(16)

162,174

—

*

—

—

—

Frederick B. Henry, Director (3)(10)(11)

68,571

118,844

1.51

—

366,821

4.76

Joel W Johnson, Director (10)(11)

104,763

—

*

—

—

—

Paul A. Karpowicz, President-Local Media Group (4)(12)(13)(16)

324,240

5,876

*

—

—

—

Table of Contents

Common Stock Owned

Class B Common Stock Owned (1)

Name

Sole Voting
or
Investment
Power

Shared
Voting or
Investment
Power

% of
Class (2)

Sole Voting
or
Investment
Power

Shared
Voting or
Investment
Power

% of
Class

Stephen M. Lacy, Director, Chairman/CEO (4)(12)(13)(15)

427,261

2,600

1.17

—

—

—

Philip A. Marineau, Director (3)(10)(11)

48,664

—

*

—

—

—

Elizabeth E. Tallett, Director (10)(11)

43,342

—

*

—

—

—

John S. Zieser, Chief Development Officer, General Counsel (12)(13)(15)(16)

111,605

19

*

—

—

—
c.
All directors and executive officers as a group (3)(4)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) [12 persons]

1,499,217

219,751

10.63

1,917,922

1,216,927

40.71

		Common Stock Owned			Class B Common Stock Owned (1)
	*Name*	Sole Voting or Investment Power	Shared Voting or Investment Power	% of Class (2)	Sole Voting or Investment Power	Shared Voting or Investment Power	% of Class
a.	Beneficial owners of more than 5%
	E. T. Meredith, IV (3) c/o Chris Sidwell 1716 Locust Street Des Moines, IA 50309-3023	—	689,612	8.34	2,035,841	550,826	48.96
	D. Mell Meredith Frazier, Director (3)(9)(12)(13) 1716 Locust Street Des Moines, IA 50309-3023	63,876	689,612	8.24	1,933,450	550,826	47.02
	BlackRock, Inc. (4) 40 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022	5,926,575	—	15.09	—	—	—
	Royce & Associates, LLC (5) 745 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10151	2,538,094	—	6.46	—	—	—
	The Vanguard Group, Inc. (6) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355	2,534,007	46,942	6.57	—	—	—
	Ariel Investments, LLC (7) 200 E. Randolph Drive, Suite 2900 Chicago, IL 60601	2,180,306	—	5.55	—	—	—
b.	Directors, not listed above, including nominees and executive officers			*			—
	Donald A. Baer, Director (8)(9)(12)	7,050	—	*	—	—	—
	Donald C. Berg, Director (8)(9)(12)	25,070	—	*	—	—	—
	Joseph H. Ceryanec, Chief Financial Officer (10)(13)	97,417	—	*	—	—	—
	Mary Sue Coleman, Director (8)(9)(12)	61,321	—	*	—	—	—
	Thomas H. Harty, President-National Media Group (10) (11)(12)(14)	205,086	—	*	—	—	—
	Frederick B. Henry, Director (8)(9)(12)	26,197	—	*	—	344,017	6.51
	Joel W. Johnson, Director (8)(9)(12)	115,330	—	*	—	—	—
	Paul A. Karpowicz, President-Local Media Group (10)(11) (12)(14)(15)	279,017	5,876	*	—	—	—
	Stephen M. Lacy, Director, Chairman/CEO (10)(11)(12) (13)(15)	272,396	2,600	*	—	—	—
	Philip A. Marineau, Director (3)(8)(9)(12)	34,724	—	*	—	—	—
	Elizabeth E. Tallett, Director (8)(9)(12)	60,209	—	*	—	—	—
	John S. Zieser, Chief Development Officer, General
	Counsel (10)(13)(15)	96,228	19	*	—	—	—
	All directors and executive officers as a group (3)(8)(9) (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) [13 persons]	1,343,921	698,107	12.40	1,933,450	894,843	53.54


*Less than 1%


(1)	Class B common stock is not transferable except to members of the family of the holder and certain other related entities. However, ~~class~~Class B common stock is convertible share for share at any time into fully transferable common stock without the payment of any consideration. Holders of common stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share of common stock owned on the record date. Holders of ~~class~~Class B common stock are entitled to cast ten votes for each share owned on the record date.
(2)	Shares listed in the table under “Common Stock Owned” do not include shares of common stock deemed to be owned by the shareholder as a result of the shareholder’s ownership of ~~class~~Class B common stock which is convertible share for share into common stock. However, the calculation of “% of Class” includes such shares deemed to be owned. If such shares were not included in the calculations, the common stock ownership percentages would be ~~less than 1%~~1.76% for ~~Katherine C. Meredith,~~ E. T. Meredith, ~~IV,~~IV; 1.92% for D. Mell Meredith Frazier; ~~0% for the Anna K. Meredith Endowment Trust; and less than 1% for Frederick B. Henry;~~ the other individuals’ ownership percentages would be unchanged and the ownership percentage in ~~(c)~~(b)All directors and executive officers as a group would be ~~4.76%~~5.2%.
(3)	Includes shares owned by various trusts. The inclusion of these shares is not to be taken as an admission by the named shareholder of beneficial ownership of these shares for any other purpose.
(4)	~~Includes shares beneficially owned by spouses and relatives living in the same household with the named individuals and/or shares owned by family partnerships.~~
~~(5)~~	This is a charitable trust. Bankers Trust Company as trustee votes the shares at the direction of the Endowment Board. The Endowment Board, composed of Bankers Trust Company, D. Mell Meredith Frazier, E. T. Meredith, IV, James Hubbell, III and John D. Bloodgood, acting by majority vote, has dispositive power over the shares.
~~(6)~~	Information as of December 31, ~~2013~~2015 based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC. Royce & Associates, Inc. (“Royce”) has sole dispositive and sole voting power over 1,824,620 shares of Common Stock. Royce serves as an investment adviser, and, for purposes of the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act may be deemed to beneficially own 1,824,620 shares of Common Stock.
~~(7)~~	~~Information as of December 31, 2013 based on Schedule 13G~~ filed with the SEC. BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) has sole dispositive and sole voting power over ~~5,572,771~~5,926,575 shares of Common Stock. BlackRock serves as a parent holding company, and, for purposes of the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act may be deemed to beneficially own ~~5,572,771~~5,926,575 shares of Common Stock.
~~(8)~~ (5)	Information as of December 31, ~~2013~~2015 based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC. ~~Ariel Investments, LLC~~Royce & Associates, Inc. (“~~Ariel”~~Royce”) has sole dispositive and sole voting power ~~with respect to 1,855,236 shares of Common Stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,075,109~~over 2,538,094 shares of Common Stock. ~~Ariel~~Royce serves as an investment adviser, and, for purposes of the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act may be deemed to beneficially own ~~2,075,109~~2,538,094 shares of Common Stock.
~~(9)~~ (6)	Information as of December 31, ~~2013~~2015 based on Schedule ~~13G~~13G/A filed with the SEC. The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) has sole voting power ~~with respect to 54,420 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 2,006,559 shares of Common Stock~~ and shared dispositive power with respect to ~~51,720~~46,942 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,534,007 shares of Common Stock. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (“VTFC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of ~~51,720~~44,842 shares ~~(.14%~~(.11%) of Common Stock as a result of its serving as an investment manager of collective trust accounts. VFTC directs the voting of these shares. Vanguard Investments Australia,

Table of Contents

	Ltd. (“VIA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of ~~2,700~~4,200 shares (.01%) of Common Stock as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. VIA directs the voting of these shares. Vanguard may be deemed to beneficially own ~~2,058,279~~2,580,949 shares of Common Stock.
~~(10)~~ (7)	Information as of December 31, 2015 based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC. Ariel Investments, LLC (“Ariel”) has sole dispositive and sole voting power with respect to 2,180,306 shares of Common Stock . Ariel serves as an investment adviser, and, for purposes of the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act may be deemed to beneficially own 2,180,306 shares of Common Stock.
(8)	Includes ~~common stock equivalents~~SEUs held by non-employee directors under the Meredith Corporation Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors as follows (rounded up to the nearest whole number): ~~Berg-3,918, Johnson-38,107, Coleman-18,516, Tallett-7,685, Marineau-4,886~~Baer-3,231, Berg-7,458, Coleman-22,398, Henry-2,150, Johnson-47,564, Marineau-5,271 and ~~Henry-1,993~~Tallett-12,173 for an aggregate total of ~~75,105.~~ 100,245.
~~(11)~~ (9)	Includes shares which are subject to presently exercisable stock options or options exercisable within 60 days following August 31, ~~2014~~2016 by non-employee directors as follows: ~~Berg-2,700,~~Baer-1,304, Berg-12,114, Coleman-33,729, Frazier and ~~Johnson-51,930~~Johnson-52,959 each, ~~Marineau-34,470, Henry-32,700, Coleman-45,930~~Henry-22,014, Marineau-18,714, and ~~Tallett-27,930~~Tallett-40,959 for an aggregate total of ~~247,590.~~ 234,752.
~~(12)~~ (10)	Includes ~~common stock equivalent units~~SEUs and/or ~~restricted stock units~~RSUs held by executive officers under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plans as follows: ~~Lacy-75,221, Zieser-67,936, Harty-8,350, Karpowicz-7,300~~Ceryanec-68,293, Harty-31,687, Karpowicz-29,000, Lacy-128,530, and ~~Ceryanec-38,465~~Zieser-93,488 for an aggregate total of ~~197,272.~~ 350,998.
~~(13)~~ (11)	Includes shares which are subject to presently exercisable stock options or options exercisable within 60 days following August 31, ~~2014~~2016 by executive officers under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plans as follows: ~~Lacy-279,333, Karpowicz-253,000, Zieser-20,000~~Harty-148,000, Karpowicz-164,000, and ~~Harty-91,000~~Lacy-120,000 for an aggregate total of ~~643,333.~~ 432,000.
~~(14)~~ (12)	Includes ~~890,923~~666,752 shares which are subject to presently exercisable stock options or options exercisable within 60 days following August 31, ~~2014~~2016 by the directors and executive officers as a group.
~~(15)~~ (13)	Includes shares held by Principal Life Insurance Company as trustee under the 401(k) Plan for the benefit of certain participants, which shares are voted by the trustee at the direction of individual Plan participants. Shares held by ~~directors and~~ executive officers are as follows: ~~Lacy-6,984, Meredith-1,422, Ceryanec-1,125~~Ceryanec-1,226, Frazier-1,601, Lacy-7,678, and ~~Zieser-42.~~ Zieser-45.
~~(16)~~ (14)	Includes shares held by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Stock Plan Services, as trustee under the Meredith Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 2002 for the benefit of certain officers, which shares are voted by the trustee at the direction of the individual plan participants. Shares held by directors and executive officers are as follows: ~~Ceryanec-2,487, Harty-2,688, Karpowicz-7,297~~Harty-2,610 and ~~Zieser-127.~~Karpowicz-8,775.
(15)	Includes shares beneficially owned by spouses and relatives living in the same household with the named individuals and/or shares owned by family partnerships.

~~Table of Contents~~

AUDIT COMMITTEE DISCLOSURE

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for the approval and pre-approval of the audit, audit-related fees, tax and all other services performed by ~~our~~the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the registered public accounting firm’s independence. Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will revise the list of general pre-approved services from time to time, based upon subsequent determinations. The Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to management. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit, audit-related fees and permitted non-audit services provided by KPMG in fiscal ~~2014.~~2016.

Service Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2016 was KPMG. Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The following table sets forth information regarding fees for professional services rendered by KPMG with respect to fiscal ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013.~~2015.

2014

2013

Audit Fees (1)

$
981,109

$
1,313,363

Audit-Related Fees (2)

92,210

46,300

Tax Fees (3)

123,460

157,062

All Other Fees (4)

1,650

1,650

Total Fees

$
1,198,429

$
1,518,375

	2016		2015
Audit Fees (1)	$	1,189,000	$	953,839
Audit-Related Fees (2)		32,000		251,658
Tax Fees (3)		48,557		158,209
All Other Fees (4)		1,650		1,650
Total Fees	$	1,271,207	$	1,365,356

(1)
	~~(1)~~	Represents fees for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2014~~2016 and June 30, ~~2013~~2015 and the review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements during such fiscal years.
(2)	~~(2)~~	~~Consists~~Current year consists of the fees for audits of financial statements of certain employee benefit plans. Fiscal 2015 consists of fees for audits of financial statements of certain employee benefit plans, ~~assistance to the Internal Audit Department and~~ the review of certain ~~contracts.~~contracts, and an IT Security review.
(3)	~~(3)~~	Consists of fees for tax services provided to the Company, including tax planning services and the review of certain tax returns.
(4)	~~(4)~~	Consists of fees for access to KPMG’s Internet Accounting Research web site.

Table of Contents

The Audit Committee has advised the Company that it has determined that the non-audit services rendered by KPMG during the Company’s most recent fiscal year are compatible with maintaining the independence of such registered public accounting firm.

Report of the Audit Committee

The responsibilities of the Audit Committee, which are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter adopted by the Board, ~~of Directors,~~ include providing oversight of the Company’s financial reporting process through periodic meetings with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors and management to review accounting, auditing, internal controls and financial reporting matters. Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the financial reporting information and related systems of internal controls. The Audit Committee, in carrying out its role, relies on the Company’s senior management, including senior financial management, and its independent registered public accounting firm.

We have reviewed and discussed with senior management the Company’s audited financial statements included in the ~~2014~~2016 Annual Report to Shareholders. Management has confirmed to us that such financial statements:

	1.
	1.	Have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and are the responsibility of ~~management~~management; and

	2.	Have been prepared in conformity with GAAP.

~~Table of Contents~~

We have discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, ~~(Communications~~Communications with Audit ~~Committees) (AS16)~~Committees (“AS16”). AS16 requires our independent registered public accounting firm to provide us with additional information regarding the scope and results of its audit of the Company’s financial statements, including with respect to:

	1.
	1.	Their responsibility under ~~generally accepted auditing standards,~~ GAAP;

	2.	Significant accounting ~~policies,~~ policies;

	3.	Management judgment and ~~estimates,~~ estimates;

	4.	Any significant audit ~~adjustments,~~ adjustments;

	5.	Any disagreements with ~~management,~~management; and

	6.	Any difficulties encountered in performing the audit.

We have received from KPMG a letter providing the disclosures required by Public Company Oversight Board Rule 3526, Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, with respect to any relationships between KPMG and the Company that, in its professional judgment, may reasonably be thought to bear upon independence. KPMG has discussed its independence with us, and has confirmed in such letter that, in its professional judgment, it is independent of the Company within the meaning of the federal securities laws.

The Audit Committee also reviewed management’s process designed to achieve compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, KPMG audited management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting and has issued a report thereon dated August ~~25, 2014.~~26, 2016. In that report KPMG states that, in its opinion, the Company maintained effective control over financial reporting as of June 30, ~~2014.~~2016.

As specified in the Audit Committee Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements are complete and accurate and in accordance with GAAP. That is the responsibility of management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In giving our recommendation to the Board, ~~of Directors,~~ we have relied on:

	1.
	1.	Management’s representation that such financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with ~~GAAP~~GAAP; and

	2.	The report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with respect to such financial statements.

Table of Contents

Based upon the review and discussions described above with respect to the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s ~~2014~~2016 Annual Report to Shareholders, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that such financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on ~~Form 10-K~~ for filing with the SEC.

	AUDIT COMMITTEE
	~~AUDIT COMMITTEE~~
	Philip A. Marineau, ~~Chair~~ Chairman
	Mary Sue Coleman
	Donald C. Berg
	Donald A. Baer

PROPOSAL THREE ~~- APPROVAL OF 2014 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN~~

On August 13, 2014, our Board of Directors approved, subject to shareholder approval, the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). We are submitting the Plan to our shareholders for approval, which is required under the terms of the Plan for awards granted under it to be valid and effective. We are also seeking shareholder approval in accordance with the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange rules and in order for certain awards under the Plan to qualify as “performance-based compensation” that is exempt from the $1 million deduction limit imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

We believe that appropriate equity incentives are important to attract and retain the highest caliber of employees and directors, to link incentive rewards to Company performance, to encourage employee and director ownership in our company, and to align the interests of our employees and directors to those of our shareholders. The approval of the Plan will enable us to continue to provide such incentives.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Description of the Plan.~~

The following is a summary of the material features of the Plan. The following summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the terms of the Plan, which is attached to this proxy statement as Exhibit A.

~~Purpose of the Plan~~. The purpose of the Plan is to establish a program of incentives for officers, key employees, and directors of the Company which will (a) stimulate, recognize, and reward the contribution of those persons to the achievement of long-range corporate goals, (b) provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract and retain the services of those persons possessing a high level of managerial ability and experience upon whose judgment, interest and special effort the successful conduct of its operation is largely dependent, and (c) to align the interests of those persons with those of the Company’s shareholders.

~~Shares Subject to Plan~~. The number of shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, of the Company reserved for issuance under the Plan is three million (3,000,000) shares plus the aggregate number of shares available for issuance (and not subject to outstanding awards) under the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan as of the date on which the Plan is approved by the Company’s shareholders. As of June 30, 2014, there were 5,300,439 shares available for issuance (and not subject to outstanding awards) under the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.

The number of shares reserved for issuance will be adjusted upon a merger, reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend or other change in the corporate structure of the Company affecting the common stock. The maximum number of options or stock appreciation shares, in the aggregate, that may be awarded to a participant during any annual period is 750,000 shares. The maximum number of shares, in the aggregate, that may be awarded to any participant as restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock equivalent units, or performance shares in any annual period is 300,000 shares.

If any award granted under the Plan terminates, expires, or lapses prior to exercise for any reason, or if shares are issued and then reacquired by the Company, any shares subject to such award or any reacquired shares shall be available for the grant of a new award under the Plan. Shares covered by an award shall not be counted as used unless and until they are actually issued and delivered to a participant. Any shares covered by a stock appreciation right shall be counted as used only to the extent shares are actually issued to the participant upon exercise of the right. In addition, any shares of common stock exchanged by an optionee as full or partial payment to the Company of the exercise price under any stock option exercised under the Plan, any shares retained by the Company pursuant to a participant’s tax withholding election, and any shares covered by a benefit which is settled in cash shall be added to the shares available for benefits under the Plan.

~~Administration~~. The Plan provides for administration by a committee of the Board of Directors consisting of two or more directors who qualify as non-employee directors. The Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Among the powers granted to the committee are the authority to interpret the Plan; establish rules and regulations for its operation; select persons to receive awards; determine the size and types of awards; and determine the terms and conditions of such awards. Subject to certain conditions, the committee also has the power to amend the terms and conditions of any outstanding award.

~~Eligibility and Selection of Participants~~. All key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and all non-employee directors of the Company are eligible to participate in this Plan. The selection of participants from eligible employees is within the discretion of the committee. The estimated number of persons who are eligible to participate in the Plan at this time is 800.

~~Awards under the Plan~~. In structuring the Plan, the Board of Directors sought to provide for a variety of awards that could be flexibly administered in order to carry out the purposes of the Plan. Accordingly, the Plan provides for the grant of any or all of the following types of awards: stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock equivalent units, performance shares, and performance cash awards. The committee shall determine the nature and amount of each award.

~~Stock Options~~~~. The Plan authorizes the committee to grant incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, or a combination thereof to purchase common stock.~~

Subject to the limitations on the number of options that may be granted under the Plan, the committee shall determine for each option its duration, the terms and conditions to which the exercise of the option is subject, the number of shares that may be purchased, and the purchase price per share upon exercise of the option. The purchase price per share may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of such share on the date the option is granted, and no option may be exercised later than the tenth anniversary date of its grant. If an option other than an incentive stock option may not be exercised due to a black-out period

~~Table of Contents~~

within the three business days prior to the normal expiration date of the option, then the expiration date of such option shall be extended for a period of 30 days following the end of the black-out period or such longer period as permitted by the committee.

The option price upon exercise may be paid in full either: (a) in cash or its equivalent; (b) by tender of previously acquired shares; (c) by a certification of ownership of such previously-acquired shares; (d) to the extent permitted by law, by delivery of a properly executed exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly deliver to the Company the amount of sale proceeds from the option shares or loan proceeds to pay the exercise price and applicable withholding taxes due to the Company; (e) by having the Company retain from the option shares a number of shares of common stock having a value, determined pursuant to rules established by the committee in its discretion, equal to the option price; or (f) such other methods of payment as the committee deems appropriate. In no event shall the committee, (1) without shareholder approval, cancel any outstanding stock option for the purpose of reissuing the option to the participant at a lower exercise price or reduce the option price of an outstanding option, or (2) cancel any outstanding stock option with an exercise price greater than the then current fair market value of the common stock for the purpose of cashing out a stock option unless such cash-out occurs in conjunction with a change in control.

~~Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs).~~ The Plan authorizes the committee to grant SARs, each of which would the participant to payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the exercise date of the SAR over the fair market value on the date of the grant. Payment of the SAR shall be in cash or common stock as set forth in the award. Each SAR grant will be subject to the terms and conditions the committee may impose, but no SAR may be exercised later than the tenth anniversary date of its grant. If an SAR may not be exercised due to a black-out period within the three business days prior to the normal expiration date of the SAR, then the expiration date of such SAR shall be extended for a period of 30 days following the end of the black-out period or such longer period as permitted by the committee. In no event shall the committee, (a) without shareholder approval, cancel any outstanding SAR for the purpose of reissuing the SAR to the participant at a lower exercise price or reduce the option price of an outstanding SAR, or (b) cancel any outstanding SAR with an exercise price greater than the then current fair market value of the common stock for the purpose of cashing out an SAR unless such cash-out occurs in conjunction with a change in control. The committee also may, in its sole discretion, substitute SARs which can be settled only in stock for outstanding stock options.

~~Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, and Stock Equivalent Units~~. The Plan authorizes the committee to grant awards in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, or stock equivalent units. The committee may award or sell shares of restricted stock to participants subject to such terms, conditions, restrictions, and/or limitations, if any, as the committee deems appropriate, subject to the limitations on the number of shares of restricted stock that may be granted under the Plan.

Restricted stock units and stock equivalent units provide participants the right to receive shares of common stock at a future date subject to such terms and conditions as the committee determines appropriate, including, without limitation, restrictions on the sale or other disposition of the units, forfeiture of the units upon termination of the participant’s employment or service as a director within specified periods, and the attainment of performance goals.

~~Performance Shares~~. The Plan authorizes the committee to grant performance shares to participants subject to such terms and conditions as the committee deems appropriate. Performance shares may be earned in whole or in part if certain goals established by the committee are achieved over a period of time designated by the committee.

~~Performance Cash Awards~~. The committee may designate the participants to whom cash incentives based on performance (“performance cash awards”) are to be awarded and determine the amount of the award and the terms and conditions of each such award. Each performance cash award shall entitle the participant to a payment in cash upon the attainment of one or more performance goals and other terms and conditions specified by the committee. Performance cash awards may include, without limitation, special long-term incentive plans or other incentive programs based upon performance contained in employment agreements between a participant and the Company.

Notwithstanding the satisfaction of any performance goals, the amount to be paid under a performance cash award may be adjusted by the committee on the basis of such further consideration as the committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine. However, the committee may not, in any event, increase the amount earned under a performance cash award upon satisfaction of any performance goal by any participant who is either the Chief Executive Officer or one of the named executive officers (“Covered Employee”) and the maximum amount earned under such an award by a Covered Employee in any fiscal year may not exceed $7,500,000. The committee may, in its discretion, substitute actual shares of common stock for the cash payment otherwise required to be made to a participant pursuant to a performance cash award.

~~Performance Goals~~.Awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock equivalent units, performance shares, and performance cash awards may be made subject to the attainment of performance goals determined by reference to or based upon one or more business criteria within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, including the following goals: cash flow; cost;

~~Table of Contents~~

ratio of debt to debt plus equity; profit before tax; economic profit; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization; earnings per share; operating earnings; economic value added; ratio of operating earnings to capital spending; free cash flow; net profit; net sales; sales growth; price of the Company’s common stock; return on net assets, equity or stockholders’ equity; return on invested capital; market share; or total return to stockholders (“performance criteria”). Any performance criteria may be measured, as applicable, (i) in absolute terms, (ii) in relative terms (including without limitation by the passage of time and/or against another company or companies), (iii) on a per-share basis, (iv) against the performance of the Company as a whole or a segment of the Company, (v) on a pre-tax or after-tax basis, and/or (vi) on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis. Measurement of the attainment of performance criteria may include or exclude, as specified by the committee in an award agreement, impact of charges for restructuring, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and other unusual or non-recurring items, and the cumulative effects of tax or accounting changes, each as identified in the financial statements, in the Company’s accounting records, in the notes to the financial statements, in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the annual report on Form 10-K, or in other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. However, unless the committee determines otherwise prior to the end of the applicable time for establishing metrics for an award, to the extent any item referenced in the preceding sentence affects any metric applicable to an award, such item shall be automatically excluded or included in determining the extent to which the metrics have been achieved depending on which produces the higher award (subject to any exercise of “negative discretion” by the committee).

~~Tax Deduction Limit (Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code).~~ Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of certain items of compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and to each of the named executive officers to $1,000,000 annually. The limitation on deductions does not apply to certain types of compensation, including qualified performance-based compensation. The Company believes that benefits in the form of stock options, SARs, performance shares, and performance cash awards under the Plan constitute qualified performance-based compensation and, as such, will be exempt from the $1,000,000 limitation on deductible compensation. It is intended that the disclosures set forth above with respect to (i) the business criteria (set forth under “Performance Goals” on which performance cash awards are payable under the Plan), (ii) individuals eligible to receive compensation under the Plan, and (iii) the maximum amounts of compensation payable under the Plan will satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, assuming shareholder approval of the Plan is obtained. Other awards under the Plan, such as non-performance-based restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock equivalent units, generally will not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code; thus, compensation paid to certain named executive officers in connection with such awards would be subject to the $1,000,000 limitation on deductible compensation. The committee generally attempts to maximize the tax deductibility of compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, but reserves the right to provide for compensation to such individuals that may not be deductible.

~~Other Terms of Awards~~. No awards granted under the Plan shall be transferable, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Further, all options and SARs granted to a participant under the Plan shall be exercisable during the participant’s lifetime only by such participant. The committee, at the time of granting an award, shall determine what effect the death, disability, retirement, or other termination of employment will have on the ability of the participant to exercise or retain the benefits of such award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the committee, in its discretion, may permit the transferability of any award under the Plan to members of the participant’s immediate family or trusts or family partnerships for the benefit of such persons, subject to terms and conditions imposed by the committee. The exercise price of any award granted under the Plan may not be “repriced” or reduced after the date it is granted, and no award may be canceled for the purpose of granting a new award at a lower exercise price, without shareholder approval. In addition, any cash or equity-based incentive compensation paid to a participant under the Plan shall be subject to policies established and amended from time to time by the committee regarding the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation.

~~No Shareholder Rights~~. ~~No participant who receives an option shall have the right of a shareholder of the Company until such participant actually acquires shares of common stock upon the exercise of an option.~~

~~Change of Control~~. Immediately upon a change of control of the Company (as defined in the Plan), all outstanding stock option and stock appreciation rights will become exercisable; all restrictions on restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock equivalent units will lapse; and all performance awards will be delivered as if the performance goals had been met.

~~Duration of Plan, Amendment, and Termination~~. The Plan will continue until all shares subject to the Plan have been purchased or acquired. No award may be granted on or after November 12, 2024. The Board may amend the Plan from time to time or terminate the Plan; however, no amendment may be made without shareholder approval, if such approval is required by law, regulation, or stock exchange rule.

~~Federal Income Tax Treatment~~~~. Under current U.S. federal tax law, the following are the income tax consequences generally arising with respect to awards under the Plan.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

A participant who is granted an incentive stock option will not realize any taxable income at the time of the grant or at the time of exercise. Similarly, the Company will not be entitled to any deduction at the time of grant or at the time of exercise. However, the appreciation in value of the stock subject to an incentive stock option will be included in alternative minimum taxable income in the year of exercise. If the participant makes no disposition of shares acquired pursuant to an incentive stock option within two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise, any gain realized on a subsequent disposition of the shares will be treated as long-term capital gain. Under such circumstances, the Company will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes. If the participant does not hold the shares for the required periods, the participant will recognize ordinary income for the year in which the disposition occurs in the amount (if any) by which the lesser of the fair market value of such shares on the date of the exercise of the option or the amount realized from the sale exceeds the option price and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

A participant who is granted a nonqualified stock option will not have taxable income at the time of grant, but will have taxable income at the time of exercise equal to the difference between the option price and the market value of the shares on the date of exercise. The Company is entitled to a corresponding deduction.

The grant of a SAR will produce no tax consequences for the participant or the Company. The exercise of a SAR will result in taxable income to the participant, equal to the amount of cash paid to the participant or the fair market value of the shares delivered, as the case may be, and a corresponding deduction to the Company.

A participant who has been granted an award of restricted shares of common stock or restricted stock units will not realize taxable income at the time of the grant, and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time, unless the participant makes an election to be taxed at the time of the grant. When the restrictions lapse, the participant will recognize taxable income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for such shares. The Company will be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction.

A participant who has been granted an award of stock equivalent units will not realize taxable income at the time of the grant, and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. When the stock equivalent units are converted to common stock, the participant will recognize taxable income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for the units. The Company will be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction.

A participant who has been granted an award of performance shares of common stock will not realize taxable income at the time of the grant, and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. The participant will recognize taxable income in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares received by the participant upon achievement of the performance goals. The Company will be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction.

~~Other Information.~~ As the administration of the Plan involves discretionary choices by the committee, awards to be granted under the Plan in fiscal 2015 are not now determinable. Awards granted under the Company’s predecessor plan in fiscal 2014 are disclosed under the heading “Named Executive Officer Compensation” beginning on page 21 in this Proxy Statement.

Approval of the Plan requires approval by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast that are represented by shares present in person or by proxy, a quorum being present, voting on this proposal at the annual meeting of shareholders.

~~The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR approval of the Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. Unless specified otherwise, the accompanying proxy will be voted FOR the Plan.~~

~~PROPOSAL FOUR~~ - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, ~~2015.~~2017. Services provided to the Company and its subsidiaries by KPMG in fiscal ~~year 2014~~2016 are described under“Service Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

We are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm. Although ratification is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of KPMG to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance.

~~Table of Contents~~

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to ratify the selection of KPMG. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal ~~2015.~~2017.

In the event shareholders do not ratify the appointment, the appointment will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and ~~our~~its shareholders.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s common stock that may be issued under all equity compensation plans of the Company in existence as of June 30, ~~2014.~~2016. All of the equity compensation plans for which information is included in the following table have been approved by shareholders.

Plan Category

(a)
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

(b)
Weighted average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

(c)
Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

3,877,800

$40.26

5,300,439
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

None

N/A

None
Total

3,877,800

$40.26

5,300,439

Plan Category	(a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	(b) Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	(c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders	2,414,436	$42.12	8,721,345
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders	None	N/A	None
Total	2,414,436	$42.12	8,721,345

Table of Contents

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act requires that certain of the Company’s officers and directors and persons who own more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding stock file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and NYSE. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely upon a review of copies of forms submitted to the Company during and with respect to the most recent fiscal year and on written representations from the Company’s directors and officers, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with during the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2014, except for reporting~~2016, with exception of one ~~transaction under Director Philip A. Marineau’s 10b5-1 plan, which was inadvertently omitted, but later reflected on an amendment to his filed~~ Form 4 ~~dated May 2, 2014.~~filing for each of Stephen M. Lacy, Joseph Ceryanec, Thomas Harty, Paul Karpowicz and John S. Zieser, which were inadvertently filed one day late.

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTION POLICY AND PROCEDURES

The Company has established written policies and procedures (“Related Person Transaction Policy” or the “Policy”) to assist it in reviewing transactions in excess of $120,000 (“Transactions”) involving Meredith and its subsidiaries and Related Persons (as defined below). This Policy supplements the Company’s other conflict of interest policies set forth in the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and its other internal procedures. A summary description of the Related Person Transaction Policy is set forth below.

The objective of the Board in adopting this Policy is to assure that transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries and these persons are conducted in a manner that is fair to the Company and its shareholders and result in terms that are no more or less favorable to the Company than transactions between it and unaffiliated persons negotiating on an arm’s-length basis.

For purposes of the Policy, a Related Person includes the Company’s directors, director nominees and executive officers since the beginning of the Company’s last fiscal year, beneficial owners of 5% or more of any class of the Company’s voting securities (“5% Holder”) and members of their respective Immediate Family (as defined in the Policy).

~~Table of Contents~~

The Policy provides that any proposed Transaction is to be promptly reported to the Company’s General Counsel and ~~Chief Financial Officer.~~CFO. The ~~Chief Financial Officer~~CFO will assist in gathering information about the Transaction and present the information to the Audit Committee, which is responsible for reviewing the Transaction. The Audit Committee will determine if the Transaction is a Related Person Transaction and approve, ratify or reject the Related Person Transaction. In approving, ratifying or rejecting a Related Person Transaction, the Committee will consider such information as it deems important to conclude ifwhether the Transaction is fair to the Company.

The Company had no reportable Related Person Transactions in fiscal ~~2014.~~2016.

ANNUAL REPORT AND ADDITIONAL MATERIALS

~~Our 2014~~

The Company is distributing its 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders ~~is being distributed~~ with this Proxy Statement. Copies of ~~our Annual Report on Form 10-K for~~ the ~~year ended June 30, 2014,~~Company’s may be obtained without charge upon written or oral request to Secretary, Meredith Corporation, 1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3023, (515) ~~284-2786. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K~~284-3000. The is also available free of charge onwww.meredith.com,, along with ~~our~~ Quarterly Reports on ~~Form 10-Q,~~ Current Reports on ~~Form 8-K~~ and any amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries, such as brokers, to satisfy the delivery requirements for Proxy Statements and Annual Reports with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Proxy Statement addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies.

This year a number of brokers with account holders who are the Company’s shareholders may be householding the Company’s proxy materials. A single Proxy Statement may be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once a shareholder has received notice from a shareholder’s broker that it will be householding communications to a shareholder’s address, householding will continue until a shareholder is notified otherwise or until a shareholder revokes ~~his or her~~ consent. If at any time a shareholder no longer wishes to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate Proxy Statement and Annual Report, the shareholder should notify his or her broker directly or direct

Table of Contents

his or her written request to Secretary, Meredith Corporation, 1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3023. Shareholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Proxy Statement at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their broker.

How to Receive Future Proxy Statements and Annual Reports Online

To ensure receipt of future Meredith Proxy Statements and Annual Reports over the Internet instead of receiving paper copies in the mail, registered shareholders may elect electronic delivery of all future proxy materials and other shareholder communications simply by updating their shareholder account information either by telephone at (877) 847-4696 or via Internet at www.proxypush.com/mdp.

If you hold your shares in broker or other nominee name and are not given an opportunity to consent to electronic delivery when you vote your shares online, you may contact the holder of record through which you hold your shares and ask about the availability of Internet delivery.

If you do consent to Internet delivery, a notation will be made in your account. When future Proxy Statements and Annual Reports become available, you will receive an e-mail notice instructing you how to access them over the Internet.

SUBMITTING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Any shareholder wishing to include a proposal in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of proxy for the ~~2015~~2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit the proposal so that it is received by the Company no later than May 29, ~~2015.~~2017. The proposal should be addressed to Secretary, Meredith Corporation, 1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3023.

Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, any shareholder wishing to bring a proposal before the ~~2015~~2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (but whose proposal will not be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement), must deliver written notice of such proposal in accordance with the requirements of the Bylaws to the Secretary of the Company at the address specified above no earlier than

~~Table of Contents~~

the close of business on the ~~120th~~120th day or later than the close of business on the ~~90th~~90th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s Annual Meeting. For ~~2015,~~2017, such proposal must be received no earlier than the close of business on July ~~15, 2015~~12, 2017 and no later than the close of business on August ~~14, 2015~~11, 2017 and otherwise comply with the requirements of the Bylaws. If the date of the ~~2015~~2017 meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or postponed by more than 60 days from the first anniversary of the ~~2014~~2016 Annual Meeting different deadlines will apply.

Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, any shareholder wishing to propose a nominee for the Board ~~of Directors~~ must deliver written notice of such proposed nominee to the Secretary of the Company at the address specified above no earlier than the close of business on the ~~120th~~120th day or later than the close of business on the ~~90th~~90th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s Annual Meeting. For ~~2015,~~2017, written notice of such proposed nominee must be received no earlier than the close of business on July ~~15, 2015~~12, 2017 and no later than the close of business on August ~~14, 2015~~11, 2017 and otherwise comply with the requirements of the Bylaws. If the date of the ~~2015~~2017 Annual Meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or postponed by more than 60 days from the first anniversary of the ~~2014~~2016 Annual Meeting different deadlines will apply.

Table of Contents

~~EXHIBIT A~~Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

~~MEREDITH CORPORATION~~
~~2014 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN~~

1.~~Purpose~~.Special Items - The ~~purpose~~following tables show results of operations excluding special items and as reported with the difference being the special items. While these adjusted results are not a substitute for reported results under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), management believes this information is useful as an aid in further understanding Meredith’s current performance, performance trends and financial condition. These tables provide reconciliations of the Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to establish a program of incentives for officers, key employees, and directors of Meredith Corporation (the “Company”) which will (a) stimulate, recognize, and rewardfinancial measures that are not in accordance with GAAP, or non-GAAP financial measures, used in the ~~contribution of those persons to achievement of long-range corporate goals, (b) provide flexibility~~Proxy Statement to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of those persons possessing a high level of managerial ability and experience upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of its operation largely is dependent, and (c) align the personal interests of those persons with those of the Company’s stockholders.most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

2.~~Administration~~. The Plan will be administered by a committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), consisting of two or more directors as the Board may designate from time to time, each of whom shall satisfy such requirements as:


Twelve months ended June 30,	2016			2015
(In thousands except per share data)
Operating profit excluding special items (non-GAAP)	$	261,262		$	262,842
Special items
Write-down of impaired assets		(161,462	)		(2,951	)
Merger termination fee net of merger-related costs		43,541			—
Severance and related benefits costs		(9,793	)		(14,670	)
Pension settlement charge		(5,586	)		—
Acquisition and disposal transaction costs		—			(2,848	)
Reversal of previously accrued restructuring costs		3,248			—
Other		(601	)		(261	)
Total special items		(130,653	)		(20,730	)
Operating profit	$	130,609		$	242,112

Earnings per share excluding special items (non-GAAP)	$	3.30		$	3.30
Per share impact of special items		(2.55	)		(0.28	)
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.75		$	3.02

Twelve months ended June 30,	2016			2015			Percentage Change
(In thousands)
National media operating profit excluding special items (non-GAAP)	$	150,169		$	136,860			10	%
National media special items
Write-down of impaired assets		(155,823	)		(1,692	)
Severance and related benefit costs		(9,301	)		(11,853	)
Pension settlement charge		(3,294	)		—
Acquisition transaction costs		—			(564	)
Reversal of previously accrued restructuring costs		1,157			—
Other		(601	)		(70	)
Total national media special items		(167,862	)		(14,179	)
National media operating profit (loss)	$	(17,693	)	$	122,681			n/m

n/m - Not meaningful

(a) the Securities and Exchange Commission may establish for administrators acting under plans intended to qualify for exemption under Rule 16b-3 or its successor under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”);

~~(b) the New York Stock Exchange may establish pursuant to its rule-making authority; and~~

(c) the Internal Revenue Service may establish for outside directors acting under plans intended to qualify for exemption under Section 162(m) (“Code section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

The Committee shall have full power to select individuals to whom awards are granted; to determine the size and types of awards and their terms and conditions; to construe and interpret the Plan; to establish and amend the rules for the Plan administration; and to make all other determinations which may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. All determinations of the Committee shall be final and conclusive on all persons, including the Company, its stockholders and participants, and their estates and beneficiaries. The Committee may authorize one or more officers of the Company to select employees to participate in the Plan and to determine the number of option shares and other rights to be granted to such participants, except with respect to awards to officers subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or officers who are or who are reasonably expected to be “covered employees” within the meaning of Code section 162(m) (“Covered Employees”) and any reference in the Plan to the Committee shall include such officer or officers.

3.~~Reserved Shares~~. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 13 herein, the number of shares of Common Stock of the Company reserved for issuance under the Plan shall be three million (3,000,000) shares plus the aggregate number of shares available for issuance (and not subject to outstanding awards) under the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan as of the date on which the Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders. All of these shares may be either authorized but unissued or reacquired shares.

If any award granted under this Plan terminates, expires, or lapses prior to exercise for any reason, or if shares are issued under the Plan and reacquired by the Company, any shares subject to such award or any reacquired shares shall be available for the grant of a new award under the Plan. Shares covered by a benefit granted under the Plan shall not be counted as used unless and until they are actually issued and delivered to a participant. Any shares covered by a stock appreciation right shall be counted as used only to the extent shares are actually issued to the participant upon exercise of the right. In addition, any shares of Common Stock exchanged by an optionee as full or partial payment to the Company of the exercise price under any stock option exercised under the Plan, any shares retained by the Company pursuant to a participant’s tax withholding election, and any shares covered by a benefit which is settled in cash shall be added to the shares available for benefits under the Plan.

Additionally, in the event that a corporation acquired by (or combined with) the Company has shares available under a pre-existing plan approved by stockholders and not adopted in contemplation of such acquisition or combination, the shares available for grant pursuant to the terms of such pre-existing plan (as adjusted, to the extent appropriate, using the exchange ratio or other adjustment or valuation ratio or formula used in such acquisition or combination to determine the consideration payable to the holders of common stock of the entities party to such acquisition or combination) may be used for awards under the Plan and shall not reduce the shares of Common Stock authorized for grant under the Plan; provided that awards using such available shares shall not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the terms of the pre-existing plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and shall only be made to individuals who were not employees or directors of the Company prior to such acquisition or combination.

Appendix

Table of Contents

All of the Plan shares may, but need not, be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options. The maximum number of option or stock appreciation shares that may be awarded to any participant (including without limitation any non-employee director) during any annual period during the term of the Plan is seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) shares in the aggregate. The maximum number of shares that may be awarded to any participant (including without limitation any non-employee director) during any annual period during the term of the Plan as restricted stock, restricted stock units, or performance shares is three hundred thousand (300,000) shares in the aggregate.

4.~~Eligibility. All key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and all non-employee directors of the Company shall be eligible to participate in this Plan.~~

5.~~Types of Awards~~. Awards under the Plan may be granted in any one or a combination of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock equivalent units, performance shares, and performance cash awards.

Certain awards under the Plan may constitute nonqualified deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code (“Code section 409A”), including the regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder, and it is intended that such awards meet the requirements of paragraphs (a)(2), (3), and (4) of Code section 409A, and the terms and provisions of the Plan and award documents should be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with such requirements.

6.~~Stock Options~~. Stock options may be granted to participants at any time as determined by the Committee. The Committee shall determine the number of shares subject to each option and whether the option is an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code. The option price for each option shall be determined by the Committee but shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted. Each option shall expire at such time as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant; provided, however, that no option shall be exercisable later than the tenth (10th) anniversary date of its grant. Options granted under the Plan shall be exercisable at such time and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant; provided, however, that if an option other than an incentive stock option may not be exercised due to a Black-Out Period (defined as any period of time when, pursuant to any policies of the Company, any securities of the Company may not be traded by certain persons as designated by the Company) within the three business days prior to the normal expiration date of such option, then the expiration date of such option shall be extended for a period of 30 days following the end of the Black-Out Period or such longer period as permitted by the Committee). The option price upon exercise of any option shall be payable to the Company in full either (i) in cash or its equivalent; (ii) by tendering previously acquired shares having a fair market value at the time of exercise equal to the option price; (iii) by a certification of ownership of such previously-acquired shares; (iv) to the extent permitted by law, by delivery of a properly executed exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly deliver to the Company the amount of sale proceeds from the option shares or loan proceeds to pay the exercise price and applicable withholding taxes due to the Company; (v) having the Company retain from the option shares a number of shares of Common Stock having a value (determined pursuant to rules established by the Committee in its discretion) equal to the option price; or (vi) such other methods of payment as the Committee, at its discretion, deems appropriate.

In no event shall the Committee, (1) without shareholder approval, cancel any outstanding stock option for the purpose of reissuing the option to the participant at a lower exercise price, or reduce the option price of an outstanding option; or (2) cancel any outstanding stock option with an exercise price greater than the then current fair market value of the Common Stock for the purpose of cashing out a stock option unless such cash-out occurs in conjunction with a change in control. Reload stock options are not permitted.

7.~~Stock Appreciation Rights.~~ Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) may be granted to participants at any time as determined by the Committee. The Committee also may, in its sole discretion, substitute SARs that can be settled only in stock for outstanding stock options. The grant price of a substitute SAR shall be equal to the option price of the related option; otherwise, the grant price of an SAR shall be equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of its grant. SARs may be exercised upon such terms and conditions and for the term as the Committee, in its sole discretion, determines; provided, however, that (a) the term shall not exceed the option term in the case of a substitute SAR or ten years in the case of any other SARs, and the terms and conditions applicable to a substitute SAR shall be substantially the same as those applicable to the stock option which it replaces; and (b) if an SAR may not be exercised due to a Black-Out Period (defined as above) within the three business days prior to the normal expiration date of such SAR, then the expiration date of such SAR shall be extended for a period of 30 days following the end of the Black-Out Period or such longer period as permitted by the Committee). Upon exercise of SARs, the participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying the excess of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the grant price of the SARs by the number of shares with respect to which the SARs are exercised. The payment may be made in cash or stock, as determined by the Committee at the time of grant, except in the case of a substitute SAR that may be made only in stock.

~~Table of Contents~~

In no event shall the Committee, (1) without shareholder approval, cancel any outstanding SAR for the purpose of reissuing the SAR to the participant at a lower exercise price, or reduce the option price of an outstanding SAR, or (2) cancel any outstanding SAR with an exercise price greater than the then current fair market value of the Common Stock for the purpose of cashing out an SAR unless such cash-out occurs in conjunction with a change in control.

8.~~Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, and Stock Equivalent Units.~~ The Committee may award or sell shares of restricted stock to participants subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee determines appropriate, including, without limitation, restrictions on the sale or other disposition of shares, rights of the Company to reacquire such shares upon termination of the participant’s employment within specified periods, and the attainment of performance goals. Each participant who has been awarded or purchases shares of restricted stock shall have such rights of a stockholder with respect to such shares as the Committee may designate at the time of the award, including the right to vote such shares and the right to receive dividends paid on such shares. Any dividends or distributions paid in shares of Common Stock with respect to restricted stock shall be subject to the same restrictions, terms, and conditions as the shares of restricted stock with respect to which they are paid.

Restricted stock units and stock equivalent units provide the participant the right to receive shares of Common Stock at a future date subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee determines appropriate, including, without limitation, restrictions on the sale or other disposition of the units, forfeiture of the units upon termination of the participant’s employment or service as a director within specified periods, and the attainment of performance goals. Each participant who has been awarded restricted stock units or stock equivalent units shall have no rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares subject to the units until shares are actually issued to the participant. The Committee may, in its discretion, include the right to receive dividend equivalents in connection with such restricted stock units or stock equivalent units.

The holder may, with the consent of the Committee, timely elect under the provisions of Code section 409A to convert any outstanding shares of restricted stock into common stock equivalents effective on the originally scheduled vesting date of such restricted stock.

9.~~Performance Shares~~. The Committee may award performance shares to participants subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee determines appropriate. Performance shares may be earned in whole or in part if one or more performance goals are achieved over a period of time designated by the Committee.

Notwithstanding satisfaction of any performance goals, the number of shares issued under a performance share award may be adjusted by the Committee on the basis of such further consideration as the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine. However, the Committee may not, in any event, increase the number of shares earned upon satisfaction of any performance goal by any participant who is a Covered Employee. The Committee may, in its discretion, make a cash payment equal to the fair market value of shares of Common Stock otherwise required to be issued to a participant pursuant to a performance share award.

~~10.~~~~Performance Cash Awards~~. The Committee may designate the participants to whom cash incentives based on performance (“performance cash awards”) are to be awarded and determine the amount of the award and the terms and conditions of each such award. Each performance cash award shall entitle the participant to a payment in cash upon the attainment of one or more performance goals and other terms and conditions specified by the Committee. Performance cash awards may include, without limitation, special long-term incentive plans or other incentive programs based upon performance contained in employment agreements between a participant and the Company, including employment agreements entered into prior to the date set forth in Section 21 hereof. In order that performance cash awards be excluded from the application of the provisions of Code section 409A, a performance cash award shall be paid not later than 2-½ months after the end of the calendar year or fiscal year in which the performance period ends; provided, however, in the event that it is administratively or economically impracticable for the Company to make such payment within such 2-½ month period or if making such payment within such 2-½ month period would jeopardize the solvency of the Company, such payment shall be made as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable.

Notwithstanding the satisfaction of any performance goals, the amount to be paid under a performance cash award may be adjusted by the Committee on the basis of such further consideration as the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine. However, the Committee may not, in any event, increase the amount earned under a performance cash award upon satisfaction of any performance goal by any participant who is a Covered Employee, and the maximum amount earned by a Covered Employee in any fiscal year may not exceed $7,500,000. The Committee may, in its discretion, substitute actual shares of Common Stock for the cash payment otherwise required to be made to a participant pursuant to a performance cash award.

~~11.~~~~Performance Goals~~. Awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock equivalent units, performance shares, and performance cash awards may be made subject to the attainment of performance goals determined by reference to or based upon one or more business criteria within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, including the following goals: cash flow; cost; ratio of debt to debt plus equity; profit before tax; economic profit; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization; earnings per share; operating earnings; economic value added; ratio of operating earnings to capital spending; free cash flow; net profit; net sales; sales growth; price of the Company’s Common Stock; return on net assets,

~~Table of Contents~~

equity, or stockholders’ equity; return on invested capital; market share; or total return to stockholders (“performance criteria”). Any performance criteria may be measured, as applicable, (i) in absolute terms, (ii) in relative terms (including without limitation by the passage of time and/or against another company or companies), (iii) on a per-share basis, (iv) against the performance of the Company as a whole or a segment of the Company, (v) on a pre-tax or after-tax basis, and/or (vi) on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis. Measurement of the attainment of performance criteria may include or exclude, as specified by the Committee in an award agreement, impact of charges for restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and other unusual or non-recurring items, and the cumulative effects of tax or accounting changes, each as identified in the financial statements, in the Company’s accounting records, in the notes to the financial statements, in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the annual report on Form 10-K, or in other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. However, unless the Committee determines otherwise prior to the end of the applicable time for establishing metrics for an award, to the extent any item referenced in the preceding sentence affects any metric applicable to the Award, such item shall be automatically excluded or included in determining the extent to which the metrics have been achieved depending on which produces the higher Award (subject to any exercise of “negative discretion” by the Committee).

~~12.~~~~Change in Control~~. Immediately upon a change in control of the Company, all outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights shall become exercisable, all restrictions on restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock equivalent units shall lapse, and all performance awards shall be paid or delivered as if the performance goals had been fully achieved.

~~(a) A change in control of the Company shall be deemed to have occurred on the first to occur of any of the dates set forth in paragraphs (i), (ii), or (iii) of this Section 12(a):~~


	~~(i)~~	~~on the date of the consummation of:~~

	(A) any consolidation, merger, or similar corporate transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries or the acquisition of assets or stock of another entity by the Company or any of its subsidiaries (each, a “Business Combination”), in each case unless, following such Business Combination, (A) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities that were the beneficial owners of the Common Stock and Class B Stock immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, at least a majority of the then-outstanding ownership in and voting power of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, a corporation that, as a result of such transaction, owns the Company or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership prior to such Business Combination of the Common Stock and Class B Stock, as the case may be, (B) no Person (excluding any corporation resulting from such Business Combination or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the Company or such corporation resulting from such Business Combination) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of, respectively, the then-outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination or the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities of such corporation, except to the extent that such ownership existed prior to the Business Combination, and (C) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination were members of the Board of Directors at the time of the execution of the initial agreement or of the action of the Board providing for such Business Combination; or

	~~(B) any sale, lease, exchange, or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company; or~~

	~~(C) any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or~~

(ii) on the date any person (as such term is used in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act), other than the Company’s Savings and Investment Plan or similar successor plan, shall become the beneficial owner (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of twenty percent (20%) or more of the outstanding voting power of the Company except as a result of actions beyond the control of such person, including, without limitation, as a result of a shift in voting power of the Company as a result of the conversion by other persons of their Class B Stock into Common Stock; or

(iii) on the date, during any period of twenty-four (24) consecutive months on which individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the entire Board of Directors of the Company shall cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof unless the election of each new director comprising the majority was approved by a vote of at least a 2/3 majority of the Directors still in office who were Directors at the beginning of the period;

provided that, for purposes of awards hereunder which are subject to the provisions of Code section 409A, no change in control shall be deemed to have occurred unless such change in control would constitute a “change in control” under Code section 409A

~~Table of Contents~~

and related regulations (regarding a change in the ownership or effective control of a corporation, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of a corporation) and related guidance thereunder.

(b) Notwithstanding anything contained herein, no change in control shall be deemed to have occurred for the purpose of this Plan by virtue of any combination or agreement among shareholders of the Company who are descendants of E.T. Meredith, the founder of the Company, or trusts for the benefit of such persons.

~~13.~~~~Adjustment Provisions~~. Except as provided below with respect to mergers, consolidations, or combination of the Company with or into another corporation, in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, share combination, spin-off, sale of all or substantially all of the assets, extraordinary dividend, reorganization, or other change in corporate structure of the Company affecting the Common Stock, such equitable adjustment shall be made in the number and class of shares which may be delivered under the Plan (including the limits on stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance shares), and in the number and class of and/or price of shares subject to outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights, or other awards so that the aggregate consideration payable to the Company and the value of each option, stock appreciation right, or other awards shall not be changed. Adjustments may include the substitution of other property, including other securities, for the stock covered by outstanding awards and the assumption or replacement with new awards of awards held by participants terminating employment as a result of a spin-off or divestiture, provided that any such adjustment does not cause an award that would otherwise be excluded from the coverage of Code section 409A to be covered by Code section 409A, or does not cause a payment under the Plan to be subject to the income inclusion provisions of Code section 409A.

In the case of any merger, consolidation, or combination of the Company with or into another corporation which results in the outstanding Common Stock of the Company being converted into or exchanged for different securities, cash, or other property, or any combination thereof, there shall be substituted, on an equitable basis as determined by the Committee, in its discretion and consistent with Treas. Reg. section 1.409A-1(b)(v)(E)(4), for each share of Common Stock then subject to an award granted under the Plan, the number and kind of shares of stock, other securities, cash, or other property to which holders of Common Stock of the Company will be entitled pursuant to the transaction.

~~14.~~~~Nontransferability~~. No awards granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, all options and stock appreciation rights granted to a participant under the Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, at its discretion, permit a participant to transfer a grant or award to members of his/her immediate family or trusts or family partnerships for the benefit of such persons, subject to such terms and conditions as may be established by the Committee.

~~15.~~~~Determination of Fair Market Value~~. The fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock at any time shall be shall be the closing price on the grant date unless the Committee determines otherwise at the time of the Award in a manner consistent with Code section 409A, to the extent applicable, and any other applicable law or regulation.

~~16.~~~~Taxes~~. The Company shall be entitled to withhold the amount of any applicable tax (limited to the minimum statutory amount) attributable to any amounts payable or shares deliverable under the Plan after giving the person entitled to receive such payment or delivery notice as far in advance as practicable, and the Company may defer making payment or delivery as to any benefit if any such tax is payable until indemnified to its satisfaction.

The Committee may, in its discretion, and subject to such rules as it may adopt, permit a participant to pay all or a portion of any withholding taxes arising in connection with any award granted under this Plan by electing to have the Company withhold shares of Common Stock having a fair market value equal to the amount to be withheld.

~~17.~~~~Indemnification~~. Each person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee, or of the Board, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement thereof, with the Company’s approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit, or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~18.~~~~Other Provisions.~~

~~(a)~~ ~~Award Terms Established by the Committee~~. The award of any benefit under the Plan may also be subject to other provisions (whether or not applicable to the benefit awarded to any other participant) as the Committee determines appropriate, including provisions intended to comply with federal or state securities laws and stock exchange requirements, understandings or conditions as to the participant’s employment, requirements or inducements for continued ownership of Common Stock after exercise or vesting of benefits, forfeiture of awards in the event of termination of employment shortly after exercise or vesting, or breach of noncompetition or confidentiality agreements following termination of employment, or provisions permitting the deferral of the receipt of a benefit for such period and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. In addition, any cash or equity-based incentive compensation paid to a participant under the Plan shall be subject to policies established and amended from time to time by the Committee regarding the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation.

~~(b)~~ ~~Awards to Offshore Participants.~~In the event any benefit under this Plan is granted to a participant who is employed or providing services outside the United States and who is not compensated from a payroll maintained in the United States, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, modify the provisions of the Plan as they pertain to such individuals to comply with applicable law, regulation, or accounting rules and to meet the objectives and purpose of the Plan, and the Committee may, in its discretion, establish one or more sub-plans to reflect such amended or varied provisions.

~~(c)~~ ~~Deferral of Award Payments.~~ The Committee, in its sole discretion, may permit or require a participant to have amounts or shares of Common Stock that otherwise would be paid or delivered to the participant as a result of the exercise or settlement of an award under the Plan credited to a deferred compensation or stock unit account established for the participant by the Committee on the Company’s books of account; provided, however, that any deferrals made at the election of the participant comply with the requirements of Code section 409A concerning initial or subsequent deferrals, as applicable, and are made in writing and in accordance with such other procedures as the Committee may establish.

~~(d)~~ ~~Six-Month Delayed Payment to “Specified Employees.”~~ If any amount shall be payable with respect to any award hereunder as a result of a participant’s “separation from service” (as such term is defined under Code section 409A) at such time as the participant is a “specified employee” (as such term is defined under Code section 409A) and such amounts are subject to the provisions of Code section 409A, then no payment shall be made, except as permitted under Code section 409A, prior to the first day of the seventh (7^th~~) calendar month beginning after the participant’s separation from service (or the date of his or her earlier death), or as soon as administratively practicable thereafter.~~

~~19.~~~~Duration, Amendment, and Termination~~. No stock option or other benefit shall be granted after November 12, 2024; provided, however, that the terms and conditions applicable to any option or benefit granted on or before such date may thereafter be amended or modified by mutual agreement between the Company and the participant or such other persons as may then have an interest therein.

The Board may amend the Plan from time to time or terminate the Plan. However, no such action shall reduce the amount of any existing benefit or change the terms and conditions thereof without the participant’s consent. No amendment of the Plan shall be made without stockholder approval, if such approval is required by law, regulation, or stock exchange rule. No Plan termination that impacts any deferred compensation subject to Code section 409A shall be made without compliance with the provisions of Code section 409A regarding terminations and liquidations.

~~20.~~~~Successor~~. All obligations of the Company under the Plan, with respect to awards granted hereunder, shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

~~21.~~~~Effective Date; Stockholder Approval~~~~. The Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors on August 13, 2014, subject to stockholder approval.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

~~Table of Contents~~

Table of Contents

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

Table of Contents

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

Table of Contents

(GRAPHIC)

Table of Contents

Shareowner Services

P.O. Box 64945

St. Paul, MN 55164-0945

Vote by Internet, Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week

Your phone or Internet vote authorizes the named
proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you
~~you~~ marked, signed and returned your proxy ~~card.~~card.


	:	INTERNET/MOBILE – www.proxypush.com/mdp
		Use the Internet to vote your proxy until 11:59 p.m. ~~(CT)~~(CST) on November ~~11, 2014.~~
	(	~~PHONE – 1-866-883-3382~~8, 2016.

		PHONE – 1-866-883-3382 Use a touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy until 11:59 p.m. ~~(CT)~~(CST) on November ~~11, 2014.~~8, 2016.

	*	MAIL– Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.


		If you vote your proxy by Internet or by Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your Proxy Card.

Please detach here

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each nominee for director and FOR Proposals 2 3 and 4.3.

1. To elect three Class I directors for 01 Philip C. Marineau o Vote FOR o Vote WITHHELD
terms expiring in 2017: 02 Elizabeth E. Tallett all nominees from all nominees
03 Donald A. Baer (except as marked)
To elect one Class II director for
term expiring in 2015: 04 Donald C. Berg

1.	To elect, as provided in the Bylaws	01	Stephen M. Lacy	☐	Vote FOR	☐	Vote WITHHELD
	of the Company, two Class III	02	D. Mell Meredith Frazier		all nominees		from all nominees
	directors for terms expiring 2019:				(except as marked)

(Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for any indicated nominee,
write the number(s) of the nominee(s) in the box provided to the right.)


2.2.	To approve, on an advisory basis, the executive compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers as described in this Proxy ~~Statement~~Statement.	o	☐	For	o☐	Against	o☐	Abstain

3.	~~To approve the Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan~~	o	~~For~~	o	~~Against~~	o	~~Abstain~~

4.3.	To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending June 30, ~~2015~~2017.	o	☐	For	o☐	Against	o☐	Abstain

4.	To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

~~THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED AS THE BOARD RECOMMENDS.~~

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED AS THE BOARD RECOMMENDS.

Address Change? Mark box, sign, and indicate changes below:o

Date

Signature(s) in Box

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on Proxy. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy.

Table of Contents

MEREDITH CORPORATION

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Wednesday, November ~~12, 2014~~9, 2016

10:00 a.m. Central Standard Time

1716 Locust Street

Des Moines, IA 50309

Meredith Corporation

1716 Locust Street

Des Moines, IA

Common Stock

proxy

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on November ~~12, 2014.~~9, 2016.

The shares of stock you hold in your account or in a dividend reinvestment account will be voted as you specify on the reverse side.

If no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted FOR each of the nominees for director and FOR Proposals 2 3 and 4.3.

By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Stephen M. Lacy, D. Mell Meredith Frazier and Frederick B. Henry, or any of them with full power of substitution, to vote your shares on the matters shown on the reverse side and, in their discretion, any other matters which may come before the Annual Meeting ~~or any adjournment or postponement thereof.~~and all adjournments.

Voting Instructions to Trustee of the Meredith Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 2002 and/or Trustee of the Meredith Savings and Investment ~~Plan~~Plan.

If you are a participant in the Meredith Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 2002 and/or the Meredith Savings and Investment Plan, you have the right to give instructions to the Plan Trustee(s) as to the voting of certain shares of Meredith Corporation common stock allocated to your account. The voting of those shares will occur at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please indicate your voting choices on this card, sign and date it and return it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If your instructions are not received at least five (5) days prior to the Annual Meeting, or if you do not respond, shares held in your account for which a proxy is not received may be voted on certain matters in the discretion of the Trustee(s) and in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

See reverse for voting instructions.

Table of Contents

Shareowner Services

P.O. Box 64945

St. Paul, MN 55164-0945

Vote by Internet, Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week

Your phone or Internet vote authorizes the named
proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you
~~you~~ marked, signed and returned your proxy ~~card.~~card.


	:	INTERNET/MOBILE – www.proxypush.com/mdp
		Use the Internet to vote your proxy until 11:59 p.m. ~~(CT)~~(CST) on November ~~11, 2014.~~
	(	~~PHONE – 1-866-883-3382~~8, 2016.

		PHONE – 1-866-883-3382 Use a touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy until 11:59 p.m. ~~(CT)~~(CST) on November ~~11, 2014.~~8, 2016.

	*	MAIL– Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.


		If you vote your proxy by Internet or by Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your Proxy Card.

Please detach here

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each nominee for director and FOR Proposals 2 3 and 4.3.

1.	To elect, as provided in the Bylaws	01	Stephen M. Lacy	☐	Vote FOR	☐	Vote WITHHELD
	of the Company, two Class III	02	D. Mell Meredith Frazier		all nominees		from all nominees
	directors for terms expiring 2019:				(except as marked)

(Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for any indicated nominee,
write the number(s) of the nominee(s) in the box provided to the right.)


2.2.	To approve, on an advisory basis, the executive compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers as described in this Proxy ~~Statement~~Statement.	o	☐	For	o☐	Against	o☐	Abstain

3.	~~To approve the Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan~~	o	~~For~~	o	~~Against~~	o	~~Abstain~~

4.3.	To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending June 30, ~~2015~~2017.	o	☐	For	o☐	Against	o☐	Abstain

4.	To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

~~THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED AS THE BOARD RECOMMENDS.~~

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED AS THE BOARD RECOMMENDS.

Address Change? Mark box, sign, and indicate changes below:o

Date

Signature(s) in Box

Table of Contents

MEREDITH CORPORATION

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Wednesday, November ~~12, 2014~~9, 2016

10:00 a.m. Central Standard Time

1716 Locust Street

Des Moines, IA 50309

Meredith Corporation

1716 Locust Street

Des Moines, IA

Class B Common Stock

proxy

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on November ~~12, 2014.~~9, 2016.

The shares of stock you hold in your account or in a dividend reinvestment account will be voted as you specify on the reverse side.

If no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted FOR each of the nominees for director and FOR Proposals 2 3 and 4.3.

Voting Instructions to Trustee of the Meredith Savings and Investment Plan

If you are a participant in the Meredith Savings and Investment Plan, you have the right to give instructions to the Plan Trustee as to the voting of certain shares of Meredith Corporation class B common stock allocated to your account. The voting of those shares will occur at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please indicate your voting choices on this card, sign and date it and return it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If your instructions are not received at least five (5) days prior to the Annual Meeting, or if you do not respond, shares held in your account for which a proxy is not received may be voted on certain matters in the discretion of the Trustee(s) and in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

See reverse for voting instructions.


	Target ($)	Actual ($)	Level Achieved
EPS	2.85	2.77	Between Minimum and Target
Corporate
Operating Cash Flow(1)	160,000,000	155,993,000	Between Minimum and Target
Company Revenue	1,519,800,000	1,450,643,000	Between Minimum and Target
Development Contribution – EBITDA	7,000,000	44,548,000	Maximum
Capital Expenditure Management	27,500,000	23,611,000	Maximum
National Media Group
Operating Earnings	123,000,000	114,277,000	Between Minimum and Target
Cash Flow	97,500,000	90,267,000	Between Minimum and Target
Revenue	984,730,000	934,196,000	Below Minimum
Local Media Group
Operating Earnings	117,000,000	118,302,000	Between Target and Maximum
Cash Flow	122,500,000	133,985,000	Between Target and Maximum
Revenue	386,861,000	384,745,000	Between Minimum and Target


FY2012-2014	Minimum	Target	Maximum	Actual Award
Cumulative Cash Flow(1)	$475,000,000	$530,000,000	$585,000,000	$493,005,000
Payout %	50%	100%	150%	66.4%

Stephen M. Lacy	$375,000	$750,000	$1,125,000	$497,761
Joseph H. Ceryanec	$110,000	$220,000	$330,000	$146,010
Thomas H. Harty	$125,000	$250,000	$375,000	$165,920
Paul A. Karpowicz	$125,000	$250,000	$375,000	$165,920
John S. Zieser	$120,000	$240,000	$360,000	$159,284


FY2013-2015	Minimum	Target	Maximum
Cumulative Cash Flow(1)	$450,000,000	$500,000,000	$550,000,000
Payout %	50%	100%	200%

Stephen M. Lacy	$375,000	$750,000	$1,500,000
Joseph H. Ceryanec	$110,000	$220,000	$440,000
Thomas H. Harty	$125,000	$250,000	$500,000
Paul A. Karpowicz	$125,000	$250,000	$500,000
John S. Zieser	$120,000	$240,000	$480,000


Participant	Eligible Shares	Restricted Stock Granted
Stephen M. Lacy	2,215	443
Joseph H. Ceryanec	15,537	3,107
Thomas H. Harty	5,742	1,148
Paul A. Karpowicz*	6,522	—
John S. Zieser*	9,270	—
*Mr. Karpowicz and Mr. Zieser previously received all restricted stock grants available under the Program.


Name	Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)	Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1)	Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)	Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($)
Lacy	—	89,014	—	2,622,118
Ceryanec⁽²⁾	820,535	35,412	—	1,232,350
Harty	—	—	—	—
Karpowicz	—	—	—	—
Zieser	361,500	84,771	—	2,497,133


	For Cause ($)	Voluntary ($)	Without Cause ($)	Disability ($)	Death ($)
Payment equal to a multiple of base salary in effect at termination	N/A	N/A	1,950,000	975,000	975,000
Earned but unpaid Annual Incentive (1)	979,081	979,081	979,081	N/A	979,081
Payment of target Annual Incentive	N/A	N/A	1,950,000	975,000	N/A
Payment due under Cash LTIPs	N/A	1,285,896	1,285,896	1,285,896	1,285,896
Continued health/welfare benefits (2)(3)	N/A	N/A	29,531	N/A	N/A
Pension benefit (lump sum) (4)(5)	10,913,778	10,913,778	10,913,778	N/A	10,913,778
Immediate vesting of stock options (6)	N/A	4,880,610	4,880,610	4,880,610	4,880,610
Immediate vesting of restricted stock (7)	N/A	4,190,346	4,190,346	4,190,346	4,190,346


	For Cause ($)	Voluntary ($)	Without Cause ($)(1)	Disability ($)	Death ($)
Payment equal to a multiple of base salary in effect at termination	N/A	N/A	1,087,500	N/A	N/A
Earned but unpaid Annual Incentive(2)	N/A	N/A	N/A	471,235	471,235
Payment of target Annual Incentive	N/A	N/A	580,000	N/A	N/A
Payment due under Cash LTIPs	N/A	N/A	438,001	438,001	438,001
Pension benefit (lump sum) (3)	137,100	137,100	1,506,539	N/A	137,100
Immediate vesting of stock options (4)	N/A	N/A	N/A	1,529,270	1,529,270
Immediate vesting of restricted stock (5)	N/A	N/A	N/A	2,902,229	2,902,229


Lacy	Ceryanec	Harty	Karpowicz	Zieser
$2,925,000	$1,680,000	$2,175,000	$2,115,000	$1,935,000


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)(1)(3)(5)(6)	Option Awards ($)(2)(3)(5)(6)	Total ($)
Berg⁽⁴⁾	47,500	99,931	49,873	197,304
Coleman⁽⁴⁾	—	149,792	49,873	199,665
Craigie⁽⁵⁾	71,250	—	—	71,250
Frazier	105,000	50,018	49,873	204,891
Henry	105,000	50,018	49,873	204,891
Johnson⁽⁴⁾	—	160,309	49,873	210,182
Marineau	105,000	50,018	49,873	204,891
Tallett⁽⁴⁾	47,500	99,931	49,873	197,304


Name	Options	Restricted Stock	SEUs
Berg	12,164	1,988	3,918
Coleman	59,009	3,242	18,516
Frazier	65,009	2,616	—
Henry	55,394	2,616	1,993
Johnson	65,009	2,616	38,107
Marineau	58,025	2,616	4,886
Tallett	41,009	2,616	7,685


		2014		2013
Audit Fees (1)	$	981,109	$	1,313,363
Audit-Related Fees (2)		92,210		46,300
Tax Fees (3)		123,460		157,062
All Other Fees (4)		1,650		1,650
Total Fees	$	1,198,429	$	1,518,375


Plan Category	(a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	(b) Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	(c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders	3,877,800	$40.26	5,300,439
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders	None	N/A	None
Total	3,877,800	$40.26	5,300,439

1.	To elect three Class I directors for	01	Philip C. Marineau	o	Vote FOR	o	Vote WITHHELD
	terms expiring in 2017:	02	Elizabeth E. Tallett		all nominees		from all nominees
		03	Donald A. Baer		(except as marked)
	To elect one Class II director for
	term expiring in 2015:	04	Donald C. Berg